Cargando…

Evaluation of infliximab as second-line treatment of acute graft versus host disease -validating response on day 7 and 28 as predictors of survival

Several immunosuppressive drugs have been proposed for second-line treatment of steroid-refractory acute graft versus host disease (aGvHD) after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. However, the studies on these drugs are small, retrospective, uncontrolled and use different endpoints....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nygaard, Marietta, Andersen, Niels Smedegaard, Moser, Claus Ernst, Olesen, Gitte, Schjødt, Ida Marie, Heilmann, Carsten, Sengeløv, Henrik
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7086567/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29391524
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41409-018-0099-3
_version_ 1783509147413643264
author Nygaard, Marietta
Andersen, Niels Smedegaard
Moser, Claus Ernst
Olesen, Gitte
Schjødt, Ida Marie
Heilmann, Carsten
Sengeløv, Henrik
author_facet Nygaard, Marietta
Andersen, Niels Smedegaard
Moser, Claus Ernst
Olesen, Gitte
Schjødt, Ida Marie
Heilmann, Carsten
Sengeløv, Henrik
author_sort Nygaard, Marietta
collection PubMed
description Several immunosuppressive drugs have been proposed for second-line treatment of steroid-refractory acute graft versus host disease (aGvHD) after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. However, the studies on these drugs are small, retrospective, uncontrolled and use different endpoints. Therefore, it remains unknown which treatment is superior. We retrospectively evaluated 68 consecutive patients treated with infliximab for aGvHD. We adhered to recently proposed guidelines for aGvHD trials and thus evaluated response on day 7 and 28. Furthermore, we assessed the composite endpoint 6 months freedom from treatment failure (6MFTF). The majority of patients had grade III-IV aGvHD. We found that 41 patients (60%) responded on day 7 and 31 patients (46%) on day 28. Twenty-four patients (35%) achieved 6MFTF. The main reasons for failure within 6 months were death (n = 31) or additional immunosuppression (n = 16). By six and 24 months, 44 and 34% of the patients were alive respectively. Patients with response to infliximab on day 7 and 28 had significantly higher overall survival (OS) probability than non-responders. We show that response on day 7 and 28 identifies high and low risk groups. Patients who fail to respond should be identified early and offered alternative therapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7086567
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70865672020-03-23 Evaluation of infliximab as second-line treatment of acute graft versus host disease -validating response on day 7 and 28 as predictors of survival Nygaard, Marietta Andersen, Niels Smedegaard Moser, Claus Ernst Olesen, Gitte Schjødt, Ida Marie Heilmann, Carsten Sengeløv, Henrik Bone Marrow Transplant Article Several immunosuppressive drugs have been proposed for second-line treatment of steroid-refractory acute graft versus host disease (aGvHD) after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. However, the studies on these drugs are small, retrospective, uncontrolled and use different endpoints. Therefore, it remains unknown which treatment is superior. We retrospectively evaluated 68 consecutive patients treated with infliximab for aGvHD. We adhered to recently proposed guidelines for aGvHD trials and thus evaluated response on day 7 and 28. Furthermore, we assessed the composite endpoint 6 months freedom from treatment failure (6MFTF). The majority of patients had grade III-IV aGvHD. We found that 41 patients (60%) responded on day 7 and 31 patients (46%) on day 28. Twenty-four patients (35%) achieved 6MFTF. The main reasons for failure within 6 months were death (n = 31) or additional immunosuppression (n = 16). By six and 24 months, 44 and 34% of the patients were alive respectively. Patients with response to infliximab on day 7 and 28 had significantly higher overall survival (OS) probability than non-responders. We show that response on day 7 and 28 identifies high and low risk groups. Patients who fail to respond should be identified early and offered alternative therapy. Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-02-01 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC7086567/ /pubmed/29391524 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41409-018-0099-3 Text en © Macmillan Publishers Limited, part of Springer Nature 2018 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Article
Nygaard, Marietta
Andersen, Niels Smedegaard
Moser, Claus Ernst
Olesen, Gitte
Schjødt, Ida Marie
Heilmann, Carsten
Sengeløv, Henrik
Evaluation of infliximab as second-line treatment of acute graft versus host disease -validating response on day 7 and 28 as predictors of survival
title Evaluation of infliximab as second-line treatment of acute graft versus host disease -validating response on day 7 and 28 as predictors of survival
title_full Evaluation of infliximab as second-line treatment of acute graft versus host disease -validating response on day 7 and 28 as predictors of survival
title_fullStr Evaluation of infliximab as second-line treatment of acute graft versus host disease -validating response on day 7 and 28 as predictors of survival
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of infliximab as second-line treatment of acute graft versus host disease -validating response on day 7 and 28 as predictors of survival
title_short Evaluation of infliximab as second-line treatment of acute graft versus host disease -validating response on day 7 and 28 as predictors of survival
title_sort evaluation of infliximab as second-line treatment of acute graft versus host disease -validating response on day 7 and 28 as predictors of survival
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7086567/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29391524
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41409-018-0099-3
work_keys_str_mv AT nygaardmarietta evaluationofinfliximabassecondlinetreatmentofacutegraftversushostdiseasevalidatingresponseonday7and28aspredictorsofsurvival
AT andersennielssmedegaard evaluationofinfliximabassecondlinetreatmentofacutegraftversushostdiseasevalidatingresponseonday7and28aspredictorsofsurvival
AT moserclausernst evaluationofinfliximabassecondlinetreatmentofacutegraftversushostdiseasevalidatingresponseonday7and28aspredictorsofsurvival
AT olesengitte evaluationofinfliximabassecondlinetreatmentofacutegraftversushostdiseasevalidatingresponseonday7and28aspredictorsofsurvival
AT schjødtidamarie evaluationofinfliximabassecondlinetreatmentofacutegraftversushostdiseasevalidatingresponseonday7and28aspredictorsofsurvival
AT heilmanncarsten evaluationofinfliximabassecondlinetreatmentofacutegraftversushostdiseasevalidatingresponseonday7and28aspredictorsofsurvival
AT sengeløvhenrik evaluationofinfliximabassecondlinetreatmentofacutegraftversushostdiseasevalidatingresponseonday7and28aspredictorsofsurvival