Cargando…

Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Tenotomy for Gluteal Tendinopathy

BACKGROUND: Gluteal tendinopathy is a common cause of lateral hip pain. Percutaneous ultrasonic tenotomy (PUT) has been used successfully for the treatment of tendinopathy of the elbow, knee, and ankle, but its use in the hip has not been described. PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of PUT in patien...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baker, Champ L., Mahoney, J. Ryan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7082875/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32232066
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967120907868
_version_ 1783508429855260672
author Baker, Champ L.
Mahoney, J. Ryan
author_facet Baker, Champ L.
Mahoney, J. Ryan
author_sort Baker, Champ L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Gluteal tendinopathy is a common cause of lateral hip pain. Percutaneous ultrasonic tenotomy (PUT) has been used successfully for the treatment of tendinopathy of the elbow, knee, and ankle, but its use in the hip has not been described. PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of PUT in patients who did not respond to nonsurgical management of gluteal tendinopathy. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: A total of 29 patients with gluteal tendinopathy (mean age, 62 years) who did not respond to nonsurgical treatment were enrolled in this prospective study and underwent ultrasound-guided PUT in an outpatient setting. Patients with a history of ipsilateral hip surgery were excluded. All patients initially underwent magnetic resonance imaging or a computed tomography arthrogram demonstrating tendinopathy and/or partial tearing of the gluteus minimus or medius tendon or both tendons. Outcomes were assessed with a visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, the Harris Hip Score evaluation, and the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) before the procedure and at subsequent follow-up visits or by telephone interviews at 3 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and final follow-up (range, 18-30 months). RESULTS: The mean final follow-up was at 22 months postoperatively. At final follow-up, VAS scores had improved from a preprocedural mean ± SD of 5.86 ± 1.73 to 2.82 ± 2.22 (P < .01). Harris Hip Scores improved from a preprocedural mean of 60.03 ± 10.86 to 77.47 ± 14.34 (P < .01). Total SF-12 scores improved from a mean of 29.93 ± 5.39 (51% optimal) to 34.41 ± 4.88 (64% optimal) (P < .01). No complications were reported. At final follow-up, when asked whether they would have the procedure again, 15 patients replied “yes definitely,” 3 replied “yes probably,” 3 replied “maybe,” 1 replied “likely not,” and 2 replied “definitely not.” There were 3 patients who eventually had hip abductor tendon repair, and their PUT procedures were considered failures. CONCLUSION: PUT is an effective treatment, with good results for patients with gluteal tendinopathy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7082875
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70828752020-03-30 Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Tenotomy for Gluteal Tendinopathy Baker, Champ L. Mahoney, J. Ryan Orthop J Sports Med Article BACKGROUND: Gluteal tendinopathy is a common cause of lateral hip pain. Percutaneous ultrasonic tenotomy (PUT) has been used successfully for the treatment of tendinopathy of the elbow, knee, and ankle, but its use in the hip has not been described. PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of PUT in patients who did not respond to nonsurgical management of gluteal tendinopathy. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: A total of 29 patients with gluteal tendinopathy (mean age, 62 years) who did not respond to nonsurgical treatment were enrolled in this prospective study and underwent ultrasound-guided PUT in an outpatient setting. Patients with a history of ipsilateral hip surgery were excluded. All patients initially underwent magnetic resonance imaging or a computed tomography arthrogram demonstrating tendinopathy and/or partial tearing of the gluteus minimus or medius tendon or both tendons. Outcomes were assessed with a visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, the Harris Hip Score evaluation, and the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) before the procedure and at subsequent follow-up visits or by telephone interviews at 3 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and final follow-up (range, 18-30 months). RESULTS: The mean final follow-up was at 22 months postoperatively. At final follow-up, VAS scores had improved from a preprocedural mean ± SD of 5.86 ± 1.73 to 2.82 ± 2.22 (P < .01). Harris Hip Scores improved from a preprocedural mean of 60.03 ± 10.86 to 77.47 ± 14.34 (P < .01). Total SF-12 scores improved from a mean of 29.93 ± 5.39 (51% optimal) to 34.41 ± 4.88 (64% optimal) (P < .01). No complications were reported. At final follow-up, when asked whether they would have the procedure again, 15 patients replied “yes definitely,” 3 replied “yes probably,” 3 replied “maybe,” 1 replied “likely not,” and 2 replied “definitely not.” There were 3 patients who eventually had hip abductor tendon repair, and their PUT procedures were considered failures. CONCLUSION: PUT is an effective treatment, with good results for patients with gluteal tendinopathy. SAGE Publications 2020-03-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7082875/ /pubmed/32232066 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967120907868 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Article
Baker, Champ L.
Mahoney, J. Ryan
Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Tenotomy for Gluteal Tendinopathy
title Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Tenotomy for Gluteal Tendinopathy
title_full Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Tenotomy for Gluteal Tendinopathy
title_fullStr Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Tenotomy for Gluteal Tendinopathy
title_full_unstemmed Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Tenotomy for Gluteal Tendinopathy
title_short Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Tenotomy for Gluteal Tendinopathy
title_sort ultrasound-guided percutaneous tenotomy for gluteal tendinopathy
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7082875/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32232066
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967120907868
work_keys_str_mv AT bakerchampl ultrasoundguidedpercutaneoustenotomyforglutealtendinopathy
AT mahoneyjryan ultrasoundguidedpercutaneoustenotomyforglutealtendinopathy