Cargando…

Electrochemotherapy in Treatment of Canine Oral Malignant Melanoma and Factors Influencing Treatment Outcome

BACKGROUND: Oral malignant melanoma is the most common, but aggressive oral cancer in dogs with poor prognosis. Electrochemotherapy (ECT) has therapeutic potential in such tumors as effective local treatment. Therefore, the aim of this prospective clinical study was to evaluate treatment effectivene...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tellado, Matías Nicolás, Maglietti, Felipe Horacio, Michinski, Sebastián Diego, Marshall, Guillermo Ricardo, Signori, Emanuela
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sciendo 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7087426/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32187017
http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/raon-2020-0014
_version_ 1783509333918613504
author Tellado, Matías Nicolás
Maglietti, Felipe Horacio
Michinski, Sebastián Diego
Marshall, Guillermo Ricardo
Signori, Emanuela
author_facet Tellado, Matías Nicolás
Maglietti, Felipe Horacio
Michinski, Sebastián Diego
Marshall, Guillermo Ricardo
Signori, Emanuela
author_sort Tellado, Matías Nicolás
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Oral malignant melanoma is the most common, but aggressive oral cancer in dogs with poor prognosis. Electrochemotherapy (ECT) has therapeutic potential in such tumors as effective local treatment. Therefore, the aim of this prospective clinical study was to evaluate treatment effectiveness of ECT in as first line treatment for canine oral malignant melanoma, and search for factors influencing treatment outcome. METHODS: Sixty-seven canines with primary oral malignant melanoma, non-candidates for first-line therapy, were enrolled. All dogs received ECT and follow-up exams for the span of two years. RESULTS: Based on RECIST criteria, the objective response rate was 100%, 89.5%, 57.7%, and 36.4%, in stage I, II, III and IV, respectively. Only patients in stage I, II and III with partial or complete response improved their quality of life. The median time to progression was 11, 7, 4 and 4 months, and median survival time after the treatment was 16.5, 9.0, 7.5 and 4.5 months, for patients in stage I, II, III and IV, respectively. Significantly better was local response in stage I and II disease (p = 0.0013), without the bone involvement (p = 0.043) CONCLUSIONS: Electrochemotherapy is effective local treatment of oral canine malignant melanoma when no alternative treatment is available. Better response is expected in stage I and II patients with tumors without bone involvement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7087426
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Sciendo
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70874262020-03-26 Electrochemotherapy in Treatment of Canine Oral Malignant Melanoma and Factors Influencing Treatment Outcome Tellado, Matías Nicolás Maglietti, Felipe Horacio Michinski, Sebastián Diego Marshall, Guillermo Ricardo Signori, Emanuela Radiol Oncol Research Article BACKGROUND: Oral malignant melanoma is the most common, but aggressive oral cancer in dogs with poor prognosis. Electrochemotherapy (ECT) has therapeutic potential in such tumors as effective local treatment. Therefore, the aim of this prospective clinical study was to evaluate treatment effectiveness of ECT in as first line treatment for canine oral malignant melanoma, and search for factors influencing treatment outcome. METHODS: Sixty-seven canines with primary oral malignant melanoma, non-candidates for first-line therapy, were enrolled. All dogs received ECT and follow-up exams for the span of two years. RESULTS: Based on RECIST criteria, the objective response rate was 100%, 89.5%, 57.7%, and 36.4%, in stage I, II, III and IV, respectively. Only patients in stage I, II and III with partial or complete response improved their quality of life. The median time to progression was 11, 7, 4 and 4 months, and median survival time after the treatment was 16.5, 9.0, 7.5 and 4.5 months, for patients in stage I, II, III and IV, respectively. Significantly better was local response in stage I and II disease (p = 0.0013), without the bone involvement (p = 0.043) CONCLUSIONS: Electrochemotherapy is effective local treatment of oral canine malignant melanoma when no alternative treatment is available. Better response is expected in stage I and II patients with tumors without bone involvement. Sciendo 2020-03-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7087426/ /pubmed/32187017 http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/raon-2020-0014 Text en © 2020 Matías Nicolás Tellado, Felipe Horacio Maglietti, Sebastián Diego Michinski, Guillermo Ricardo Marshall, Emanuela Signori, published by Sciendo http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
spellingShingle Research Article
Tellado, Matías Nicolás
Maglietti, Felipe Horacio
Michinski, Sebastián Diego
Marshall, Guillermo Ricardo
Signori, Emanuela
Electrochemotherapy in Treatment of Canine Oral Malignant Melanoma and Factors Influencing Treatment Outcome
title Electrochemotherapy in Treatment of Canine Oral Malignant Melanoma and Factors Influencing Treatment Outcome
title_full Electrochemotherapy in Treatment of Canine Oral Malignant Melanoma and Factors Influencing Treatment Outcome
title_fullStr Electrochemotherapy in Treatment of Canine Oral Malignant Melanoma and Factors Influencing Treatment Outcome
title_full_unstemmed Electrochemotherapy in Treatment of Canine Oral Malignant Melanoma and Factors Influencing Treatment Outcome
title_short Electrochemotherapy in Treatment of Canine Oral Malignant Melanoma and Factors Influencing Treatment Outcome
title_sort electrochemotherapy in treatment of canine oral malignant melanoma and factors influencing treatment outcome
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7087426/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32187017
http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/raon-2020-0014
work_keys_str_mv AT telladomatiasnicolas electrochemotherapyintreatmentofcanineoralmalignantmelanomaandfactorsinfluencingtreatmentoutcome
AT magliettifelipehoracio electrochemotherapyintreatmentofcanineoralmalignantmelanomaandfactorsinfluencingtreatmentoutcome
AT michinskisebastiandiego electrochemotherapyintreatmentofcanineoralmalignantmelanomaandfactorsinfluencingtreatmentoutcome
AT marshallguillermoricardo electrochemotherapyintreatmentofcanineoralmalignantmelanomaandfactorsinfluencingtreatmentoutcome
AT signoriemanuela electrochemotherapyintreatmentofcanineoralmalignantmelanomaandfactorsinfluencingtreatmentoutcome