Cargando…
Retrospective serological survey on selected viral pathogens in wild boar populations in Germany
The objective of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the occurrence of porcine parvovirus (PPV), Aujeszky’s disease virus (ADV), transmissible gastroenteritis virus (TGEV), porcine respiratory coronavirus (PRCV), porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) and swine influenza...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer-Verlag
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7088096/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32214937 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10344-008-0229-0 |
_version_ | 1783509471255855104 |
---|---|
author | Kaden, V. Lange, E. Hänel, A. Hlinak, A. Mewes, L. Hergarten, G. Irsch, B. Dedek, J. Bruer, W. |
author_facet | Kaden, V. Lange, E. Hänel, A. Hlinak, A. Mewes, L. Hergarten, G. Irsch, B. Dedek, J. Bruer, W. |
author_sort | Kaden, V. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The objective of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the occurrence of porcine parvovirus (PPV), Aujeszky’s disease virus (ADV), transmissible gastroenteritis virus (TGEV), porcine respiratory coronavirus (PRCV), porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) and swine influenza virus (SIV) in selected wild boar populations in Germany (n = 1,221). Commercial enzyme linked immunosorbent assay and hemagglutination inhibition tests were used for serological monitoring. The serosurvey revealed seroprevalence rates of 64.28%, 11.26%, 7.87%, 7.84%, 3.82% and 1.59% for PPV, ADV, PRCV, SIV, PRRSV and TGEV, respectively. The seroprevalence rates differed between populations and age classes with the highest number of antibody-positive wild boars in older animals (>1 year old). No antibodies to TGEV were found in Baden–Wuerttemberg and in Mecklenburg–Western Pomerania (investigation period 1997/1998). In addition, sera collected in Mecklenburg–Western Pomerania in 1997/1998 were negative for SIV. Even though the seroprevalence rates established for these viruses, except for PPV, were relatively low, wild boars may act as a reservoir for pathogens and a source of infection for domestic pigs and humans. Based on the epidemiological situation, no risk of a spread of these viruses should emanate from wild boars, neither for wildlife nor for livestock. However, effective and science-based disease monitoring programmes should continuously be carried out in wild boar populations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7088096 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | Springer-Verlag |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70880962020-03-23 Retrospective serological survey on selected viral pathogens in wild boar populations in Germany Kaden, V. Lange, E. Hänel, A. Hlinak, A. Mewes, L. Hergarten, G. Irsch, B. Dedek, J. Bruer, W. Eur. J. Wildl. Res Original Paper The objective of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the occurrence of porcine parvovirus (PPV), Aujeszky’s disease virus (ADV), transmissible gastroenteritis virus (TGEV), porcine respiratory coronavirus (PRCV), porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) and swine influenza virus (SIV) in selected wild boar populations in Germany (n = 1,221). Commercial enzyme linked immunosorbent assay and hemagglutination inhibition tests were used for serological monitoring. The serosurvey revealed seroprevalence rates of 64.28%, 11.26%, 7.87%, 7.84%, 3.82% and 1.59% for PPV, ADV, PRCV, SIV, PRRSV and TGEV, respectively. The seroprevalence rates differed between populations and age classes with the highest number of antibody-positive wild boars in older animals (>1 year old). No antibodies to TGEV were found in Baden–Wuerttemberg and in Mecklenburg–Western Pomerania (investigation period 1997/1998). In addition, sera collected in Mecklenburg–Western Pomerania in 1997/1998 were negative for SIV. Even though the seroprevalence rates established for these viruses, except for PPV, were relatively low, wild boars may act as a reservoir for pathogens and a source of infection for domestic pigs and humans. Based on the epidemiological situation, no risk of a spread of these viruses should emanate from wild boars, neither for wildlife nor for livestock. However, effective and science-based disease monitoring programmes should continuously be carried out in wild boar populations. Springer-Verlag 2008-10-17 2009 /pmc/articles/PMC7088096/ /pubmed/32214937 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10344-008-0229-0 Text en © Springer-Verlag 2008 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Kaden, V. Lange, E. Hänel, A. Hlinak, A. Mewes, L. Hergarten, G. Irsch, B. Dedek, J. Bruer, W. Retrospective serological survey on selected viral pathogens in wild boar populations in Germany |
title | Retrospective serological survey on selected viral pathogens in wild boar populations in Germany |
title_full | Retrospective serological survey on selected viral pathogens in wild boar populations in Germany |
title_fullStr | Retrospective serological survey on selected viral pathogens in wild boar populations in Germany |
title_full_unstemmed | Retrospective serological survey on selected viral pathogens in wild boar populations in Germany |
title_short | Retrospective serological survey on selected viral pathogens in wild boar populations in Germany |
title_sort | retrospective serological survey on selected viral pathogens in wild boar populations in germany |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7088096/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32214937 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10344-008-0229-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kadenv retrospectiveserologicalsurveyonselectedviralpathogensinwildboarpopulationsingermany AT langee retrospectiveserologicalsurveyonselectedviralpathogensinwildboarpopulationsingermany AT hanela retrospectiveserologicalsurveyonselectedviralpathogensinwildboarpopulationsingermany AT hlinaka retrospectiveserologicalsurveyonselectedviralpathogensinwildboarpopulationsingermany AT mewesl retrospectiveserologicalsurveyonselectedviralpathogensinwildboarpopulationsingermany AT hergarteng retrospectiveserologicalsurveyonselectedviralpathogensinwildboarpopulationsingermany AT irschb retrospectiveserologicalsurveyonselectedviralpathogensinwildboarpopulationsingermany AT dedekj retrospectiveserologicalsurveyonselectedviralpathogensinwildboarpopulationsingermany AT bruerw retrospectiveserologicalsurveyonselectedviralpathogensinwildboarpopulationsingermany |