Cargando…

Effects of humidity and other factors on the generation and sampling of a coronavirus aerosol

Suspensions of transmissible gastroenteritis virus (TGEV), a porcine coronavirus, were nebulized at rates of 0.1–0.2 ml/min into moving air using a Collison nebulizer or a plastic medical nebulizer operating at pressures ranging from 7 to 15 psi. The airborne viruses were collected on heating, venti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Seung Won, Ramakrishnan, M. A., Raynor, Peter C., Goyal, Sagar M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7087841/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32214623
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10453-007-9068-9
_version_ 1783509416061960192
author Kim, Seung Won
Ramakrishnan, M. A.
Raynor, Peter C.
Goyal, Sagar M.
author_facet Kim, Seung Won
Ramakrishnan, M. A.
Raynor, Peter C.
Goyal, Sagar M.
author_sort Kim, Seung Won
collection PubMed
description Suspensions of transmissible gastroenteritis virus (TGEV), a porcine coronavirus, were nebulized at rates of 0.1–0.2 ml/min into moving air using a Collison nebulizer or a plastic medical nebulizer operating at pressures ranging from 7 to 15 psi. The airborne viruses were collected on heating, ventilating, and air conditioning (HVAC) filters in an experimental apparatus and also sampled upstream of these test filters using AGI-30 and BioSampler impinger samplers. To study the effects of relative humidity (RH) on TGEV collection by the filters and samplers, the virus was nebulized into air at 30, 50, 70, and 90% RH. There were no significant changes in virus titer in the nebulizer suspension before and after nebulization for either nebulizer at any of the pressures utilized. Aerosolization efficiency – the ratio of viable virus sampled with impingers to the quantity of viable virus nebulized – decreased with increasing humidity. BioSamplers detected more airborne virus than AGI-30 samplers at all RH levels. This difference was statistically significant at 30 and 50% RH. Nebulizer type and pressure did not significantly affect the viability of the airborne virus. Virus recovery from test filters relative to the concentration of virus in the nebulizer suspension was less than 10%. The most and the least virus were recovered from filter media at 30% and 90% RH, respectively. The results suggest that TGEV, and perhaps other coronaviruses, remain viable longer in an airborne state and are sampled more effectively at low RH than at high humidity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7087841
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70878412020-03-23 Effects of humidity and other factors on the generation and sampling of a coronavirus aerosol Kim, Seung Won Ramakrishnan, M. A. Raynor, Peter C. Goyal, Sagar M. Aerobiologia (Bologna) Original Paper Suspensions of transmissible gastroenteritis virus (TGEV), a porcine coronavirus, were nebulized at rates of 0.1–0.2 ml/min into moving air using a Collison nebulizer or a plastic medical nebulizer operating at pressures ranging from 7 to 15 psi. The airborne viruses were collected on heating, ventilating, and air conditioning (HVAC) filters in an experimental apparatus and also sampled upstream of these test filters using AGI-30 and BioSampler impinger samplers. To study the effects of relative humidity (RH) on TGEV collection by the filters and samplers, the virus was nebulized into air at 30, 50, 70, and 90% RH. There were no significant changes in virus titer in the nebulizer suspension before and after nebulization for either nebulizer at any of the pressures utilized. Aerosolization efficiency – the ratio of viable virus sampled with impingers to the quantity of viable virus nebulized – decreased with increasing humidity. BioSamplers detected more airborne virus than AGI-30 samplers at all RH levels. This difference was statistically significant at 30 and 50% RH. Nebulizer type and pressure did not significantly affect the viability of the airborne virus. Virus recovery from test filters relative to the concentration of virus in the nebulizer suspension was less than 10%. The most and the least virus were recovered from filter media at 30% and 90% RH, respectively. The results suggest that TGEV, and perhaps other coronaviruses, remain viable longer in an airborne state and are sampled more effectively at low RH than at high humidity. Springer Netherlands 2007-07-25 2007 /pmc/articles/PMC7087841/ /pubmed/32214623 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10453-007-9068-9 Text en © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Kim, Seung Won
Ramakrishnan, M. A.
Raynor, Peter C.
Goyal, Sagar M.
Effects of humidity and other factors on the generation and sampling of a coronavirus aerosol
title Effects of humidity and other factors on the generation and sampling of a coronavirus aerosol
title_full Effects of humidity and other factors on the generation and sampling of a coronavirus aerosol
title_fullStr Effects of humidity and other factors on the generation and sampling of a coronavirus aerosol
title_full_unstemmed Effects of humidity and other factors on the generation and sampling of a coronavirus aerosol
title_short Effects of humidity and other factors on the generation and sampling of a coronavirus aerosol
title_sort effects of humidity and other factors on the generation and sampling of a coronavirus aerosol
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7087841/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32214623
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10453-007-9068-9
work_keys_str_mv AT kimseungwon effectsofhumidityandotherfactorsonthegenerationandsamplingofacoronavirusaerosol
AT ramakrishnanma effectsofhumidityandotherfactorsonthegenerationandsamplingofacoronavirusaerosol
AT raynorpeterc effectsofhumidityandotherfactorsonthegenerationandsamplingofacoronavirusaerosol
AT goyalsagarm effectsofhumidityandotherfactorsonthegenerationandsamplingofacoronavirusaerosol