Cargando…
Comparison of Azithromycin Removal from Water Using UV Radiation, Fe (VI) Oxidation Process and ZnO Nanoparticles
Antibiotics are resistant to biodegradation, and their removal by biological processes is difficult. The purpose of this study was to investigate the removal of azithromycin from water using ultraviolet radiation (UV), Fe (VI) oxidation process and ZnO nanoparticles. The effect of different paramete...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7084330/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32182710 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17051758 |
_version_ | 1783508696947490816 |
---|---|
author | Talaiekhozani, Amirreza Joudaki, Sahar Banisharif, Farhad Eskandari, Zeinab Cho, Jinwoo Moghadam, Ghasem Rezania, Shahabaldin |
author_facet | Talaiekhozani, Amirreza Joudaki, Sahar Banisharif, Farhad Eskandari, Zeinab Cho, Jinwoo Moghadam, Ghasem Rezania, Shahabaldin |
author_sort | Talaiekhozani, Amirreza |
collection | PubMed |
description | Antibiotics are resistant to biodegradation, and their removal by biological processes is difficult. The purpose of this study was to investigate the removal of azithromycin from water using ultraviolet radiation (UV), Fe (VI) oxidation process and ZnO nanoparticles. The effect of different parameters such as pH, temperature, hydraulic retention time (HRT), the concentration of Fe (VI) and ZnO nanoparticles and UV intensity on the removal of azithromycin from water was investigated. The optimal conditions for the removal of azithromycin were a pH of 2, a temperature of 25 °C, a HRT of 15 min, and a ratio of ZnO nanoparticles to the initial concentration of azithromycin (A/P) of 0.00009 which was fitted by Langmuir isotherm. In addition, the optimal conditions for the removal of azithromycin using UV radiation were a pH of 7, a temperature of 65 °C, a HRT of 60 min, and UV radiation power of 163 mW/cm(2). For the Fe (VI) oxidation process, the optimal conditions were a pH of 2, a temperature of 50 °C and a HRT of 20 min. Also, the optimal ratio of Fe (VI) to the initial concentration of antibiotic was between 0.011 and 0.012. The results of this study showed that the Fe (VI) oxidation process, UV radiation, and ZnO nanoparticles were efficient methods for the removal of azithromycin from water. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7084330 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70843302020-03-24 Comparison of Azithromycin Removal from Water Using UV Radiation, Fe (VI) Oxidation Process and ZnO Nanoparticles Talaiekhozani, Amirreza Joudaki, Sahar Banisharif, Farhad Eskandari, Zeinab Cho, Jinwoo Moghadam, Ghasem Rezania, Shahabaldin Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Antibiotics are resistant to biodegradation, and their removal by biological processes is difficult. The purpose of this study was to investigate the removal of azithromycin from water using ultraviolet radiation (UV), Fe (VI) oxidation process and ZnO nanoparticles. The effect of different parameters such as pH, temperature, hydraulic retention time (HRT), the concentration of Fe (VI) and ZnO nanoparticles and UV intensity on the removal of azithromycin from water was investigated. The optimal conditions for the removal of azithromycin were a pH of 2, a temperature of 25 °C, a HRT of 15 min, and a ratio of ZnO nanoparticles to the initial concentration of azithromycin (A/P) of 0.00009 which was fitted by Langmuir isotherm. In addition, the optimal conditions for the removal of azithromycin using UV radiation were a pH of 7, a temperature of 65 °C, a HRT of 60 min, and UV radiation power of 163 mW/cm(2). For the Fe (VI) oxidation process, the optimal conditions were a pH of 2, a temperature of 50 °C and a HRT of 20 min. Also, the optimal ratio of Fe (VI) to the initial concentration of antibiotic was between 0.011 and 0.012. The results of this study showed that the Fe (VI) oxidation process, UV radiation, and ZnO nanoparticles were efficient methods for the removal of azithromycin from water. MDPI 2020-03-08 2020-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7084330/ /pubmed/32182710 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17051758 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Talaiekhozani, Amirreza Joudaki, Sahar Banisharif, Farhad Eskandari, Zeinab Cho, Jinwoo Moghadam, Ghasem Rezania, Shahabaldin Comparison of Azithromycin Removal from Water Using UV Radiation, Fe (VI) Oxidation Process and ZnO Nanoparticles |
title | Comparison of Azithromycin Removal from Water Using UV Radiation, Fe (VI) Oxidation Process and ZnO Nanoparticles |
title_full | Comparison of Azithromycin Removal from Water Using UV Radiation, Fe (VI) Oxidation Process and ZnO Nanoparticles |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Azithromycin Removal from Water Using UV Radiation, Fe (VI) Oxidation Process and ZnO Nanoparticles |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Azithromycin Removal from Water Using UV Radiation, Fe (VI) Oxidation Process and ZnO Nanoparticles |
title_short | Comparison of Azithromycin Removal from Water Using UV Radiation, Fe (VI) Oxidation Process and ZnO Nanoparticles |
title_sort | comparison of azithromycin removal from water using uv radiation, fe (vi) oxidation process and zno nanoparticles |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7084330/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32182710 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17051758 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT talaiekhozaniamirreza comparisonofazithromycinremovalfromwaterusinguvradiationfevioxidationprocessandznonanoparticles AT joudakisahar comparisonofazithromycinremovalfromwaterusinguvradiationfevioxidationprocessandznonanoparticles AT banishariffarhad comparisonofazithromycinremovalfromwaterusinguvradiationfevioxidationprocessandznonanoparticles AT eskandarizeinab comparisonofazithromycinremovalfromwaterusinguvradiationfevioxidationprocessandznonanoparticles AT chojinwoo comparisonofazithromycinremovalfromwaterusinguvradiationfevioxidationprocessandznonanoparticles AT moghadamghasem comparisonofazithromycinremovalfromwaterusinguvradiationfevioxidationprocessandznonanoparticles AT rezaniashahabaldin comparisonofazithromycinremovalfromwaterusinguvradiationfevioxidationprocessandznonanoparticles |