Cargando…

Contact forces in roughness discrimination

Roughness perception through fingertip contact with a textured surface can involve spatial and temporal cues from skin indentation and vibration respectively. Both types of cue may be affected by contact forces when feeling a surface and we ask whether, on a given trial, discrimination performance r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Roberts, Roberta D., Loomes, Aldrin R., Allen, Harriet A., Di Luca, Massimiliano, Wing, Alan M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7083896/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32198432
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-61943-x
_version_ 1783508618288562176
author Roberts, Roberta D.
Loomes, Aldrin R.
Allen, Harriet A.
Di Luca, Massimiliano
Wing, Alan M.
author_facet Roberts, Roberta D.
Loomes, Aldrin R.
Allen, Harriet A.
Di Luca, Massimiliano
Wing, Alan M.
author_sort Roberts, Roberta D.
collection PubMed
description Roughness perception through fingertip contact with a textured surface can involve spatial and temporal cues from skin indentation and vibration respectively. Both types of cue may be affected by contact forces when feeling a surface and we ask whether, on a given trial, discrimination performance relates to contact forces. We examine roughness discrimination performance in a standard psychophysical method (2-interval forced choice, in which the participant identifies which of two spatial textures formed by parallel grooves feels rougher) while continuously measuring the normal and tangential forces applied by the index finger. Fourteen participants discriminated spatial gratings in fine (spatial period of 320–580 micron) and coarse (1520–1920 micron) ranges using static pressing or sliding contact of the index finger. Normal contact force (mean and variability) during pressing or sliding had relatively little impact on accuracy of roughness judgments except when pressing on surfaces in the coarse range. Discrimination was better for sliding than pressing in the fine but not the coarse range. In contrast, tangential force fluctuations during sliding were strongly related to roughness judgment accuracy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7083896
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70838962020-03-26 Contact forces in roughness discrimination Roberts, Roberta D. Loomes, Aldrin R. Allen, Harriet A. Di Luca, Massimiliano Wing, Alan M. Sci Rep Article Roughness perception through fingertip contact with a textured surface can involve spatial and temporal cues from skin indentation and vibration respectively. Both types of cue may be affected by contact forces when feeling a surface and we ask whether, on a given trial, discrimination performance relates to contact forces. We examine roughness discrimination performance in a standard psychophysical method (2-interval forced choice, in which the participant identifies which of two spatial textures formed by parallel grooves feels rougher) while continuously measuring the normal and tangential forces applied by the index finger. Fourteen participants discriminated spatial gratings in fine (spatial period of 320–580 micron) and coarse (1520–1920 micron) ranges using static pressing or sliding contact of the index finger. Normal contact force (mean and variability) during pressing or sliding had relatively little impact on accuracy of roughness judgments except when pressing on surfaces in the coarse range. Discrimination was better for sliding than pressing in the fine but not the coarse range. In contrast, tangential force fluctuations during sliding were strongly related to roughness judgment accuracy. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-03-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7083896/ /pubmed/32198432 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-61943-x Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Roberts, Roberta D.
Loomes, Aldrin R.
Allen, Harriet A.
Di Luca, Massimiliano
Wing, Alan M.
Contact forces in roughness discrimination
title Contact forces in roughness discrimination
title_full Contact forces in roughness discrimination
title_fullStr Contact forces in roughness discrimination
title_full_unstemmed Contact forces in roughness discrimination
title_short Contact forces in roughness discrimination
title_sort contact forces in roughness discrimination
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7083896/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32198432
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-61943-x
work_keys_str_mv AT robertsrobertad contactforcesinroughnessdiscrimination
AT loomesaldrinr contactforcesinroughnessdiscrimination
AT allenharrieta contactforcesinroughnessdiscrimination
AT dilucamassimiliano contactforcesinroughnessdiscrimination
AT wingalanm contactforcesinroughnessdiscrimination