Cargando…

Assessment the protection performance of different level personal respiratory protection masks against viral aerosol

New viral disease such as SARS and H1N1 highlighted the vulnerability of healthcare workers to aerosol-transmitted viral infections. This paper was to assess the protection performance of different level personal respiratory protection equipments against viral aerosol. Surgical masks, N95 masks and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wen, ZhanBo, Yu, Long, Yang, WenHui, Hu, LingFei, Li, Na, Wang, Jie, Li, JinSong, Lu, JianChun, Dong, XiaoKai, Yin, Zhe, Zhang, Ke
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7087618/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32214627
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10453-012-9286-7
_version_ 1783509367766646784
author Wen, ZhanBo
Yu, Long
Yang, WenHui
Hu, LingFei
Li, Na
Wang, Jie
Li, JinSong
Lu, JianChun
Dong, XiaoKai
Yin, Zhe
Zhang, Ke
author_facet Wen, ZhanBo
Yu, Long
Yang, WenHui
Hu, LingFei
Li, Na
Wang, Jie
Li, JinSong
Lu, JianChun
Dong, XiaoKai
Yin, Zhe
Zhang, Ke
author_sort Wen, ZhanBo
collection PubMed
description New viral disease such as SARS and H1N1 highlighted the vulnerability of healthcare workers to aerosol-transmitted viral infections. This paper was to assess the protection performance of different level personal respiratory protection equipments against viral aerosol. Surgical masks, N95 masks and N99 masks were purchased from the market. The masks were sealed onto the manikin in the aerosol testing chamber. Viral aerosol was generated and then sampled simultaneously before and after the tested mask using biosamplers. This allows a percentage efficiency value to be calculated against test phage SM702 aerosols which surrogates of viral pathogens aerosol. At the same time, the masks face fit factor was determined by TSI8020. The viral aerosol particles aerodynamic diameter was 0.744 μm, and GSD was 1.29. The protection performance of the material of all the tested masks against viral aerosol was all >95 %. All the five surgical masks face fit factor were <8. F model N95 mask and H model N99 mask face fit factor were all >160. G model N95 mask face fit factor was 8.2. The protection performances of N95 or N99 masks were many times higher than surgical mask when considering the face fit factor. Surgical masks cannot offer sufficient protection against the inhalation of viral aerosol because they cannot provide a close face seal.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7087618
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70876182020-03-23 Assessment the protection performance of different level personal respiratory protection masks against viral aerosol Wen, ZhanBo Yu, Long Yang, WenHui Hu, LingFei Li, Na Wang, Jie Li, JinSong Lu, JianChun Dong, XiaoKai Yin, Zhe Zhang, Ke Aerobiologia (Bologna) Original Paper New viral disease such as SARS and H1N1 highlighted the vulnerability of healthcare workers to aerosol-transmitted viral infections. This paper was to assess the protection performance of different level personal respiratory protection equipments against viral aerosol. Surgical masks, N95 masks and N99 masks were purchased from the market. The masks were sealed onto the manikin in the aerosol testing chamber. Viral aerosol was generated and then sampled simultaneously before and after the tested mask using biosamplers. This allows a percentage efficiency value to be calculated against test phage SM702 aerosols which surrogates of viral pathogens aerosol. At the same time, the masks face fit factor was determined by TSI8020. The viral aerosol particles aerodynamic diameter was 0.744 μm, and GSD was 1.29. The protection performance of the material of all the tested masks against viral aerosol was all >95 %. All the five surgical masks face fit factor were <8. F model N95 mask and H model N99 mask face fit factor were all >160. G model N95 mask face fit factor was 8.2. The protection performances of N95 or N99 masks were many times higher than surgical mask when considering the face fit factor. Surgical masks cannot offer sufficient protection against the inhalation of viral aerosol because they cannot provide a close face seal. Springer Netherlands 2012-12-23 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC7087618/ /pubmed/32214627 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10453-012-9286-7 Text en © Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Wen, ZhanBo
Yu, Long
Yang, WenHui
Hu, LingFei
Li, Na
Wang, Jie
Li, JinSong
Lu, JianChun
Dong, XiaoKai
Yin, Zhe
Zhang, Ke
Assessment the protection performance of different level personal respiratory protection masks against viral aerosol
title Assessment the protection performance of different level personal respiratory protection masks against viral aerosol
title_full Assessment the protection performance of different level personal respiratory protection masks against viral aerosol
title_fullStr Assessment the protection performance of different level personal respiratory protection masks against viral aerosol
title_full_unstemmed Assessment the protection performance of different level personal respiratory protection masks against viral aerosol
title_short Assessment the protection performance of different level personal respiratory protection masks against viral aerosol
title_sort assessment the protection performance of different level personal respiratory protection masks against viral aerosol
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7087618/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32214627
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10453-012-9286-7
work_keys_str_mv AT wenzhanbo assessmenttheprotectionperformanceofdifferentlevelpersonalrespiratoryprotectionmasksagainstviralaerosol
AT yulong assessmenttheprotectionperformanceofdifferentlevelpersonalrespiratoryprotectionmasksagainstviralaerosol
AT yangwenhui assessmenttheprotectionperformanceofdifferentlevelpersonalrespiratoryprotectionmasksagainstviralaerosol
AT hulingfei assessmenttheprotectionperformanceofdifferentlevelpersonalrespiratoryprotectionmasksagainstviralaerosol
AT lina assessmenttheprotectionperformanceofdifferentlevelpersonalrespiratoryprotectionmasksagainstviralaerosol
AT wangjie assessmenttheprotectionperformanceofdifferentlevelpersonalrespiratoryprotectionmasksagainstviralaerosol
AT lijinsong assessmenttheprotectionperformanceofdifferentlevelpersonalrespiratoryprotectionmasksagainstviralaerosol
AT lujianchun assessmenttheprotectionperformanceofdifferentlevelpersonalrespiratoryprotectionmasksagainstviralaerosol
AT dongxiaokai assessmenttheprotectionperformanceofdifferentlevelpersonalrespiratoryprotectionmasksagainstviralaerosol
AT yinzhe assessmenttheprotectionperformanceofdifferentlevelpersonalrespiratoryprotectionmasksagainstviralaerosol
AT zhangke assessmenttheprotectionperformanceofdifferentlevelpersonalrespiratoryprotectionmasksagainstviralaerosol