Cargando…

Analysis of Caesarean Section Rates Using the Robson Classification System at a University Hospital in Spain

Background: The WHO recommends the use of the Robson ten-group classification system (RTGCS) as an effective monitoring and analysis tool to assess the use of caesarean sections (CS). The present study aimed to conduct an analysis of births using the RTGCS in La Ribera University Hospital over nine...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vila-Candel, Rafael, Martín, Anna, Escuriet, Ramón, Castro-Sánchez, Enrique, Soriano-Vidal, Francisco Javier
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7084406/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32121364
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17051575
_version_ 1783508714318200832
author Vila-Candel, Rafael
Martín, Anna
Escuriet, Ramón
Castro-Sánchez, Enrique
Soriano-Vidal, Francisco Javier
author_facet Vila-Candel, Rafael
Martín, Anna
Escuriet, Ramón
Castro-Sánchez, Enrique
Soriano-Vidal, Francisco Javier
author_sort Vila-Candel, Rafael
collection PubMed
description Background: The WHO recommends the use of the Robson ten-group classification system (RTGCS) as an effective monitoring and analysis tool to assess the use of caesarean sections (CS). The present study aimed to conduct an analysis of births using the RTGCS in La Ribera University Hospital over nine years and to assess the levels and trends of CS births. Methods: Retrospective study between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2018. All eligible women were allocated in RTGCS to determine the absolute and relative contribution made by each group to the overall CS rate; linear regression and weighted least squares regression analysis were used to analyze trends over time. The risk of CS of women with induced versus spontaneous onset of labor was calculated with an odds ratio (OR) with a 95% CI. Results: 16,506 women gave birth during the study period, 19% of them by CS. Overall, 20.4% of women were in group 1 (nulliparous, singleton cephalic, term, spontaneous labor), 29.4% in group 2 (nulliparous, singleton cephalic, term, induced labor or caesarean before labor), and 12.8% in group 4 (multiparous, singleton cephalic, term, induced or caesarean delivery before labor) made the most significant contributions to the overall rate of CS; Conclusions: In our study, Robson Groups 1, 2, and 4, were identified as the main contributors to the hospital’s overall CS rate. The RTGCS provides an easy way of collecting information about the CS rate, is a valuable clinical method that allows standardized comparison of data, and time point, and identifies the groups driving changes in CS rates.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7084406
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70844062020-03-24 Analysis of Caesarean Section Rates Using the Robson Classification System at a University Hospital in Spain Vila-Candel, Rafael Martín, Anna Escuriet, Ramón Castro-Sánchez, Enrique Soriano-Vidal, Francisco Javier Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Background: The WHO recommends the use of the Robson ten-group classification system (RTGCS) as an effective monitoring and analysis tool to assess the use of caesarean sections (CS). The present study aimed to conduct an analysis of births using the RTGCS in La Ribera University Hospital over nine years and to assess the levels and trends of CS births. Methods: Retrospective study between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2018. All eligible women were allocated in RTGCS to determine the absolute and relative contribution made by each group to the overall CS rate; linear regression and weighted least squares regression analysis were used to analyze trends over time. The risk of CS of women with induced versus spontaneous onset of labor was calculated with an odds ratio (OR) with a 95% CI. Results: 16,506 women gave birth during the study period, 19% of them by CS. Overall, 20.4% of women were in group 1 (nulliparous, singleton cephalic, term, spontaneous labor), 29.4% in group 2 (nulliparous, singleton cephalic, term, induced labor or caesarean before labor), and 12.8% in group 4 (multiparous, singleton cephalic, term, induced or caesarean delivery before labor) made the most significant contributions to the overall rate of CS; Conclusions: In our study, Robson Groups 1, 2, and 4, were identified as the main contributors to the hospital’s overall CS rate. The RTGCS provides an easy way of collecting information about the CS rate, is a valuable clinical method that allows standardized comparison of data, and time point, and identifies the groups driving changes in CS rates. MDPI 2020-02-29 2020-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7084406/ /pubmed/32121364 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17051575 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Vila-Candel, Rafael
Martín, Anna
Escuriet, Ramón
Castro-Sánchez, Enrique
Soriano-Vidal, Francisco Javier
Analysis of Caesarean Section Rates Using the Robson Classification System at a University Hospital in Spain
title Analysis of Caesarean Section Rates Using the Robson Classification System at a University Hospital in Spain
title_full Analysis of Caesarean Section Rates Using the Robson Classification System at a University Hospital in Spain
title_fullStr Analysis of Caesarean Section Rates Using the Robson Classification System at a University Hospital in Spain
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of Caesarean Section Rates Using the Robson Classification System at a University Hospital in Spain
title_short Analysis of Caesarean Section Rates Using the Robson Classification System at a University Hospital in Spain
title_sort analysis of caesarean section rates using the robson classification system at a university hospital in spain
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7084406/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32121364
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17051575
work_keys_str_mv AT vilacandelrafael analysisofcaesareansectionratesusingtherobsonclassificationsystematauniversityhospitalinspain
AT martinanna analysisofcaesareansectionratesusingtherobsonclassificationsystematauniversityhospitalinspain
AT escurietramon analysisofcaesareansectionratesusingtherobsonclassificationsystematauniversityhospitalinspain
AT castrosanchezenrique analysisofcaesareansectionratesusingtherobsonclassificationsystematauniversityhospitalinspain
AT sorianovidalfranciscojavier analysisofcaesareansectionratesusingtherobsonclassificationsystematauniversityhospitalinspain