Cargando…
Serum Galectin-3 level and recurrence of atrial fibrillation post-ablation – Systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Serum galectin-3, a circulating biomarker of fibrosis, has been associated with atrial remodelling. Recent studies investigating serum galectin-3 and AF recurrence post-ablation have shown mixed results. We aimed to analyze the latest evidence on the association between serum galectin-3...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7082678/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32081686 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ipej.2020.02.002 |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND: Serum galectin-3, a circulating biomarker of fibrosis, has been associated with atrial remodelling. Recent studies investigating serum galectin-3 and AF recurrence post-ablation have shown mixed results. We aimed to analyze the latest evidence on the association between serum galectin-3 and AF recurrence after catheter ablation. METHODS: We performed a comprehensive search on topics that assesses serum galectin-3 and AF recurrence post-ablation up until August 2019. RESULTS: There were 597 patients from seven studies. The mean difference of serum galectin-3 was similar in both AF recurrence and non AF recurrence group (mean difference 0.78 ng/mL [-0.56, 2.13]; p = 0.25; I(2): 69%. Upon removal of a study in sensitivity analysis, the serum galectin-3 became higher in AF recurrence group (mean difference 1.41 ng/mL [0.47, 2.34], p = 0.003; I(2): 17%). Serum galectin-3 was associated with a higher risk for AF recurrence (HR 1.25 [1.01, 1.55]; p = 0.04; I(2): 76%). Upon removal of a study in sensitivity analysis, HR became 1.45 [1.07, 1.96], p = 0.02; I(2): 47%. Meta-analysis of adjusted HR demonstrated that high serum galectin-3 independently predicts AF recurrence (HR 1.15 [1.02, 1.29], p < 0.02; I(2): 57%, p = 0.10) CONCLUSION: Serum galectin-3 is associated with an increased risk of AF recurrence post-ablation. Further studies are required, especially emphasis on the cut-off point should be given, before integrating it in routine risk stratification for AF ablation. |
---|