Cargando…

Impact of socioeconomic status on end-of-life costs: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Socioeconomic inequalities in access to, and utilization of medical care have been shown in many jurisdictions. However, the extent to which they exist at end-of-life (EOL) remains unclear. METHODS: Studies in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, ProQuest, Web of Science, Web of Knowledge, and OpenG...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yu, Caberry W., Alavinia, S. Mohammad, Alter, David A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7087362/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32293403
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-020-0538-y
_version_ 1783509323422367744
author Yu, Caberry W.
Alavinia, S. Mohammad
Alter, David A.
author_facet Yu, Caberry W.
Alavinia, S. Mohammad
Alter, David A.
author_sort Yu, Caberry W.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Socioeconomic inequalities in access to, and utilization of medical care have been shown in many jurisdictions. However, the extent to which they exist at end-of-life (EOL) remains unclear. METHODS: Studies in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, ProQuest, Web of Science, Web of Knowledge, and OpenGrey databases were searched through December 2019 with hand-searching of in-text citations. No publication date or language limitations were set. Studies assessing SES (e.g. income) in adults, correlated to EOL costs in last year(s) or month(s) of life were selected. Two independent reviewers performed data abstraction and quality assessment, with inconsistencies resolved by consensus. RESULTS: A total of twenty articles met eligibility criteria. Two meta-analyses were performed on studies that examined total costs in last year of life – the first examined costs without adjustments for confounders (n = 4), the second examined costs that adjusted for confounders, including comorbidities (n = 2). Among studies which did not adjust for comorbidities, SES was positively correlated with EOL costs (standardized mean difference, 0.13 [95% confidence interval, 0.03 to 0.24]). However, among studies adjusting for comorbidities, SES was inversely correlated with EOL expenditures (regression coefficient, −$150.94 [95% confidence interval, −$177.69 to -$124.19], 2015 United States Dollars (USD)). Higher ambulatory care and drug expenditure were consistently found among higher SES patients irrespective of whether or not comorbidity adjustment was employed. CONCLUSION: Overall, an inequality leading to higher end-of-life expenditure for higher SES patients existed to varying extents, even within countries providing universal health care, with greatest differences seen for outpatient and prescription drug costs. The magnitude and directionality of the relationship in part depended on whether comorbidity risk-adjustment methodology was employed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7087362
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70873622020-03-24 Impact of socioeconomic status on end-of-life costs: a systematic review and meta-analysis Yu, Caberry W. Alavinia, S. Mohammad Alter, David A. BMC Palliat Care Research Article BACKGROUND: Socioeconomic inequalities in access to, and utilization of medical care have been shown in many jurisdictions. However, the extent to which they exist at end-of-life (EOL) remains unclear. METHODS: Studies in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, ProQuest, Web of Science, Web of Knowledge, and OpenGrey databases were searched through December 2019 with hand-searching of in-text citations. No publication date or language limitations were set. Studies assessing SES (e.g. income) in adults, correlated to EOL costs in last year(s) or month(s) of life were selected. Two independent reviewers performed data abstraction and quality assessment, with inconsistencies resolved by consensus. RESULTS: A total of twenty articles met eligibility criteria. Two meta-analyses were performed on studies that examined total costs in last year of life – the first examined costs without adjustments for confounders (n = 4), the second examined costs that adjusted for confounders, including comorbidities (n = 2). Among studies which did not adjust for comorbidities, SES was positively correlated with EOL costs (standardized mean difference, 0.13 [95% confidence interval, 0.03 to 0.24]). However, among studies adjusting for comorbidities, SES was inversely correlated with EOL expenditures (regression coefficient, −$150.94 [95% confidence interval, −$177.69 to -$124.19], 2015 United States Dollars (USD)). Higher ambulatory care and drug expenditure were consistently found among higher SES patients irrespective of whether or not comorbidity adjustment was employed. CONCLUSION: Overall, an inequality leading to higher end-of-life expenditure for higher SES patients existed to varying extents, even within countries providing universal health care, with greatest differences seen for outpatient and prescription drug costs. The magnitude and directionality of the relationship in part depended on whether comorbidity risk-adjustment methodology was employed. BioMed Central 2020-03-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7087362/ /pubmed/32293403 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-020-0538-y Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Yu, Caberry W.
Alavinia, S. Mohammad
Alter, David A.
Impact of socioeconomic status on end-of-life costs: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Impact of socioeconomic status on end-of-life costs: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Impact of socioeconomic status on end-of-life costs: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Impact of socioeconomic status on end-of-life costs: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Impact of socioeconomic status on end-of-life costs: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Impact of socioeconomic status on end-of-life costs: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort impact of socioeconomic status on end-of-life costs: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7087362/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32293403
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-020-0538-y
work_keys_str_mv AT yucaberryw impactofsocioeconomicstatusonendoflifecostsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT alaviniasmohammad impactofsocioeconomicstatusonendoflifecostsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT alterdavida impactofsocioeconomicstatusonendoflifecostsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis