Cargando…

Translating a rodent measure of negative bias into humans: the impact of induced anxiety and unmedicated mood and anxiety disorders

BACKGROUND: Mood and anxiety disorders are ubiquitous but current treatment options are ineffective for many sufferers. Moreover, a number of promising pre-clinical interventions have failed to translate into clinical efficacy in humans. Improved treatments are unlikely without better animal–human t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aylward, Jessica, Hales, Claire, Robinson, Emma, Robinson, Oliver J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7083556/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30683161
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0033291718004117
_version_ 1783508552807088128
author Aylward, Jessica
Hales, Claire
Robinson, Emma
Robinson, Oliver J.
author_facet Aylward, Jessica
Hales, Claire
Robinson, Emma
Robinson, Oliver J.
author_sort Aylward, Jessica
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Mood and anxiety disorders are ubiquitous but current treatment options are ineffective for many sufferers. Moreover, a number of promising pre-clinical interventions have failed to translate into clinical efficacy in humans. Improved treatments are unlikely without better animal–human translational pipelines. Here, we translate a rodent measure of negative affective bias into humans, exploring its relationship with (1) pathological mood and anxiety symptoms and (2) transient induced anxiety. METHODS: Adult participants (age = 29 ± 11) who met criteria for mood or anxiety disorder symptomatology according to a face-to-face neuropsychiatric interview were included in the symptomatic group. Study 1 included N = 77 (47 = asymptomatic [female = 21]; 30 = symptomatic [female = 25]), study 2 included N = 47 asymptomatic participants (25 = female). Outcome measures were choice ratios, reaction times and parameters recovered from a computational model of reaction time – the drift diffusion model (DDM) – from a two-alternative-forced-choice task in which ambiguous and unambiguous auditory stimuli were paired with high and low rewards. RESULTS: Both groups showed over 93% accuracy on unambiguous tones indicating intact discrimination, but symptomatic individuals demonstrated increased negative affective bias on ambiguous tones [proportion high reward = 0.42 (s.d. = 0.14)] relative to asymptomatic individuals [0.53 (s.d. = 0.17)] as well as a significantly reduced DDM drift rate. No significant effects were observed for the within-subjects anxiety-induction. CONCLUSIONS: Humans with pathological anxiety symptoms directly mimic rodents undergoing anxiogenic manipulation. The lack of sensitivity to transient anxiety suggests the paradigm might be more sensitive to clinically relevant symptoms. Our results establish a direct translational pipeline (and candidate therapeutics screen) from negative affective bias in rodents to pathological mood and anxiety symptoms in humans.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7083556
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70835562020-03-25 Translating a rodent measure of negative bias into humans: the impact of induced anxiety and unmedicated mood and anxiety disorders Aylward, Jessica Hales, Claire Robinson, Emma Robinson, Oliver J. Psychol Med Original Articles BACKGROUND: Mood and anxiety disorders are ubiquitous but current treatment options are ineffective for many sufferers. Moreover, a number of promising pre-clinical interventions have failed to translate into clinical efficacy in humans. Improved treatments are unlikely without better animal–human translational pipelines. Here, we translate a rodent measure of negative affective bias into humans, exploring its relationship with (1) pathological mood and anxiety symptoms and (2) transient induced anxiety. METHODS: Adult participants (age = 29 ± 11) who met criteria for mood or anxiety disorder symptomatology according to a face-to-face neuropsychiatric interview were included in the symptomatic group. Study 1 included N = 77 (47 = asymptomatic [female = 21]; 30 = symptomatic [female = 25]), study 2 included N = 47 asymptomatic participants (25 = female). Outcome measures were choice ratios, reaction times and parameters recovered from a computational model of reaction time – the drift diffusion model (DDM) – from a two-alternative-forced-choice task in which ambiguous and unambiguous auditory stimuli were paired with high and low rewards. RESULTS: Both groups showed over 93% accuracy on unambiguous tones indicating intact discrimination, but symptomatic individuals demonstrated increased negative affective bias on ambiguous tones [proportion high reward = 0.42 (s.d. = 0.14)] relative to asymptomatic individuals [0.53 (s.d. = 0.17)] as well as a significantly reduced DDM drift rate. No significant effects were observed for the within-subjects anxiety-induction. CONCLUSIONS: Humans with pathological anxiety symptoms directly mimic rodents undergoing anxiogenic manipulation. The lack of sensitivity to transient anxiety suggests the paradigm might be more sensitive to clinically relevant symptoms. Our results establish a direct translational pipeline (and candidate therapeutics screen) from negative affective bias in rodents to pathological mood and anxiety symptoms in humans. Cambridge University Press 2019-01-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7083556/ /pubmed/30683161 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0033291718004117 Text en © Cambridge University Press 2019 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Aylward, Jessica
Hales, Claire
Robinson, Emma
Robinson, Oliver J.
Translating a rodent measure of negative bias into humans: the impact of induced anxiety and unmedicated mood and anxiety disorders
title Translating a rodent measure of negative bias into humans: the impact of induced anxiety and unmedicated mood and anxiety disorders
title_full Translating a rodent measure of negative bias into humans: the impact of induced anxiety and unmedicated mood and anxiety disorders
title_fullStr Translating a rodent measure of negative bias into humans: the impact of induced anxiety and unmedicated mood and anxiety disorders
title_full_unstemmed Translating a rodent measure of negative bias into humans: the impact of induced anxiety and unmedicated mood and anxiety disorders
title_short Translating a rodent measure of negative bias into humans: the impact of induced anxiety and unmedicated mood and anxiety disorders
title_sort translating a rodent measure of negative bias into humans: the impact of induced anxiety and unmedicated mood and anxiety disorders
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7083556/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30683161
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0033291718004117
work_keys_str_mv AT aylwardjessica translatingarodentmeasureofnegativebiasintohumanstheimpactofinducedanxietyandunmedicatedmoodandanxietydisorders
AT halesclaire translatingarodentmeasureofnegativebiasintohumanstheimpactofinducedanxietyandunmedicatedmoodandanxietydisorders
AT robinsonemma translatingarodentmeasureofnegativebiasintohumanstheimpactofinducedanxietyandunmedicatedmoodandanxietydisorders
AT robinsonoliverj translatingarodentmeasureofnegativebiasintohumanstheimpactofinducedanxietyandunmedicatedmoodandanxietydisorders