Cargando…

Daily emollient during infancy for prevention of eczema: the BEEP randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Skin barrier dysfunction precedes eczema development. We tested whether daily use of emollient in the first year could prevent eczema in high-risk children. METHODS: We did a multicentre, pragmatic, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial in 12 hospitals and four primary care sites a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chalmers, Joanne R, Haines, Rachel H, Bradshaw, Lucy E, Montgomery, Alan A, Thomas, Kim S, Brown, Sara J, Ridd, Matthew J, Lawton, Sandra, Simpson, Eric L, Cork, Michael J, Sach, Tracey H, Flohr, Carsten, Mitchell, Eleanor J, Swinden, Richard, Tarr, Stella, Davies-Jones, Susan, Jay, Nicola, Kelleher, Maeve M, Perkin, Michael R, Boyle, Robert J, Williams, Hywel C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7086156/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32087126
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32984-8
_version_ 1783509069854670848
author Chalmers, Joanne R
Haines, Rachel H
Bradshaw, Lucy E
Montgomery, Alan A
Thomas, Kim S
Brown, Sara J
Ridd, Matthew J
Lawton, Sandra
Simpson, Eric L
Cork, Michael J
Sach, Tracey H
Flohr, Carsten
Mitchell, Eleanor J
Swinden, Richard
Tarr, Stella
Davies-Jones, Susan
Jay, Nicola
Kelleher, Maeve M
Perkin, Michael R
Boyle, Robert J
Williams, Hywel C
author_facet Chalmers, Joanne R
Haines, Rachel H
Bradshaw, Lucy E
Montgomery, Alan A
Thomas, Kim S
Brown, Sara J
Ridd, Matthew J
Lawton, Sandra
Simpson, Eric L
Cork, Michael J
Sach, Tracey H
Flohr, Carsten
Mitchell, Eleanor J
Swinden, Richard
Tarr, Stella
Davies-Jones, Susan
Jay, Nicola
Kelleher, Maeve M
Perkin, Michael R
Boyle, Robert J
Williams, Hywel C
author_sort Chalmers, Joanne R
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Skin barrier dysfunction precedes eczema development. We tested whether daily use of emollient in the first year could prevent eczema in high-risk children. METHODS: We did a multicentre, pragmatic, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial in 12 hospitals and four primary care sites across the UK. Families were approached via antenatal or postnatal services for recruitment of term infants (at least 37 weeks' gestation) at high risk of developing eczema (ie, at least one first-degree relative with parent-reported eczema, allergic rhinitis, or asthma, diagnosed by a doctor). Term newborns with a family history of atopic disease were randomly assigned (1:1) to application of emollient daily (either Diprobase cream or DoubleBase gel) for the first year plus standard skin-care advice (emollient group) or standard skin-care advice only (control group). The randomisation schedule was created using computer-generated code (stratified by recruiting centre and number of first-degree relatives with atopic disease) and participants were assigned to groups using an internet-based randomisation system. The primary outcome was eczema at age 2 years (defined by UK working party criteria) with analysis as randomised regardless of adherence to allocation for participants with outcome data collected, and adjusting for stratification variables. This trial is registered with ISRCTN, ISRCTN21528841. Data collection for long-term follow-up is ongoing, but the trial is closed to recruitment. FINDINGS: 1394 newborns were randomly assigned to study groups between Nov 19, 2014, and Nov 18, 2016; 693 were assigned to the emollient group and 701 to the control group. Adherence in the emollient group was 88% (466 of 532) at 3 months, 82% (427 of 519) at 6 months, and 74% (375 of 506) at 12 months in those with complete questionnaire data. At age 2 years, eczema was present in 139 (23%) of 598 infants with outcome data collected in the emollient group and 150 (25%) of 612 infants in the control group (adjusted relative risk 0·95 [95% CI 0·78 to 1·16], p=0·61; adjusted risk difference –1·2% [–5·9 to 3·6]). Other eczema definitions supported the results of the primary analysis. Mean number of skin infections per child in year 1 was 0·23 (SD 0·68) in the emollient group versus 0·15 (0·46) in the control group; adjusted incidence rate ratio 1·55 (95% CI 1·15 to 2·09). INTERPRETATION: We found no evidence that daily emollient during the first year of life prevents eczema in high-risk children and some evidence to suggest an increased risk of skin infections. Our study shows that families with eczema, asthma, or allergic rhinitis should not use daily emollients to try and prevent eczema in their newborn. FUNDING: National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7086156
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70861562020-03-25 Daily emollient during infancy for prevention of eczema: the BEEP randomised controlled trial Chalmers, Joanne R Haines, Rachel H Bradshaw, Lucy E Montgomery, Alan A Thomas, Kim S Brown, Sara J Ridd, Matthew J Lawton, Sandra Simpson, Eric L Cork, Michael J Sach, Tracey H Flohr, Carsten Mitchell, Eleanor J Swinden, Richard Tarr, Stella Davies-Jones, Susan Jay, Nicola Kelleher, Maeve M Perkin, Michael R Boyle, Robert J Williams, Hywel C Lancet Article BACKGROUND: Skin barrier dysfunction precedes eczema development. We tested whether daily use of emollient in the first year could prevent eczema in high-risk children. METHODS: We did a multicentre, pragmatic, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial in 12 hospitals and four primary care sites across the UK. Families were approached via antenatal or postnatal services for recruitment of term infants (at least 37 weeks' gestation) at high risk of developing eczema (ie, at least one first-degree relative with parent-reported eczema, allergic rhinitis, or asthma, diagnosed by a doctor). Term newborns with a family history of atopic disease were randomly assigned (1:1) to application of emollient daily (either Diprobase cream or DoubleBase gel) for the first year plus standard skin-care advice (emollient group) or standard skin-care advice only (control group). The randomisation schedule was created using computer-generated code (stratified by recruiting centre and number of first-degree relatives with atopic disease) and participants were assigned to groups using an internet-based randomisation system. The primary outcome was eczema at age 2 years (defined by UK working party criteria) with analysis as randomised regardless of adherence to allocation for participants with outcome data collected, and adjusting for stratification variables. This trial is registered with ISRCTN, ISRCTN21528841. Data collection for long-term follow-up is ongoing, but the trial is closed to recruitment. FINDINGS: 1394 newborns were randomly assigned to study groups between Nov 19, 2014, and Nov 18, 2016; 693 were assigned to the emollient group and 701 to the control group. Adherence in the emollient group was 88% (466 of 532) at 3 months, 82% (427 of 519) at 6 months, and 74% (375 of 506) at 12 months in those with complete questionnaire data. At age 2 years, eczema was present in 139 (23%) of 598 infants with outcome data collected in the emollient group and 150 (25%) of 612 infants in the control group (adjusted relative risk 0·95 [95% CI 0·78 to 1·16], p=0·61; adjusted risk difference –1·2% [–5·9 to 3·6]). Other eczema definitions supported the results of the primary analysis. Mean number of skin infections per child in year 1 was 0·23 (SD 0·68) in the emollient group versus 0·15 (0·46) in the control group; adjusted incidence rate ratio 1·55 (95% CI 1·15 to 2·09). INTERPRETATION: We found no evidence that daily emollient during the first year of life prevents eczema in high-risk children and some evidence to suggest an increased risk of skin infections. Our study shows that families with eczema, asthma, or allergic rhinitis should not use daily emollients to try and prevent eczema in their newborn. FUNDING: National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment. Elsevier 2020-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7086156/ /pubmed/32087126 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32984-8 Text en © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Chalmers, Joanne R
Haines, Rachel H
Bradshaw, Lucy E
Montgomery, Alan A
Thomas, Kim S
Brown, Sara J
Ridd, Matthew J
Lawton, Sandra
Simpson, Eric L
Cork, Michael J
Sach, Tracey H
Flohr, Carsten
Mitchell, Eleanor J
Swinden, Richard
Tarr, Stella
Davies-Jones, Susan
Jay, Nicola
Kelleher, Maeve M
Perkin, Michael R
Boyle, Robert J
Williams, Hywel C
Daily emollient during infancy for prevention of eczema: the BEEP randomised controlled trial
title Daily emollient during infancy for prevention of eczema: the BEEP randomised controlled trial
title_full Daily emollient during infancy for prevention of eczema: the BEEP randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Daily emollient during infancy for prevention of eczema: the BEEP randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Daily emollient during infancy for prevention of eczema: the BEEP randomised controlled trial
title_short Daily emollient during infancy for prevention of eczema: the BEEP randomised controlled trial
title_sort daily emollient during infancy for prevention of eczema: the beep randomised controlled trial
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7086156/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32087126
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32984-8
work_keys_str_mv AT chalmersjoanner dailyemollientduringinfancyforpreventionofeczemathebeeprandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT hainesrachelh dailyemollientduringinfancyforpreventionofeczemathebeeprandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT bradshawlucye dailyemollientduringinfancyforpreventionofeczemathebeeprandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT montgomeryalana dailyemollientduringinfancyforpreventionofeczemathebeeprandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT thomaskims dailyemollientduringinfancyforpreventionofeczemathebeeprandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT brownsaraj dailyemollientduringinfancyforpreventionofeczemathebeeprandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT riddmatthewj dailyemollientduringinfancyforpreventionofeczemathebeeprandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT lawtonsandra dailyemollientduringinfancyforpreventionofeczemathebeeprandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT simpsonericl dailyemollientduringinfancyforpreventionofeczemathebeeprandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT corkmichaelj dailyemollientduringinfancyforpreventionofeczemathebeeprandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT sachtraceyh dailyemollientduringinfancyforpreventionofeczemathebeeprandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT flohrcarsten dailyemollientduringinfancyforpreventionofeczemathebeeprandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT mitchelleleanorj dailyemollientduringinfancyforpreventionofeczemathebeeprandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT swindenrichard dailyemollientduringinfancyforpreventionofeczemathebeeprandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT tarrstella dailyemollientduringinfancyforpreventionofeczemathebeeprandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT daviesjonessusan dailyemollientduringinfancyforpreventionofeczemathebeeprandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT jaynicola dailyemollientduringinfancyforpreventionofeczemathebeeprandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT kellehermaevem dailyemollientduringinfancyforpreventionofeczemathebeeprandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT perkinmichaelr dailyemollientduringinfancyforpreventionofeczemathebeeprandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT boylerobertj dailyemollientduringinfancyforpreventionofeczemathebeeprandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT williamshywelc dailyemollientduringinfancyforpreventionofeczemathebeeprandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT dailyemollientduringinfancyforpreventionofeczemathebeeprandomisedcontrolledtrial