Cargando…

Individualized lung protective ventilation vs. conventional ventilation during general anesthesia in laparoscopic total hysterectomy

Laparoscopic total hysterectomy is performed by carbon dioxide insufflation, Trendelenburg position and mechanical ventilation of patients under general anesthesia. However, this may induce pulmonary atelectasis and/or hyperdistention of the lungs. Multiple studies have indicated that mechanical ven...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Jing, Huang, Xinhua, Hu, Siping, Meng, Zhipeng, He, Huanzhong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: D.A. Spandidos 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7086193/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32256792
http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/etm.2020.8549
_version_ 1783509077412806656
author Liu, Jing
Huang, Xinhua
Hu, Siping
Meng, Zhipeng
He, Huanzhong
author_facet Liu, Jing
Huang, Xinhua
Hu, Siping
Meng, Zhipeng
He, Huanzhong
author_sort Liu, Jing
collection PubMed
description Laparoscopic total hysterectomy is performed by carbon dioxide insufflation, Trendelenburg position and mechanical ventilation of patients under general anesthesia. However, this may induce pulmonary atelectasis and/or hyperdistention of the lungs. Multiple studies have indicated that mechanical ventilation with the use of low tidal volumes, moderate positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and regular alveolar recruitment maneuvers may improve post-operative outcomes. However, the benefits of an individualized level of PEEP have not been clearly established. In the present study, it was hypothesized that a moderate fixed PEEP may not suit all patients and an individually-titrated PEEP during anesthesia may improve the peri-operative pulmonary oxygenation function. The aim of the present study was to compare the pulmonary oxygenation function and post-operative pulmonary complications (PPCs) in patients receiving individualized lung-protective mechanical ventilation (LPV) vs. conventional ventilation (CV) during laparoscopic total hysterectomy. The present study was a randomized double-blinded clinical trial on 87 patients who were randomly divided to receive CV or protective ventilation (PV). An optimal individualized PEEP value was determined using a static pulmonary compliance-directed PEEP titration procedure. Pulmonary oxygenation function, serum inflammatory factors, including interleukin-8 and Clara cell protein 16, the incidence of PPCs and the post-operative length of stay were also determined. Patients in the PV group exhibited improved pulmonary oxygenation function during and after the operation. The total percentage of PPCs during the first 7 days after surgery was significantly lower in the PV group compared with those in the CV group. In conclusion, as compared to CV, intra-operative individualized LPV significantly improved pulmonary oxygenation function and reduced the incidence of PPCs during the first 7 days after laparoscopic total hysterectomy (Clinical trial registration no. ChiCTR1900027738).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7086193
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher D.A. Spandidos
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70861932020-04-02 Individualized lung protective ventilation vs. conventional ventilation during general anesthesia in laparoscopic total hysterectomy Liu, Jing Huang, Xinhua Hu, Siping Meng, Zhipeng He, Huanzhong Exp Ther Med Articles Laparoscopic total hysterectomy is performed by carbon dioxide insufflation, Trendelenburg position and mechanical ventilation of patients under general anesthesia. However, this may induce pulmonary atelectasis and/or hyperdistention of the lungs. Multiple studies have indicated that mechanical ventilation with the use of low tidal volumes, moderate positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and regular alveolar recruitment maneuvers may improve post-operative outcomes. However, the benefits of an individualized level of PEEP have not been clearly established. In the present study, it was hypothesized that a moderate fixed PEEP may not suit all patients and an individually-titrated PEEP during anesthesia may improve the peri-operative pulmonary oxygenation function. The aim of the present study was to compare the pulmonary oxygenation function and post-operative pulmonary complications (PPCs) in patients receiving individualized lung-protective mechanical ventilation (LPV) vs. conventional ventilation (CV) during laparoscopic total hysterectomy. The present study was a randomized double-blinded clinical trial on 87 patients who were randomly divided to receive CV or protective ventilation (PV). An optimal individualized PEEP value was determined using a static pulmonary compliance-directed PEEP titration procedure. Pulmonary oxygenation function, serum inflammatory factors, including interleukin-8 and Clara cell protein 16, the incidence of PPCs and the post-operative length of stay were also determined. Patients in the PV group exhibited improved pulmonary oxygenation function during and after the operation. The total percentage of PPCs during the first 7 days after surgery was significantly lower in the PV group compared with those in the CV group. In conclusion, as compared to CV, intra-operative individualized LPV significantly improved pulmonary oxygenation function and reduced the incidence of PPCs during the first 7 days after laparoscopic total hysterectomy (Clinical trial registration no. ChiCTR1900027738). D.A. Spandidos 2020-04 2020-02-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7086193/ /pubmed/32256792 http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/etm.2020.8549 Text en Copyright: © Liu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Articles
Liu, Jing
Huang, Xinhua
Hu, Siping
Meng, Zhipeng
He, Huanzhong
Individualized lung protective ventilation vs. conventional ventilation during general anesthesia in laparoscopic total hysterectomy
title Individualized lung protective ventilation vs. conventional ventilation during general anesthesia in laparoscopic total hysterectomy
title_full Individualized lung protective ventilation vs. conventional ventilation during general anesthesia in laparoscopic total hysterectomy
title_fullStr Individualized lung protective ventilation vs. conventional ventilation during general anesthesia in laparoscopic total hysterectomy
title_full_unstemmed Individualized lung protective ventilation vs. conventional ventilation during general anesthesia in laparoscopic total hysterectomy
title_short Individualized lung protective ventilation vs. conventional ventilation during general anesthesia in laparoscopic total hysterectomy
title_sort individualized lung protective ventilation vs. conventional ventilation during general anesthesia in laparoscopic total hysterectomy
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7086193/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32256792
http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/etm.2020.8549
work_keys_str_mv AT liujing individualizedlungprotectiveventilationvsconventionalventilationduringgeneralanesthesiainlaparoscopictotalhysterectomy
AT huangxinhua individualizedlungprotectiveventilationvsconventionalventilationduringgeneralanesthesiainlaparoscopictotalhysterectomy
AT husiping individualizedlungprotectiveventilationvsconventionalventilationduringgeneralanesthesiainlaparoscopictotalhysterectomy
AT mengzhipeng individualizedlungprotectiveventilationvsconventionalventilationduringgeneralanesthesiainlaparoscopictotalhysterectomy
AT hehuanzhong individualizedlungprotectiveventilationvsconventionalventilationduringgeneralanesthesiainlaparoscopictotalhysterectomy