Cargando…

A Bibliometric Analysis of Nonspecific Low Back Pain Research

BACKGROUND: Researchers are highly interested in the study of nonspecific low back pain (NSLBP). However, few have attempted to collect global data, analyze the emerging trends, and conduct reviews from the perspectives of visualization and bibliometrics. PURPOSE: We aimed to evaluate research situa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Weng, Lin-Man, Zheng, Yi-Li, Peng, Meng-Si, Chang, Tian-Tian, Wu, Bao, Wang, Xue-Qiang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7085391/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32215136
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/5396734
_version_ 1783508935023525888
author Weng, Lin-Man
Zheng, Yi-Li
Peng, Meng-Si
Chang, Tian-Tian
Wu, Bao
Wang, Xue-Qiang
author_facet Weng, Lin-Man
Zheng, Yi-Li
Peng, Meng-Si
Chang, Tian-Tian
Wu, Bao
Wang, Xue-Qiang
author_sort Weng, Lin-Man
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Researchers are highly interested in the study of nonspecific low back pain (NSLBP). However, few have attempted to collect global data, analyze the emerging trends, and conduct reviews from the perspectives of visualization and bibliometrics. PURPOSE: We aimed to evaluate research situation and capture subsequent developmental dynamics regarding NSLBP via CiteSpace. METHODS: Publications on NSLBP in recent 19 years were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC). We used CiteSpace to analyze publication outputs, document types, countries, institutions, journals, authors, references, and keywords. Knowledge foundation, hot topics, and future direction were then stated. RESULTS: A total of 1099 papers were collected, and the trend of annual publications maintained growth with small fluctuations. Australia (188) and the University of Sydney (76) were the most prolific country and institution, respectively. The Netherlands (0.84) and the University of Sydney (0.47) had the maximum centrality, thus indicating that they have importance in this field. The journal Spine (publication: 87, cocitation counts: 942) ranked first in terms of the volume of publications and cocitation counts. Maher CG (52) who published the most papers and Waddell G (286) who was cited most frequently were the leading authors, thus making strong academic influences. “Motor control exercise” was the largest cluster, which contained most related research articles. 14 references with the strongest citation counts were cited until 2018, thus implying the future development trend. Current hotspots were treatment, meta-analysis, method, and risk factors. Spine, efficacy, adult, and meta-analysis can be regarded as research frontiers. CONCLUSION: This study offers insights into the trend of NSLBP to determine major research countries and institutions, core journals, pivotal authors, overall development tendency, hot topics, and research frontiers. Moreover, it will help researchers extract hidden valuable information for further study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7085391
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70853912020-03-25 A Bibliometric Analysis of Nonspecific Low Back Pain Research Weng, Lin-Man Zheng, Yi-Li Peng, Meng-Si Chang, Tian-Tian Wu, Bao Wang, Xue-Qiang Pain Res Manag Research Article BACKGROUND: Researchers are highly interested in the study of nonspecific low back pain (NSLBP). However, few have attempted to collect global data, analyze the emerging trends, and conduct reviews from the perspectives of visualization and bibliometrics. PURPOSE: We aimed to evaluate research situation and capture subsequent developmental dynamics regarding NSLBP via CiteSpace. METHODS: Publications on NSLBP in recent 19 years were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC). We used CiteSpace to analyze publication outputs, document types, countries, institutions, journals, authors, references, and keywords. Knowledge foundation, hot topics, and future direction were then stated. RESULTS: A total of 1099 papers were collected, and the trend of annual publications maintained growth with small fluctuations. Australia (188) and the University of Sydney (76) were the most prolific country and institution, respectively. The Netherlands (0.84) and the University of Sydney (0.47) had the maximum centrality, thus indicating that they have importance in this field. The journal Spine (publication: 87, cocitation counts: 942) ranked first in terms of the volume of publications and cocitation counts. Maher CG (52) who published the most papers and Waddell G (286) who was cited most frequently were the leading authors, thus making strong academic influences. “Motor control exercise” was the largest cluster, which contained most related research articles. 14 references with the strongest citation counts were cited until 2018, thus implying the future development trend. Current hotspots were treatment, meta-analysis, method, and risk factors. Spine, efficacy, adult, and meta-analysis can be regarded as research frontiers. CONCLUSION: This study offers insights into the trend of NSLBP to determine major research countries and institutions, core journals, pivotal authors, overall development tendency, hot topics, and research frontiers. Moreover, it will help researchers extract hidden valuable information for further study. Hindawi 2020-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7085391/ /pubmed/32215136 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/5396734 Text en Copyright © 2020 Lin-Man Weng et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Weng, Lin-Man
Zheng, Yi-Li
Peng, Meng-Si
Chang, Tian-Tian
Wu, Bao
Wang, Xue-Qiang
A Bibliometric Analysis of Nonspecific Low Back Pain Research
title A Bibliometric Analysis of Nonspecific Low Back Pain Research
title_full A Bibliometric Analysis of Nonspecific Low Back Pain Research
title_fullStr A Bibliometric Analysis of Nonspecific Low Back Pain Research
title_full_unstemmed A Bibliometric Analysis of Nonspecific Low Back Pain Research
title_short A Bibliometric Analysis of Nonspecific Low Back Pain Research
title_sort bibliometric analysis of nonspecific low back pain research
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7085391/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32215136
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/5396734
work_keys_str_mv AT wenglinman abibliometricanalysisofnonspecificlowbackpainresearch
AT zhengyili abibliometricanalysisofnonspecificlowbackpainresearch
AT pengmengsi abibliometricanalysisofnonspecificlowbackpainresearch
AT changtiantian abibliometricanalysisofnonspecificlowbackpainresearch
AT wubao abibliometricanalysisofnonspecificlowbackpainresearch
AT wangxueqiang abibliometricanalysisofnonspecificlowbackpainresearch
AT wenglinman bibliometricanalysisofnonspecificlowbackpainresearch
AT zhengyili bibliometricanalysisofnonspecificlowbackpainresearch
AT pengmengsi bibliometricanalysisofnonspecificlowbackpainresearch
AT changtiantian bibliometricanalysisofnonspecificlowbackpainresearch
AT wubao bibliometricanalysisofnonspecificlowbackpainresearch
AT wangxueqiang bibliometricanalysisofnonspecificlowbackpainresearch