Cargando…

The Comparison of Clustering Algorithms K-Means and Fuzzy C-Means for Segmentation Retinal Blood Vessels

INTRODUCTION: The segmentation method has a number of approaches, one of which is clustering. The clustering method is widely used for segmenting retinal blood vessels, especially the k-mean algorithm and fuzzy c-means (FCM). Unfortunately, so far there have been no studies comparing the two methods...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wiharto, Wiharto, Suryani, Esti
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Academy of Medical sciences 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7085333/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32210514
http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/aim.2020.28.42-47
_version_ 1783508922363019264
author Wiharto, Wiharto
Suryani, Esti
author_facet Wiharto, Wiharto
Suryani, Esti
author_sort Wiharto, Wiharto
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The segmentation method has a number of approaches, one of which is clustering. The clustering method is widely used for segmenting retinal blood vessels, especially the k-mean algorithm and fuzzy c-means (FCM). Unfortunately, so far there have been no studies comparing the two methods for blood vessel segmentation. Many studies do not explain the reason for choosing the method. AIM: This study aims to analyze the performance of the algorithms of k-means and FCM for retinal blood vessel segmentation. METHODS: This research method is divided into three stages, namely preprocessing, segmentation, and performance analysis. Preprocessing uses the green channel method, Contrast-limited adaptive histogram equalization (CLAHE) and median filter. Segmentation is divided into three processes, namely clustering, thresholding and determining the region of interest (ROI). In the thresholding process, the determination of the threshold value uses two methods, namely the mean and the median. The third stage performs performance analysis using the performance parameters of the area under the curve (AUC) and statistical tests. RESULTS: The statistical test results comparing FCM with k-means based on AUC values resulted in p-values <0.05 with a confidence level of 95%. CONCLUSION: Retinal vascular segmentation with the FCM method is significantly better than k-means.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7085333
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Academy of Medical sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70853332020-03-24 The Comparison of Clustering Algorithms K-Means and Fuzzy C-Means for Segmentation Retinal Blood Vessels Wiharto, Wiharto Suryani, Esti Acta Inform Med Original Paper INTRODUCTION: The segmentation method has a number of approaches, one of which is clustering. The clustering method is widely used for segmenting retinal blood vessels, especially the k-mean algorithm and fuzzy c-means (FCM). Unfortunately, so far there have been no studies comparing the two methods for blood vessel segmentation. Many studies do not explain the reason for choosing the method. AIM: This study aims to analyze the performance of the algorithms of k-means and FCM for retinal blood vessel segmentation. METHODS: This research method is divided into three stages, namely preprocessing, segmentation, and performance analysis. Preprocessing uses the green channel method, Contrast-limited adaptive histogram equalization (CLAHE) and median filter. Segmentation is divided into three processes, namely clustering, thresholding and determining the region of interest (ROI). In the thresholding process, the determination of the threshold value uses two methods, namely the mean and the median. The third stage performs performance analysis using the performance parameters of the area under the curve (AUC) and statistical tests. RESULTS: The statistical test results comparing FCM with k-means based on AUC values resulted in p-values <0.05 with a confidence level of 95%. CONCLUSION: Retinal vascular segmentation with the FCM method is significantly better than k-means. Academy of Medical sciences 2020-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7085333/ /pubmed/32210514 http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/aim.2020.28.42-47 Text en © 2020 Wiharto Wiharto, Esti Suryani http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Wiharto, Wiharto
Suryani, Esti
The Comparison of Clustering Algorithms K-Means and Fuzzy C-Means for Segmentation Retinal Blood Vessels
title The Comparison of Clustering Algorithms K-Means and Fuzzy C-Means for Segmentation Retinal Blood Vessels
title_full The Comparison of Clustering Algorithms K-Means and Fuzzy C-Means for Segmentation Retinal Blood Vessels
title_fullStr The Comparison of Clustering Algorithms K-Means and Fuzzy C-Means for Segmentation Retinal Blood Vessels
title_full_unstemmed The Comparison of Clustering Algorithms K-Means and Fuzzy C-Means for Segmentation Retinal Blood Vessels
title_short The Comparison of Clustering Algorithms K-Means and Fuzzy C-Means for Segmentation Retinal Blood Vessels
title_sort comparison of clustering algorithms k-means and fuzzy c-means for segmentation retinal blood vessels
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7085333/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32210514
http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/aim.2020.28.42-47
work_keys_str_mv AT wihartowiharto thecomparisonofclusteringalgorithmskmeansandfuzzycmeansforsegmentationretinalbloodvessels
AT suryaniesti thecomparisonofclusteringalgorithmskmeansandfuzzycmeansforsegmentationretinalbloodvessels
AT wihartowiharto comparisonofclusteringalgorithmskmeansandfuzzycmeansforsegmentationretinalbloodvessels
AT suryaniesti comparisonofclusteringalgorithmskmeansandfuzzycmeansforsegmentationretinalbloodvessels