Cargando…

Comparison of Different Cervical Finish Lines of All-Ceramic Crowns on Primary Molars in Finite Element Analysis

This study aimed to conduct a stress analysis of four types of cervical finish lines in posterior all-ceramic crowns on the primary roots of molar teeth. Four different types of finish lines (shoulder 0.5 mm, feather-edged, chamfer 0.6 mm, and mini chamfer 0.4 mm) and two all-ceramic crown materials...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pan, Chin-Yun, Lan, Ting-Hsun, Liu, Pao-Hsin, Fu, Wan-Ru
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7084989/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32121586
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13051094
_version_ 1783508850103549952
author Pan, Chin-Yun
Lan, Ting-Hsun
Liu, Pao-Hsin
Fu, Wan-Ru
author_facet Pan, Chin-Yun
Lan, Ting-Hsun
Liu, Pao-Hsin
Fu, Wan-Ru
author_sort Pan, Chin-Yun
collection PubMed
description This study aimed to conduct a stress analysis of four types of cervical finish lines in posterior all-ceramic crowns on the primary roots of molar teeth. Four different types of finish lines (shoulder 0.5 mm, feather-edged, chamfer 0.6 mm, and mini chamfer 0.4 mm) and two all-ceramic crown materials (zirconia and lithium disilicate) were used to construct eight finite element primary tooth models with full-coverage crowns. A load of 200 N was applied at two different loading angles (0° and 15°) so as to mimic children’s masticatory force and occlusal tendency. The maximum stress distribution from the three-dimensional finite element models was determined, and the main effect of each factor (loading type, material, and finish line types) was evaluated in terms of the stress values for all of the models. The results indicated that the loading type (90.25%) was the main factor influencing the maximum stress value of the primary root, and that the feather-edged margin showed the highest stress value (p = 0.002). In conclusion, shoulder and chamfer types of finish lines with a 0.4–0.6 mm thickness are recommended for deciduous tooth preparation, according to the biomechanical analysis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7084989
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70849892020-03-23 Comparison of Different Cervical Finish Lines of All-Ceramic Crowns on Primary Molars in Finite Element Analysis Pan, Chin-Yun Lan, Ting-Hsun Liu, Pao-Hsin Fu, Wan-Ru Materials (Basel) Article This study aimed to conduct a stress analysis of four types of cervical finish lines in posterior all-ceramic crowns on the primary roots of molar teeth. Four different types of finish lines (shoulder 0.5 mm, feather-edged, chamfer 0.6 mm, and mini chamfer 0.4 mm) and two all-ceramic crown materials (zirconia and lithium disilicate) were used to construct eight finite element primary tooth models with full-coverage crowns. A load of 200 N was applied at two different loading angles (0° and 15°) so as to mimic children’s masticatory force and occlusal tendency. The maximum stress distribution from the three-dimensional finite element models was determined, and the main effect of each factor (loading type, material, and finish line types) was evaluated in terms of the stress values for all of the models. The results indicated that the loading type (90.25%) was the main factor influencing the maximum stress value of the primary root, and that the feather-edged margin showed the highest stress value (p = 0.002). In conclusion, shoulder and chamfer types of finish lines with a 0.4–0.6 mm thickness are recommended for deciduous tooth preparation, according to the biomechanical analysis. MDPI 2020-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7084989/ /pubmed/32121586 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13051094 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Pan, Chin-Yun
Lan, Ting-Hsun
Liu, Pao-Hsin
Fu, Wan-Ru
Comparison of Different Cervical Finish Lines of All-Ceramic Crowns on Primary Molars in Finite Element Analysis
title Comparison of Different Cervical Finish Lines of All-Ceramic Crowns on Primary Molars in Finite Element Analysis
title_full Comparison of Different Cervical Finish Lines of All-Ceramic Crowns on Primary Molars in Finite Element Analysis
title_fullStr Comparison of Different Cervical Finish Lines of All-Ceramic Crowns on Primary Molars in Finite Element Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Different Cervical Finish Lines of All-Ceramic Crowns on Primary Molars in Finite Element Analysis
title_short Comparison of Different Cervical Finish Lines of All-Ceramic Crowns on Primary Molars in Finite Element Analysis
title_sort comparison of different cervical finish lines of all-ceramic crowns on primary molars in finite element analysis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7084989/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32121586
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13051094
work_keys_str_mv AT panchinyun comparisonofdifferentcervicalfinishlinesofallceramiccrownsonprimarymolarsinfiniteelementanalysis
AT lantinghsun comparisonofdifferentcervicalfinishlinesofallceramiccrownsonprimarymolarsinfiniteelementanalysis
AT liupaohsin comparisonofdifferentcervicalfinishlinesofallceramiccrownsonprimarymolarsinfiniteelementanalysis
AT fuwanru comparisonofdifferentcervicalfinishlinesofallceramiccrownsonprimarymolarsinfiniteelementanalysis