Cargando…

A comparison of the sensitivity and specificity of sialodacryoadenitis virus, Parker's rat coronavirus, and mouse hepatitis virus-infected cells as a source of antigen for the detection of antibody to rat coronaviruses

Sialodacryoadenitis virus (SDAV) and Parker's rat coronavirus (PRC) are two recognized viral strains which cause spontaneous disease in the laboratory rat. Currently there is no recognized practical procedure which will accurately differentiate infections with these strains. Using SDAV- and PRC...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Percy, D. H., Williams, K. L., Paturzo, F. X.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 1991
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7087136/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1877886
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01310668
_version_ 1783509274725449728
author Percy, D. H.
Williams, K. L.
Paturzo, F. X.
author_facet Percy, D. H.
Williams, K. L.
Paturzo, F. X.
author_sort Percy, D. H.
collection PubMed
description Sialodacryoadenitis virus (SDAV) and Parker's rat coronavirus (PRC) are two recognized viral strains which cause spontaneous disease in the laboratory rat. Currently there is no recognized practical procedure which will accurately differentiate infections with these strains. Using SDAV- and PRC-infected L-2 cells as the source of antigen, and sera from rats collected post inoculation with either of these viral strains, the indirect fluorescent antibody (IFA) procedure was used to determine whether antibody titers could be used to differentiate infections from the homologous and heterologous virus. There was no detectable difference in the sensitivity or specificity of these systems in detecting antibody to the homologous or heterologous virus. Thus there was no evidence that SDAV- and PRC-infected cells would serve to differentiate antibody to the homologous virus using the IFA technique. In addition, antibody titers were similar when mouse hepatitis virus (MHV)-infected cells were used as the source of antigen for the IFA technique. However, using MHV or SDAV-infected cells as the source of antigen, there was a significant difference in antibody titers to the homologous virus detected using the immunoenzyme technique.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7087136
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1991
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70871362020-03-23 A comparison of the sensitivity and specificity of sialodacryoadenitis virus, Parker's rat coronavirus, and mouse hepatitis virus-infected cells as a source of antigen for the detection of antibody to rat coronaviruses Percy, D. H. Williams, K. L. Paturzo, F. X. Arch Virol Original Papers Sialodacryoadenitis virus (SDAV) and Parker's rat coronavirus (PRC) are two recognized viral strains which cause spontaneous disease in the laboratory rat. Currently there is no recognized practical procedure which will accurately differentiate infections with these strains. Using SDAV- and PRC-infected L-2 cells as the source of antigen, and sera from rats collected post inoculation with either of these viral strains, the indirect fluorescent antibody (IFA) procedure was used to determine whether antibody titers could be used to differentiate infections from the homologous and heterologous virus. There was no detectable difference in the sensitivity or specificity of these systems in detecting antibody to the homologous or heterologous virus. Thus there was no evidence that SDAV- and PRC-infected cells would serve to differentiate antibody to the homologous virus using the IFA technique. In addition, antibody titers were similar when mouse hepatitis virus (MHV)-infected cells were used as the source of antigen for the IFA technique. However, using MHV or SDAV-infected cells as the source of antigen, there was a significant difference in antibody titers to the homologous virus detected using the immunoenzyme technique. Springer-Verlag 1991 /pmc/articles/PMC7087136/ /pubmed/1877886 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01310668 Text en © Springer-Verlag 1991 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Original Papers
Percy, D. H.
Williams, K. L.
Paturzo, F. X.
A comparison of the sensitivity and specificity of sialodacryoadenitis virus, Parker's rat coronavirus, and mouse hepatitis virus-infected cells as a source of antigen for the detection of antibody to rat coronaviruses
title A comparison of the sensitivity and specificity of sialodacryoadenitis virus, Parker's rat coronavirus, and mouse hepatitis virus-infected cells as a source of antigen for the detection of antibody to rat coronaviruses
title_full A comparison of the sensitivity and specificity of sialodacryoadenitis virus, Parker's rat coronavirus, and mouse hepatitis virus-infected cells as a source of antigen for the detection of antibody to rat coronaviruses
title_fullStr A comparison of the sensitivity and specificity of sialodacryoadenitis virus, Parker's rat coronavirus, and mouse hepatitis virus-infected cells as a source of antigen for the detection of antibody to rat coronaviruses
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of the sensitivity and specificity of sialodacryoadenitis virus, Parker's rat coronavirus, and mouse hepatitis virus-infected cells as a source of antigen for the detection of antibody to rat coronaviruses
title_short A comparison of the sensitivity and specificity of sialodacryoadenitis virus, Parker's rat coronavirus, and mouse hepatitis virus-infected cells as a source of antigen for the detection of antibody to rat coronaviruses
title_sort comparison of the sensitivity and specificity of sialodacryoadenitis virus, parker's rat coronavirus, and mouse hepatitis virus-infected cells as a source of antigen for the detection of antibody to rat coronaviruses
topic Original Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7087136/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1877886
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01310668
work_keys_str_mv AT percydh acomparisonofthesensitivityandspecificityofsialodacryoadenitisvirusparkersratcoronavirusandmousehepatitisvirusinfectedcellsasasourceofantigenforthedetectionofantibodytoratcoronaviruses
AT williamskl acomparisonofthesensitivityandspecificityofsialodacryoadenitisvirusparkersratcoronavirusandmousehepatitisvirusinfectedcellsasasourceofantigenforthedetectionofantibodytoratcoronaviruses
AT paturzofx acomparisonofthesensitivityandspecificityofsialodacryoadenitisvirusparkersratcoronavirusandmousehepatitisvirusinfectedcellsasasourceofantigenforthedetectionofantibodytoratcoronaviruses
AT percydh comparisonofthesensitivityandspecificityofsialodacryoadenitisvirusparkersratcoronavirusandmousehepatitisvirusinfectedcellsasasourceofantigenforthedetectionofantibodytoratcoronaviruses
AT williamskl comparisonofthesensitivityandspecificityofsialodacryoadenitisvirusparkersratcoronavirusandmousehepatitisvirusinfectedcellsasasourceofantigenforthedetectionofantibodytoratcoronaviruses
AT paturzofx comparisonofthesensitivityandspecificityofsialodacryoadenitisvirusparkersratcoronavirusandmousehepatitisvirusinfectedcellsasasourceofantigenforthedetectionofantibodytoratcoronaviruses