Cargando…

A Comparative Analysis of Data Augmentation Approaches for Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Scan Images of Brain Tumor

INTRODUCTION: Machine Learning (ML) is a rapidly growing subfield of Artificial Intelligence (AI). It is used for different purposes in our daily life such as face recognition, speech recognition, text translation in different languages, weather prediction, and business prediction. In parallel, ML a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Safdar, Muhammad Farhan, Alkobaisi, Shayma Saad, Zahra, Fatima Tuz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Academy of Medical sciences 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7085309/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32210512
http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/aim.2020.28.29-36
_version_ 1783508917211365376
author Safdar, Muhammad Farhan
Alkobaisi, Shayma Saad
Zahra, Fatima Tuz
author_facet Safdar, Muhammad Farhan
Alkobaisi, Shayma Saad
Zahra, Fatima Tuz
author_sort Safdar, Muhammad Farhan
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Machine Learning (ML) is a rapidly growing subfield of Artificial Intelligence (AI). It is used for different purposes in our daily life such as face recognition, speech recognition, text translation in different languages, weather prediction, and business prediction. In parallel, ML also plays an important role in the medical domain such as in medical imaging. ML has various algorithms that need to be trained with large volumes of data to produce a well-trained model for prediction. AIM: The aim of this study is to highlight the most suitable Data Augmentation (DA) technique(s) for medical imaging based on their results. METHODS: DA refers to different approaches that are used to increase the size of datasets. In this study, eight DA approaches were used on publicly available low-grade glioma tumor datasets obtained from the Tumor Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA) repository. The dataset included 1961 MRI brain scan images of low-grade glioma patients. You Only Look Once (YOLO) version 3 model was trained on the original dataset and the augmented datasets separately. A neural network training/testing ecosystem named as supervisely with Tesla K80 GPU was used for YOLO v3 model training on all datasets. RESULTS: The results showed that the DA techniques rotate at 180o and rotate at 90o performed the best as data enhancement techniques for medical imaging. CONCLUSION: Rotation techniques are found significant to enhance the low volume of medical imaging datasets.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7085309
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Academy of Medical sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70853092020-03-24 A Comparative Analysis of Data Augmentation Approaches for Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Scan Images of Brain Tumor Safdar, Muhammad Farhan Alkobaisi, Shayma Saad Zahra, Fatima Tuz Acta Inform Med Original Paper INTRODUCTION: Machine Learning (ML) is a rapidly growing subfield of Artificial Intelligence (AI). It is used for different purposes in our daily life such as face recognition, speech recognition, text translation in different languages, weather prediction, and business prediction. In parallel, ML also plays an important role in the medical domain such as in medical imaging. ML has various algorithms that need to be trained with large volumes of data to produce a well-trained model for prediction. AIM: The aim of this study is to highlight the most suitable Data Augmentation (DA) technique(s) for medical imaging based on their results. METHODS: DA refers to different approaches that are used to increase the size of datasets. In this study, eight DA approaches were used on publicly available low-grade glioma tumor datasets obtained from the Tumor Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA) repository. The dataset included 1961 MRI brain scan images of low-grade glioma patients. You Only Look Once (YOLO) version 3 model was trained on the original dataset and the augmented datasets separately. A neural network training/testing ecosystem named as supervisely with Tesla K80 GPU was used for YOLO v3 model training on all datasets. RESULTS: The results showed that the DA techniques rotate at 180o and rotate at 90o performed the best as data enhancement techniques for medical imaging. CONCLUSION: Rotation techniques are found significant to enhance the low volume of medical imaging datasets. Academy of Medical sciences 2020-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7085309/ /pubmed/32210512 http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/aim.2020.28.29-36 Text en © 2020 Muhammad Farhan Safdar, Shayma Saad Al Kobaisi, Fatima Tuz Zahra http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Safdar, Muhammad Farhan
Alkobaisi, Shayma Saad
Zahra, Fatima Tuz
A Comparative Analysis of Data Augmentation Approaches for Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Scan Images of Brain Tumor
title A Comparative Analysis of Data Augmentation Approaches for Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Scan Images of Brain Tumor
title_full A Comparative Analysis of Data Augmentation Approaches for Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Scan Images of Brain Tumor
title_fullStr A Comparative Analysis of Data Augmentation Approaches for Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Scan Images of Brain Tumor
title_full_unstemmed A Comparative Analysis of Data Augmentation Approaches for Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Scan Images of Brain Tumor
title_short A Comparative Analysis of Data Augmentation Approaches for Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Scan Images of Brain Tumor
title_sort comparative analysis of data augmentation approaches for magnetic resonance imaging (mri) scan images of brain tumor
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7085309/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32210512
http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/aim.2020.28.29-36
work_keys_str_mv AT safdarmuhammadfarhan acomparativeanalysisofdataaugmentationapproachesformagneticresonanceimagingmriscanimagesofbraintumor
AT alkobaisishaymasaad acomparativeanalysisofdataaugmentationapproachesformagneticresonanceimagingmriscanimagesofbraintumor
AT zahrafatimatuz acomparativeanalysisofdataaugmentationapproachesformagneticresonanceimagingmriscanimagesofbraintumor
AT safdarmuhammadfarhan comparativeanalysisofdataaugmentationapproachesformagneticresonanceimagingmriscanimagesofbraintumor
AT alkobaisishaymasaad comparativeanalysisofdataaugmentationapproachesformagneticresonanceimagingmriscanimagesofbraintumor
AT zahrafatimatuz comparativeanalysisofdataaugmentationapproachesformagneticresonanceimagingmriscanimagesofbraintumor