Cargando…

Tissue-engineered bone used in a rabbit model of lumbar intertransverse process fusion: A comparison of osteogenic capacity between two different stem cells

Spinal fusion serves an important role in the reconstruction of spinal stability via restoration of the normal spinal sequence and relief of pain. Studies have demonstrated that the fusion rate is mainly associated with the osteogenic capacity of the implanted graft. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) ha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Hai, Zhou, Yue, Li, Chang-Qing, Chu, Tong-Wei, Wang, Jian, Huang, Bo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: D.A. Spandidos 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7086144/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32256736
http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/etm.2020.8523
_version_ 1783509067264688128
author Wang, Hai
Zhou, Yue
Li, Chang-Qing
Chu, Tong-Wei
Wang, Jian
Huang, Bo
author_facet Wang, Hai
Zhou, Yue
Li, Chang-Qing
Chu, Tong-Wei
Wang, Jian
Huang, Bo
author_sort Wang, Hai
collection PubMed
description Spinal fusion serves an important role in the reconstruction of spinal stability via restoration of the normal spinal sequence and relief of pain. Studies have demonstrated that the fusion rate is mainly associated with the osteogenic capacity of the implanted graft. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have been successfully isolated from human degenerated cartilage endplate (CEP) and designated as CEP-derived stem cells (CESCs). Previous studies have suggested that CESCs possesses in vitro and in vivo chondrogenic potential superior to that of bone marrow (BM)-MSCs. In addition, CESCs have shown a stronger in vitro osteogenic ability. The present study aimed to further determine the in vivo three-dimensional osteogenesis efficacy of CESCs for spinal fusion. Tissue-engineered bone grafts were transplanted into a rabbit model of posterolateral lumbar intertransverse process fusion using CESCs and BM-MSCs as seed cells composited with porous hydroxyapatite (PHA). The results of manual palpation and computed tomography (CT) scan reconstruction indicated that the CESCs/PHA group had a higher fusion rate than the BM-MSCs/PHA group, although the difference was not observed to be statistically significant. In addition, RT-qPCR results revealed that the in vitro CESCs/PHA composite expressed significantly higher levels of osteogenic-specific mRNA compared with the BM-MSCs/PHA composite. Finally, micro-CT and semi-quantitative histological analysis further demonstrated that the newly formed bone quality of the CESCs/PHA group was significantly higher than that of the BM-MSCs/PHA group in the intertransverse process fusion model. Therefore, the study indicated that CESCs possess superior in vivo osteogenesis capacity compared with BM-MSCs, and might serve as an important alternative seed cell source for bone tissue engineering. These results may provide the foundation for a biological solution to spinal fusion or other bone defect issues.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7086144
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher D.A. Spandidos
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70861442020-04-02 Tissue-engineered bone used in a rabbit model of lumbar intertransverse process fusion: A comparison of osteogenic capacity between two different stem cells Wang, Hai Zhou, Yue Li, Chang-Qing Chu, Tong-Wei Wang, Jian Huang, Bo Exp Ther Med Articles Spinal fusion serves an important role in the reconstruction of spinal stability via restoration of the normal spinal sequence and relief of pain. Studies have demonstrated that the fusion rate is mainly associated with the osteogenic capacity of the implanted graft. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have been successfully isolated from human degenerated cartilage endplate (CEP) and designated as CEP-derived stem cells (CESCs). Previous studies have suggested that CESCs possesses in vitro and in vivo chondrogenic potential superior to that of bone marrow (BM)-MSCs. In addition, CESCs have shown a stronger in vitro osteogenic ability. The present study aimed to further determine the in vivo three-dimensional osteogenesis efficacy of CESCs for spinal fusion. Tissue-engineered bone grafts were transplanted into a rabbit model of posterolateral lumbar intertransverse process fusion using CESCs and BM-MSCs as seed cells composited with porous hydroxyapatite (PHA). The results of manual palpation and computed tomography (CT) scan reconstruction indicated that the CESCs/PHA group had a higher fusion rate than the BM-MSCs/PHA group, although the difference was not observed to be statistically significant. In addition, RT-qPCR results revealed that the in vitro CESCs/PHA composite expressed significantly higher levels of osteogenic-specific mRNA compared with the BM-MSCs/PHA composite. Finally, micro-CT and semi-quantitative histological analysis further demonstrated that the newly formed bone quality of the CESCs/PHA group was significantly higher than that of the BM-MSCs/PHA group in the intertransverse process fusion model. Therefore, the study indicated that CESCs possess superior in vivo osteogenesis capacity compared with BM-MSCs, and might serve as an important alternative seed cell source for bone tissue engineering. These results may provide the foundation for a biological solution to spinal fusion or other bone defect issues. D.A. Spandidos 2020-04 2020-02-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7086144/ /pubmed/32256736 http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/etm.2020.8523 Text en Copyright: © Wang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Articles
Wang, Hai
Zhou, Yue
Li, Chang-Qing
Chu, Tong-Wei
Wang, Jian
Huang, Bo
Tissue-engineered bone used in a rabbit model of lumbar intertransverse process fusion: A comparison of osteogenic capacity between two different stem cells
title Tissue-engineered bone used in a rabbit model of lumbar intertransverse process fusion: A comparison of osteogenic capacity between two different stem cells
title_full Tissue-engineered bone used in a rabbit model of lumbar intertransverse process fusion: A comparison of osteogenic capacity between two different stem cells
title_fullStr Tissue-engineered bone used in a rabbit model of lumbar intertransverse process fusion: A comparison of osteogenic capacity between two different stem cells
title_full_unstemmed Tissue-engineered bone used in a rabbit model of lumbar intertransverse process fusion: A comparison of osteogenic capacity between two different stem cells
title_short Tissue-engineered bone used in a rabbit model of lumbar intertransverse process fusion: A comparison of osteogenic capacity between two different stem cells
title_sort tissue-engineered bone used in a rabbit model of lumbar intertransverse process fusion: a comparison of osteogenic capacity between two different stem cells
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7086144/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32256736
http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/etm.2020.8523
work_keys_str_mv AT wanghai tissueengineeredboneusedinarabbitmodeloflumbarintertransverseprocessfusionacomparisonofosteogeniccapacitybetweentwodifferentstemcells
AT zhouyue tissueengineeredboneusedinarabbitmodeloflumbarintertransverseprocessfusionacomparisonofosteogeniccapacitybetweentwodifferentstemcells
AT lichangqing tissueengineeredboneusedinarabbitmodeloflumbarintertransverseprocessfusionacomparisonofosteogeniccapacitybetweentwodifferentstemcells
AT chutongwei tissueengineeredboneusedinarabbitmodeloflumbarintertransverseprocessfusionacomparisonofosteogeniccapacitybetweentwodifferentstemcells
AT wangjian tissueengineeredboneusedinarabbitmodeloflumbarintertransverseprocessfusionacomparisonofosteogeniccapacitybetweentwodifferentstemcells
AT huangbo tissueengineeredboneusedinarabbitmodeloflumbarintertransverseprocessfusionacomparisonofosteogeniccapacitybetweentwodifferentstemcells