Cargando…

Machine Learning-Based Gully Erosion Susceptibility Mapping: A Case Study of Eastern India

Gully erosion is a form of natural disaster and one of the land loss mechanisms causing severe problems worldwide. This study aims to delineate the areas with the most severe gully erosion susceptibility (GES) using the machine learning techniques Random Forest (RF), Gradient Boosted Regression Tree...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Saha, Sunil, Roy, Jagabandhu, Arabameri, Alireza, Blaschke, Thomas, Tien Bui, Dieu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7085763/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32121238
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20051313
_version_ 1783509007467544576
author Saha, Sunil
Roy, Jagabandhu
Arabameri, Alireza
Blaschke, Thomas
Tien Bui, Dieu
author_facet Saha, Sunil
Roy, Jagabandhu
Arabameri, Alireza
Blaschke, Thomas
Tien Bui, Dieu
author_sort Saha, Sunil
collection PubMed
description Gully erosion is a form of natural disaster and one of the land loss mechanisms causing severe problems worldwide. This study aims to delineate the areas with the most severe gully erosion susceptibility (GES) using the machine learning techniques Random Forest (RF), Gradient Boosted Regression Tree (GBRT), Naïve Bayes Tree (NBT), and Tree Ensemble (TE). The gully inventory map (GIM) consists of 120 gullies. Of the 120 gullies, 84 gullies (70%) were used for training and 36 gullies (30%) were used to validate the models. Fourteen gully conditioning factors (GCFs) were used for GES modeling and the relationships between the GCFs and gully erosion was assessed using the weight-of-evidence (WofE) model. The GES maps were prepared using RF, GBRT, NBT, and TE and were validated using area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve, the seed cell area index (SCAI) and five statistical measures including precision (PPV), false discovery rate (FDR), accuracy, mean absolute error (MAE), and root mean squared error (RMSE). Nearly 7% of the basin has high to very high susceptibility for gully erosion. Validation results proved the excellent ability of these models to predict the GES. Of the analyzed models, the RF (AUROC = 0.96, PPV = 1.00, FDR = 0.00, accuracy = 0.87, MAE = 0.11, RMSE = 0.19 for validation dataset) is accurate enough for modeling and better suited for GES modeling than the other models. Therefore, the RF model can be used to model the GES areas not only in this river basin but also in other areas with the same geo-environmental conditions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7085763
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70857632020-03-25 Machine Learning-Based Gully Erosion Susceptibility Mapping: A Case Study of Eastern India Saha, Sunil Roy, Jagabandhu Arabameri, Alireza Blaschke, Thomas Tien Bui, Dieu Sensors (Basel) Article Gully erosion is a form of natural disaster and one of the land loss mechanisms causing severe problems worldwide. This study aims to delineate the areas with the most severe gully erosion susceptibility (GES) using the machine learning techniques Random Forest (RF), Gradient Boosted Regression Tree (GBRT), Naïve Bayes Tree (NBT), and Tree Ensemble (TE). The gully inventory map (GIM) consists of 120 gullies. Of the 120 gullies, 84 gullies (70%) were used for training and 36 gullies (30%) were used to validate the models. Fourteen gully conditioning factors (GCFs) were used for GES modeling and the relationships between the GCFs and gully erosion was assessed using the weight-of-evidence (WofE) model. The GES maps were prepared using RF, GBRT, NBT, and TE and were validated using area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve, the seed cell area index (SCAI) and five statistical measures including precision (PPV), false discovery rate (FDR), accuracy, mean absolute error (MAE), and root mean squared error (RMSE). Nearly 7% of the basin has high to very high susceptibility for gully erosion. Validation results proved the excellent ability of these models to predict the GES. Of the analyzed models, the RF (AUROC = 0.96, PPV = 1.00, FDR = 0.00, accuracy = 0.87, MAE = 0.11, RMSE = 0.19 for validation dataset) is accurate enough for modeling and better suited for GES modeling than the other models. Therefore, the RF model can be used to model the GES areas not only in this river basin but also in other areas with the same geo-environmental conditions. MDPI 2020-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7085763/ /pubmed/32121238 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20051313 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Saha, Sunil
Roy, Jagabandhu
Arabameri, Alireza
Blaschke, Thomas
Tien Bui, Dieu
Machine Learning-Based Gully Erosion Susceptibility Mapping: A Case Study of Eastern India
title Machine Learning-Based Gully Erosion Susceptibility Mapping: A Case Study of Eastern India
title_full Machine Learning-Based Gully Erosion Susceptibility Mapping: A Case Study of Eastern India
title_fullStr Machine Learning-Based Gully Erosion Susceptibility Mapping: A Case Study of Eastern India
title_full_unstemmed Machine Learning-Based Gully Erosion Susceptibility Mapping: A Case Study of Eastern India
title_short Machine Learning-Based Gully Erosion Susceptibility Mapping: A Case Study of Eastern India
title_sort machine learning-based gully erosion susceptibility mapping: a case study of eastern india
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7085763/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32121238
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20051313
work_keys_str_mv AT sahasunil machinelearningbasedgullyerosionsusceptibilitymappingacasestudyofeasternindia
AT royjagabandhu machinelearningbasedgullyerosionsusceptibilitymappingacasestudyofeasternindia
AT arabamerialireza machinelearningbasedgullyerosionsusceptibilitymappingacasestudyofeasternindia
AT blaschkethomas machinelearningbasedgullyerosionsusceptibilitymappingacasestudyofeasternindia
AT tienbuidieu machinelearningbasedgullyerosionsusceptibilitymappingacasestudyofeasternindia