Cargando…

Benchmarking the MinION: Evaluating long reads for microbial profiling

Nanopore based DNA-sequencing delivers long reads, thereby simplifying the decipherment of bacterial communities. Since its commercial appearance, this technology has been assigned several attributes, such as its error proneness, comparatively low cost, ease-of-use, and, most notably, aforementioned...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Leidenfrost, Robert Maximilian, Pöther, Dierk-Christoph, Jäckel, Udo, Wünschiers, Röbbe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7083898/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32198413
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-61989-x
_version_ 1783508618750984192
author Leidenfrost, Robert Maximilian
Pöther, Dierk-Christoph
Jäckel, Udo
Wünschiers, Röbbe
author_facet Leidenfrost, Robert Maximilian
Pöther, Dierk-Christoph
Jäckel, Udo
Wünschiers, Röbbe
author_sort Leidenfrost, Robert Maximilian
collection PubMed
description Nanopore based DNA-sequencing delivers long reads, thereby simplifying the decipherment of bacterial communities. Since its commercial appearance, this technology has been assigned several attributes, such as its error proneness, comparatively low cost, ease-of-use, and, most notably, aforementioned long reads. The technology as a whole is under continued development. As such, benchmarks are required to conceive, test and improve analysis protocols, including those related to the understanding of the composition of microbial communities. Here we present a dataset composed of twelve different prokaryotic species split into four samples differing by nucleic acid quantification technique to assess the specificity and sensitivity of the MinION nanopore sequencer in a blind study design. Taxonomic classification was performed by standard taxonomic sequence classification tools, namely Kraken, Kraken2 and Centrifuge directly on reads. This allowed taxonomic assignments of up to 99.27% on genus level and 92.78% on species level, enabling true-positive classification of strains down to 25,000 genomes per sample. Full genomic coverage is achieved for strains abundant as low as 250,000 genomes per sample under our experimental settings. In summary, we present an evaluation of nanopore sequence processing analysis with respect to microbial community composition. It provides an open protocol and the data may serve as basis for the development and benchmarking of future data processing pipelines.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7083898
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70838982020-03-26 Benchmarking the MinION: Evaluating long reads for microbial profiling Leidenfrost, Robert Maximilian Pöther, Dierk-Christoph Jäckel, Udo Wünschiers, Röbbe Sci Rep Article Nanopore based DNA-sequencing delivers long reads, thereby simplifying the decipherment of bacterial communities. Since its commercial appearance, this technology has been assigned several attributes, such as its error proneness, comparatively low cost, ease-of-use, and, most notably, aforementioned long reads. The technology as a whole is under continued development. As such, benchmarks are required to conceive, test and improve analysis protocols, including those related to the understanding of the composition of microbial communities. Here we present a dataset composed of twelve different prokaryotic species split into four samples differing by nucleic acid quantification technique to assess the specificity and sensitivity of the MinION nanopore sequencer in a blind study design. Taxonomic classification was performed by standard taxonomic sequence classification tools, namely Kraken, Kraken2 and Centrifuge directly on reads. This allowed taxonomic assignments of up to 99.27% on genus level and 92.78% on species level, enabling true-positive classification of strains down to 25,000 genomes per sample. Full genomic coverage is achieved for strains abundant as low as 250,000 genomes per sample under our experimental settings. In summary, we present an evaluation of nanopore sequence processing analysis with respect to microbial community composition. It provides an open protocol and the data may serve as basis for the development and benchmarking of future data processing pipelines. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-03-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7083898/ /pubmed/32198413 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-61989-x Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Leidenfrost, Robert Maximilian
Pöther, Dierk-Christoph
Jäckel, Udo
Wünschiers, Röbbe
Benchmarking the MinION: Evaluating long reads for microbial profiling
title Benchmarking the MinION: Evaluating long reads for microbial profiling
title_full Benchmarking the MinION: Evaluating long reads for microbial profiling
title_fullStr Benchmarking the MinION: Evaluating long reads for microbial profiling
title_full_unstemmed Benchmarking the MinION: Evaluating long reads for microbial profiling
title_short Benchmarking the MinION: Evaluating long reads for microbial profiling
title_sort benchmarking the minion: evaluating long reads for microbial profiling
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7083898/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32198413
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-61989-x
work_keys_str_mv AT leidenfrostrobertmaximilian benchmarkingtheminionevaluatinglongreadsformicrobialprofiling
AT potherdierkchristoph benchmarkingtheminionevaluatinglongreadsformicrobialprofiling
AT jackeludo benchmarkingtheminionevaluatinglongreadsformicrobialprofiling
AT wunschiersrobbe benchmarkingtheminionevaluatinglongreadsformicrobialprofiling