Predictors of Leisure Participation in 6 to 14-Year-Old Children with Cerebral Palsy: Structural Equation Modeling

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to test a model of child, family and environment and identify factors affecting the intensity of leisure participation by children with cerebral palsy (CP). MATERIALS & METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, 232 children with cerebral palsy (141 boys and 91 girls), aged 6 to 14 years old and their parents were selected from four schools of children with special needs and five rehabilitation centers through the convenience sampling method in Shiraz, Iran. To evaluate the intensity of leisure participation, we used the Persian version of Children’s Assessment of Participation and Enjoyment (CAPE) completed by the participants. Demographic form, Craig Hospital Inventory of Environmental Factors (CHIEF), Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ), Family Environmental Scale (FES), SPARCLE cognitive level and parents' version of Gross Motor Function Classification System, Manual Ability Classification System and Communication Function Classification System were sent to the parents with some necessary explanations. Structural equation modeling was used to test the model hypothesis. SPSS version 18 and AMOS version 16 were used for data analysis. RESULTS: Comparative fit indexes indicated a moderate to good model fit. The presented model explained 44% of the variance in the intensity of participation. Constructs such as Family Activity Orientation with standardized total effect of 0.31 and path coefficients of P< .05 showed the most significant direct effect on participation, followed by higher gross motor function (-.26), higher manual ability (-.19), communication function (-.17), higher cognitive level (-.16), more siblings in the family (.15) and less emotional-behavioral problems (-.15). Family structures and relationships (.17) and unsupportive environment constructs (-.14) demonstrated an indirect but significant effect (P< .05). The relationship of family education level and income with participation was not significant (P>.05). CONCLUSION: The intensity of CP children’s participation is influenced by child, family and environmental factors. Parents' knowledge of recreational activities and their preference to participate in leisure and recreational activities provide children more opportunities to participate. Higher gross motor function, manual ability, and communication function also play an important role in their participation. Family structure means family cohesion, roles organization, and conflicts between family members and encountering physical, attitudinal and structural barriers at home and community indirectly impact children’s participation pattern. To enhance children’s participation, we suggest therapists to support children’s behaviors, family relationships and involvement in community activities and optimize physical function of children with limitations in self-mobility.