Cargando…

Comparison of arrhythmia detection by conventional Holter and a novel ambulatory ECG system using patch and Android App, over 24 h period

BACKGROUND: Ambulatory electrocardiogram (AECG) is done for evaluation of arrhythmia. Commonly used AECG system is 24 h Holter. Patch based second generation AECG monitoring devices, which can record for longer periods, are now available. OBJECTIVE: Android App based WebCardio using WiPatch is a new...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Karunadas, Chakkalakkal Prabhakaran, Mathew, Cibu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7082686/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31866554
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ipej.2019.12.013
_version_ 1783508395116986368
author Karunadas, Chakkalakkal Prabhakaran
Mathew, Cibu
author_facet Karunadas, Chakkalakkal Prabhakaran
Mathew, Cibu
author_sort Karunadas, Chakkalakkal Prabhakaran
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Ambulatory electrocardiogram (AECG) is done for evaluation of arrhythmia. Commonly used AECG system is 24 h Holter. Patch based second generation AECG monitoring devices, which can record for longer periods, are now available. OBJECTIVE: Android App based WebCardio using WiPatch is a new AECG system which records ECG in two leads for 72 h. Our study compared the arrhythmia detection by WebCardio and conventional Holter by simultaneously connecting both for 24 h in patients having indication for AECG. METHODS: The AECG of patients who had simultaneous recording with WebCardio and conventional Holter, in the department of Cardiology, Medical College, Thrissur were evaluated. Ability to detect any of the 6 arrhythmias :1) atrial fibrillation (AF), 2) atrioventricular (AV) block, 3) sinus pause of ≥3 s (SP), 4) supraventricular tachycardia (SVT), 5) premature ventricular complex (PVC) and 6) ventricular tachycardia (VT)/ventricular fibrillation (VF) was compared. Detection of each arrhythmia was also compared. RESULTS: 141 patients had simultaneous recordings by both systems of AECG. The WebCardio picked up at least one of the 6 arrhythmias; AF, AV block, SP, SVT, PVC or VT/VF in 98 cases compared to 88 in the Holter (McNemars test, two tail P = 0.006). In eleven cases WebCardio detected an arrhythmia where Holter could not. In one case Holter identified an arrhythmia and WebCardio could not. Individual arrhythmias; AF, SP, SVT and VT/VF were detected equally by both systems. AV block (23 Vs 18, p = 0.0625) and PVCs (83 Vs 74, p = 0.0636) were detected in more number of cases in WebCardio. In the five cases where WebCardio alone identified AV block, four had poor quality of P wave in the Holter. CONCLUSION: Arrhythmia was picked up in more number of patients by the WebCardio compared to Holter. This was due to higher pickup of AV block and PVCs by WebCardio. Difference in AV block identification was due to better quality of P in WebCardio. WebCardio is a good alternative to Holter for AECG.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7082686
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70826862020-03-23 Comparison of arrhythmia detection by conventional Holter and a novel ambulatory ECG system using patch and Android App, over 24 h period Karunadas, Chakkalakkal Prabhakaran Mathew, Cibu Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J Original Article BACKGROUND: Ambulatory electrocardiogram (AECG) is done for evaluation of arrhythmia. Commonly used AECG system is 24 h Holter. Patch based second generation AECG monitoring devices, which can record for longer periods, are now available. OBJECTIVE: Android App based WebCardio using WiPatch is a new AECG system which records ECG in two leads for 72 h. Our study compared the arrhythmia detection by WebCardio and conventional Holter by simultaneously connecting both for 24 h in patients having indication for AECG. METHODS: The AECG of patients who had simultaneous recording with WebCardio and conventional Holter, in the department of Cardiology, Medical College, Thrissur were evaluated. Ability to detect any of the 6 arrhythmias :1) atrial fibrillation (AF), 2) atrioventricular (AV) block, 3) sinus pause of ≥3 s (SP), 4) supraventricular tachycardia (SVT), 5) premature ventricular complex (PVC) and 6) ventricular tachycardia (VT)/ventricular fibrillation (VF) was compared. Detection of each arrhythmia was also compared. RESULTS: 141 patients had simultaneous recordings by both systems of AECG. The WebCardio picked up at least one of the 6 arrhythmias; AF, AV block, SP, SVT, PVC or VT/VF in 98 cases compared to 88 in the Holter (McNemars test, two tail P = 0.006). In eleven cases WebCardio detected an arrhythmia where Holter could not. In one case Holter identified an arrhythmia and WebCardio could not. Individual arrhythmias; AF, SP, SVT and VT/VF were detected equally by both systems. AV block (23 Vs 18, p = 0.0625) and PVCs (83 Vs 74, p = 0.0636) were detected in more number of cases in WebCardio. In the five cases where WebCardio alone identified AV block, four had poor quality of P wave in the Holter. CONCLUSION: Arrhythmia was picked up in more number of patients by the WebCardio compared to Holter. This was due to higher pickup of AV block and PVCs by WebCardio. Difference in AV block identification was due to better quality of P in WebCardio. WebCardio is a good alternative to Holter for AECG. Elsevier 2019-12-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7082686/ /pubmed/31866554 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ipej.2019.12.013 Text en © 2019 Indian Heart Rhythm Society. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Karunadas, Chakkalakkal Prabhakaran
Mathew, Cibu
Comparison of arrhythmia detection by conventional Holter and a novel ambulatory ECG system using patch and Android App, over 24 h period
title Comparison of arrhythmia detection by conventional Holter and a novel ambulatory ECG system using patch and Android App, over 24 h period
title_full Comparison of arrhythmia detection by conventional Holter and a novel ambulatory ECG system using patch and Android App, over 24 h period
title_fullStr Comparison of arrhythmia detection by conventional Holter and a novel ambulatory ECG system using patch and Android App, over 24 h period
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of arrhythmia detection by conventional Holter and a novel ambulatory ECG system using patch and Android App, over 24 h period
title_short Comparison of arrhythmia detection by conventional Holter and a novel ambulatory ECG system using patch and Android App, over 24 h period
title_sort comparison of arrhythmia detection by conventional holter and a novel ambulatory ecg system using patch and android app, over 24 h period
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7082686/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31866554
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ipej.2019.12.013
work_keys_str_mv AT karunadaschakkalakkalprabhakaran comparisonofarrhythmiadetectionbyconventionalholterandanovelambulatoryecgsystemusingpatchandandroidappover24hperiod
AT mathewcibu comparisonofarrhythmiadetectionbyconventionalholterandanovelambulatoryecgsystemusingpatchandandroidappover24hperiod