Cargando…
Re-wiring Guilt: How Advancing Neuroscience Encourages Strategic Interventions Over Retributive Justice
The increasing visibility of neuroscience employed in legal contexts has rightfully prompted critical discourse regarding the boundaries of its utility. High profile debates include some extreme positions that either undermine the relevance of neuroscience or overstate its role in determining legal...
Autores principales: | Anderson, Nathaniel E., Kiehl, Kent A. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7082751/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32231619 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00390 |
Ejemplares similares
-
The Roles of Dehumanization and Moral Outrage in Retributive Justice
por: Bastian, Brock, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Why does Existential Threat Promote Intergroup Violence? Examining the Role of Retributive Justice and Cost-Benefit Utility Motivations
por: Hirschberger, Gilad, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Rooks and Retribution
Publicado: (1891) -
Debunking (the) Retribution (Gap)
por: Kraaijeveld, Steven R.
Publicado: (2019) -
Stepping into Perpetrators’ Shoes: How Ingroup Transgressions and Victimization Shape Support for Retributive Justice through Perspective-Taking With Perpetrators
por: Li, Mengyao, et al.
Publicado: (2019)