Cargando…
Comparison of arrhythmia detection by conventional Holter and a novel ambulatory ECG system using patch and Android App, over 24 h period
BACKGROUND: Ambulatory electrocardiogram (AECG) is done for evaluation of arrhythmia. Commonly used AECG system is 24 h Holter. Patch based second generation AECG monitoring devices, which can record for longer periods, are now available. OBJECTIVE: Android App based WebCardio using WiPatch is a new...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7082686/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31866554 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ipej.2019.12.013 |
_version_ | 1783508395116986368 |
---|---|
author | Karunadas, Chakkalakkal Prabhakaran Mathew, Cibu |
author_facet | Karunadas, Chakkalakkal Prabhakaran Mathew, Cibu |
author_sort | Karunadas, Chakkalakkal Prabhakaran |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Ambulatory electrocardiogram (AECG) is done for evaluation of arrhythmia. Commonly used AECG system is 24 h Holter. Patch based second generation AECG monitoring devices, which can record for longer periods, are now available. OBJECTIVE: Android App based WebCardio using WiPatch is a new AECG system which records ECG in two leads for 72 h. Our study compared the arrhythmia detection by WebCardio and conventional Holter by simultaneously connecting both for 24 h in patients having indication for AECG. METHODS: The AECG of patients who had simultaneous recording with WebCardio and conventional Holter, in the department of Cardiology, Medical College, Thrissur were evaluated. Ability to detect any of the 6 arrhythmias :1) atrial fibrillation (AF), 2) atrioventricular (AV) block, 3) sinus pause of ≥3 s (SP), 4) supraventricular tachycardia (SVT), 5) premature ventricular complex (PVC) and 6) ventricular tachycardia (VT)/ventricular fibrillation (VF) was compared. Detection of each arrhythmia was also compared. RESULTS: 141 patients had simultaneous recordings by both systems of AECG. The WebCardio picked up at least one of the 6 arrhythmias; AF, AV block, SP, SVT, PVC or VT/VF in 98 cases compared to 88 in the Holter (McNemars test, two tail P = 0.006). In eleven cases WebCardio detected an arrhythmia where Holter could not. In one case Holter identified an arrhythmia and WebCardio could not. Individual arrhythmias; AF, SP, SVT and VT/VF were detected equally by both systems. AV block (23 Vs 18, p = 0.0625) and PVCs (83 Vs 74, p = 0.0636) were detected in more number of cases in WebCardio. In the five cases where WebCardio alone identified AV block, four had poor quality of P wave in the Holter. CONCLUSION: Arrhythmia was picked up in more number of patients by the WebCardio compared to Holter. This was due to higher pickup of AV block and PVCs by WebCardio. Difference in AV block identification was due to better quality of P in WebCardio. WebCardio is a good alternative to Holter for AECG. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7082686 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70826862020-03-23 Comparison of arrhythmia detection by conventional Holter and a novel ambulatory ECG system using patch and Android App, over 24 h period Karunadas, Chakkalakkal Prabhakaran Mathew, Cibu Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J Original Article BACKGROUND: Ambulatory electrocardiogram (AECG) is done for evaluation of arrhythmia. Commonly used AECG system is 24 h Holter. Patch based second generation AECG monitoring devices, which can record for longer periods, are now available. OBJECTIVE: Android App based WebCardio using WiPatch is a new AECG system which records ECG in two leads for 72 h. Our study compared the arrhythmia detection by WebCardio and conventional Holter by simultaneously connecting both for 24 h in patients having indication for AECG. METHODS: The AECG of patients who had simultaneous recording with WebCardio and conventional Holter, in the department of Cardiology, Medical College, Thrissur were evaluated. Ability to detect any of the 6 arrhythmias :1) atrial fibrillation (AF), 2) atrioventricular (AV) block, 3) sinus pause of ≥3 s (SP), 4) supraventricular tachycardia (SVT), 5) premature ventricular complex (PVC) and 6) ventricular tachycardia (VT)/ventricular fibrillation (VF) was compared. Detection of each arrhythmia was also compared. RESULTS: 141 patients had simultaneous recordings by both systems of AECG. The WebCardio picked up at least one of the 6 arrhythmias; AF, AV block, SP, SVT, PVC or VT/VF in 98 cases compared to 88 in the Holter (McNemars test, two tail P = 0.006). In eleven cases WebCardio detected an arrhythmia where Holter could not. In one case Holter identified an arrhythmia and WebCardio could not. Individual arrhythmias; AF, SP, SVT and VT/VF were detected equally by both systems. AV block (23 Vs 18, p = 0.0625) and PVCs (83 Vs 74, p = 0.0636) were detected in more number of cases in WebCardio. In the five cases where WebCardio alone identified AV block, four had poor quality of P wave in the Holter. CONCLUSION: Arrhythmia was picked up in more number of patients by the WebCardio compared to Holter. This was due to higher pickup of AV block and PVCs by WebCardio. Difference in AV block identification was due to better quality of P in WebCardio. WebCardio is a good alternative to Holter for AECG. Elsevier 2019-12-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7082686/ /pubmed/31866554 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ipej.2019.12.013 Text en © 2019 Indian Heart Rhythm Society. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Karunadas, Chakkalakkal Prabhakaran Mathew, Cibu Comparison of arrhythmia detection by conventional Holter and a novel ambulatory ECG system using patch and Android App, over 24 h period |
title | Comparison of arrhythmia detection by conventional Holter and a novel ambulatory ECG system using patch and Android App, over 24 h period |
title_full | Comparison of arrhythmia detection by conventional Holter and a novel ambulatory ECG system using patch and Android App, over 24 h period |
title_fullStr | Comparison of arrhythmia detection by conventional Holter and a novel ambulatory ECG system using patch and Android App, over 24 h period |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of arrhythmia detection by conventional Holter and a novel ambulatory ECG system using patch and Android App, over 24 h period |
title_short | Comparison of arrhythmia detection by conventional Holter and a novel ambulatory ECG system using patch and Android App, over 24 h period |
title_sort | comparison of arrhythmia detection by conventional holter and a novel ambulatory ecg system using patch and android app, over 24 h period |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7082686/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31866554 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ipej.2019.12.013 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT karunadaschakkalakkalprabhakaran comparisonofarrhythmiadetectionbyconventionalholterandanovelambulatoryecgsystemusingpatchandandroidappover24hperiod AT mathewcibu comparisonofarrhythmiadetectionbyconventionalholterandanovelambulatoryecgsystemusingpatchandandroidappover24hperiod |