Cargando…

Mass–abundance scaling in avian communities is maintained after tropical selective logging

1. Selective logging dominates forested landscapes across the tropics. Despite the structural damage incurred, selectively logged forests typically retain more biodiversity than other forest disturbances. Most logging impact studies consider conventional metrics, like species richness, but these can...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cosset, Cindy C. P., Gilroy, James J., Srinivasan, Umesh, Hethcoat, Matthew G., Edwards, David P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7083669/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32211157
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6066
_version_ 1783508571600715776
author Cosset, Cindy C. P.
Gilroy, James J.
Srinivasan, Umesh
Hethcoat, Matthew G.
Edwards, David P.
author_facet Cosset, Cindy C. P.
Gilroy, James J.
Srinivasan, Umesh
Hethcoat, Matthew G.
Edwards, David P.
author_sort Cosset, Cindy C. P.
collection PubMed
description 1. Selective logging dominates forested landscapes across the tropics. Despite the structural damage incurred, selectively logged forests typically retain more biodiversity than other forest disturbances. Most logging impact studies consider conventional metrics, like species richness, but these can conceal subtle biodiversity impacts. The mass–abundance relationship is an integral feature of ecological communities, describing the negative relationship between body mass and population abundance, where, in a system without anthropogenic influence, larger species are less abundant due to higher energy requirements. Changes in this relationship can indicate community structure and function changes. 2. We investigated the impacts of selective logging on the mass–abundance scaling of avian communities by conducting a meta‐analysis to examine its pantropical trend. We divide our analysis between studies using mist netting, sampling the understory avian community, and point counts, sampling the entire community. 3. Across 19 mist‐netting studies, we found no consistent effects of selective logging on mass–abundance scaling relative to primary forests, except for the omnivore guild where there were fewer larger‐bodied species after logging. In eleven point‐count studies, we found a more negative relationship in the whole community after logging, likely driven by the frugivore guild, showing a similar pattern. 4. Limited effects of logging on mass–abundance scaling may suggest high species turnover in logged communities, with like‐for‐like replacement of lost species with similar‐sized species. The increased negative mass–abundance relationship found in some logged communities could result from resource depletion, density compensation, or increased hunting; potentially indicating downstream impacts on ecosystem functions. 5. Synthesis and applications. Our results suggest that size distributions of avian communities in logged forests are relatively robust to disturbance, potentially maintaining ecosystem processes in these forests, thus underscoring the high conservation value of logged tropical forests, indicating an urgent need to focus on their protection from further degradation and deforestation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7083669
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70836692020-03-24 Mass–abundance scaling in avian communities is maintained after tropical selective logging Cosset, Cindy C. P. Gilroy, James J. Srinivasan, Umesh Hethcoat, Matthew G. Edwards, David P. Ecol Evol Original Research 1. Selective logging dominates forested landscapes across the tropics. Despite the structural damage incurred, selectively logged forests typically retain more biodiversity than other forest disturbances. Most logging impact studies consider conventional metrics, like species richness, but these can conceal subtle biodiversity impacts. The mass–abundance relationship is an integral feature of ecological communities, describing the negative relationship between body mass and population abundance, where, in a system without anthropogenic influence, larger species are less abundant due to higher energy requirements. Changes in this relationship can indicate community structure and function changes. 2. We investigated the impacts of selective logging on the mass–abundance scaling of avian communities by conducting a meta‐analysis to examine its pantropical trend. We divide our analysis between studies using mist netting, sampling the understory avian community, and point counts, sampling the entire community. 3. Across 19 mist‐netting studies, we found no consistent effects of selective logging on mass–abundance scaling relative to primary forests, except for the omnivore guild where there were fewer larger‐bodied species after logging. In eleven point‐count studies, we found a more negative relationship in the whole community after logging, likely driven by the frugivore guild, showing a similar pattern. 4. Limited effects of logging on mass–abundance scaling may suggest high species turnover in logged communities, with like‐for‐like replacement of lost species with similar‐sized species. The increased negative mass–abundance relationship found in some logged communities could result from resource depletion, density compensation, or increased hunting; potentially indicating downstream impacts on ecosystem functions. 5. Synthesis and applications. Our results suggest that size distributions of avian communities in logged forests are relatively robust to disturbance, potentially maintaining ecosystem processes in these forests, thus underscoring the high conservation value of logged tropical forests, indicating an urgent need to focus on their protection from further degradation and deforestation. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-02-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7083669/ /pubmed/32211157 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6066 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Cosset, Cindy C. P.
Gilroy, James J.
Srinivasan, Umesh
Hethcoat, Matthew G.
Edwards, David P.
Mass–abundance scaling in avian communities is maintained after tropical selective logging
title Mass–abundance scaling in avian communities is maintained after tropical selective logging
title_full Mass–abundance scaling in avian communities is maintained after tropical selective logging
title_fullStr Mass–abundance scaling in avian communities is maintained after tropical selective logging
title_full_unstemmed Mass–abundance scaling in avian communities is maintained after tropical selective logging
title_short Mass–abundance scaling in avian communities is maintained after tropical selective logging
title_sort mass–abundance scaling in avian communities is maintained after tropical selective logging
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7083669/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32211157
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6066
work_keys_str_mv AT cossetcindycp massabundancescalinginaviancommunitiesismaintainedaftertropicalselectivelogging
AT gilroyjamesj massabundancescalinginaviancommunitiesismaintainedaftertropicalselectivelogging
AT srinivasanumesh massabundancescalinginaviancommunitiesismaintainedaftertropicalselectivelogging
AT hethcoatmatthewg massabundancescalinginaviancommunitiesismaintainedaftertropicalselectivelogging
AT edwardsdavidp massabundancescalinginaviancommunitiesismaintainedaftertropicalselectivelogging