Cargando…
A comparison of the sensitivity and specificity of sialodacryoadenitis virus, Parker's rat coronavirus, and mouse hepatitis virus-infected cells as a source of antigen for the detection of antibody to rat coronaviruses
Sialodacryoadenitis virus (SDAV) and Parker's rat coronavirus (PRC) are two recognized viral strains which cause spontaneous disease in the laboratory rat. Currently there is no recognized practical procedure which will accurately differentiate infections with these strains. Using SDAV- and PRC...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer-Verlag
1991
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7087136/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1877886 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01310668 |
_version_ | 1783509274725449728 |
---|---|
author | Percy, D. H. Williams, K. L. Paturzo, F. X. |
author_facet | Percy, D. H. Williams, K. L. Paturzo, F. X. |
author_sort | Percy, D. H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Sialodacryoadenitis virus (SDAV) and Parker's rat coronavirus (PRC) are two recognized viral strains which cause spontaneous disease in the laboratory rat. Currently there is no recognized practical procedure which will accurately differentiate infections with these strains. Using SDAV- and PRC-infected L-2 cells as the source of antigen, and sera from rats collected post inoculation with either of these viral strains, the indirect fluorescent antibody (IFA) procedure was used to determine whether antibody titers could be used to differentiate infections from the homologous and heterologous virus. There was no detectable difference in the sensitivity or specificity of these systems in detecting antibody to the homologous or heterologous virus. Thus there was no evidence that SDAV- and PRC-infected cells would serve to differentiate antibody to the homologous virus using the IFA technique. In addition, antibody titers were similar when mouse hepatitis virus (MHV)-infected cells were used as the source of antigen for the IFA technique. However, using MHV or SDAV-infected cells as the source of antigen, there was a significant difference in antibody titers to the homologous virus detected using the immunoenzyme technique. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7087136 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 1991 |
publisher | Springer-Verlag |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70871362020-03-23 A comparison of the sensitivity and specificity of sialodacryoadenitis virus, Parker's rat coronavirus, and mouse hepatitis virus-infected cells as a source of antigen for the detection of antibody to rat coronaviruses Percy, D. H. Williams, K. L. Paturzo, F. X. Arch Virol Original Papers Sialodacryoadenitis virus (SDAV) and Parker's rat coronavirus (PRC) are two recognized viral strains which cause spontaneous disease in the laboratory rat. Currently there is no recognized practical procedure which will accurately differentiate infections with these strains. Using SDAV- and PRC-infected L-2 cells as the source of antigen, and sera from rats collected post inoculation with either of these viral strains, the indirect fluorescent antibody (IFA) procedure was used to determine whether antibody titers could be used to differentiate infections from the homologous and heterologous virus. There was no detectable difference in the sensitivity or specificity of these systems in detecting antibody to the homologous or heterologous virus. Thus there was no evidence that SDAV- and PRC-infected cells would serve to differentiate antibody to the homologous virus using the IFA technique. In addition, antibody titers were similar when mouse hepatitis virus (MHV)-infected cells were used as the source of antigen for the IFA technique. However, using MHV or SDAV-infected cells as the source of antigen, there was a significant difference in antibody titers to the homologous virus detected using the immunoenzyme technique. Springer-Verlag 1991 /pmc/articles/PMC7087136/ /pubmed/1877886 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01310668 Text en © Springer-Verlag 1991 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Original Papers Percy, D. H. Williams, K. L. Paturzo, F. X. A comparison of the sensitivity and specificity of sialodacryoadenitis virus, Parker's rat coronavirus, and mouse hepatitis virus-infected cells as a source of antigen for the detection of antibody to rat coronaviruses |
title | A comparison of the sensitivity and specificity of sialodacryoadenitis virus, Parker's rat coronavirus, and mouse hepatitis virus-infected cells as a source of antigen for the detection of antibody to rat coronaviruses |
title_full | A comparison of the sensitivity and specificity of sialodacryoadenitis virus, Parker's rat coronavirus, and mouse hepatitis virus-infected cells as a source of antigen for the detection of antibody to rat coronaviruses |
title_fullStr | A comparison of the sensitivity and specificity of sialodacryoadenitis virus, Parker's rat coronavirus, and mouse hepatitis virus-infected cells as a source of antigen for the detection of antibody to rat coronaviruses |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparison of the sensitivity and specificity of sialodacryoadenitis virus, Parker's rat coronavirus, and mouse hepatitis virus-infected cells as a source of antigen for the detection of antibody to rat coronaviruses |
title_short | A comparison of the sensitivity and specificity of sialodacryoadenitis virus, Parker's rat coronavirus, and mouse hepatitis virus-infected cells as a source of antigen for the detection of antibody to rat coronaviruses |
title_sort | comparison of the sensitivity and specificity of sialodacryoadenitis virus, parker's rat coronavirus, and mouse hepatitis virus-infected cells as a source of antigen for the detection of antibody to rat coronaviruses |
topic | Original Papers |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7087136/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1877886 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01310668 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT percydh acomparisonofthesensitivityandspecificityofsialodacryoadenitisvirusparkersratcoronavirusandmousehepatitisvirusinfectedcellsasasourceofantigenforthedetectionofantibodytoratcoronaviruses AT williamskl acomparisonofthesensitivityandspecificityofsialodacryoadenitisvirusparkersratcoronavirusandmousehepatitisvirusinfectedcellsasasourceofantigenforthedetectionofantibodytoratcoronaviruses AT paturzofx acomparisonofthesensitivityandspecificityofsialodacryoadenitisvirusparkersratcoronavirusandmousehepatitisvirusinfectedcellsasasourceofantigenforthedetectionofantibodytoratcoronaviruses AT percydh comparisonofthesensitivityandspecificityofsialodacryoadenitisvirusparkersratcoronavirusandmousehepatitisvirusinfectedcellsasasourceofantigenforthedetectionofantibodytoratcoronaviruses AT williamskl comparisonofthesensitivityandspecificityofsialodacryoadenitisvirusparkersratcoronavirusandmousehepatitisvirusinfectedcellsasasourceofantigenforthedetectionofantibodytoratcoronaviruses AT paturzofx comparisonofthesensitivityandspecificityofsialodacryoadenitisvirusparkersratcoronavirusandmousehepatitisvirusinfectedcellsasasourceofantigenforthedetectionofantibodytoratcoronaviruses |