Cargando…

Retrospective serological survey on selected viral pathogens in wild boar populations in Germany

The objective of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the occurrence of porcine parvovirus (PPV), Aujeszky’s disease virus (ADV), transmissible gastroenteritis virus (TGEV), porcine respiratory coronavirus (PRCV), porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) and swine influenza...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kaden, V., Lange, E., Hänel, A., Hlinak, A., Mewes, L., Hergarten, G., Irsch, B., Dedek, J., Bruer, W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7088096/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32214937
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10344-008-0229-0
_version_ 1783509471255855104
author Kaden, V.
Lange, E.
Hänel, A.
Hlinak, A.
Mewes, L.
Hergarten, G.
Irsch, B.
Dedek, J.
Bruer, W.
author_facet Kaden, V.
Lange, E.
Hänel, A.
Hlinak, A.
Mewes, L.
Hergarten, G.
Irsch, B.
Dedek, J.
Bruer, W.
author_sort Kaden, V.
collection PubMed
description The objective of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the occurrence of porcine parvovirus (PPV), Aujeszky’s disease virus (ADV), transmissible gastroenteritis virus (TGEV), porcine respiratory coronavirus (PRCV), porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) and swine influenza virus (SIV) in selected wild boar populations in Germany (n  = 1,221). Commercial enzyme linked immunosorbent assay and hemagglutination inhibition tests were used for serological monitoring. The serosurvey revealed seroprevalence rates of 64.28%, 11.26%, 7.87%, 7.84%, 3.82% and 1.59% for PPV, ADV, PRCV, SIV, PRRSV and TGEV, respectively. The seroprevalence rates differed between populations and age classes with the highest number of antibody-positive wild boars in older animals (>1 year old). No antibodies to TGEV were found in Baden–Wuerttemberg and in Mecklenburg–Western Pomerania (investigation period 1997/1998). In addition, sera collected in Mecklenburg–Western Pomerania in 1997/1998 were negative for SIV. Even though the seroprevalence rates established for these viruses, except for PPV, were relatively low, wild boars may act as a reservoir for pathogens and a source of infection for domestic pigs and humans. Based on the epidemiological situation, no risk of a spread of these viruses should emanate from wild boars, neither for wildlife nor for livestock. However, effective and science-based disease monitoring programmes should continuously be carried out in wild boar populations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7088096
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70880962020-03-23 Retrospective serological survey on selected viral pathogens in wild boar populations in Germany Kaden, V. Lange, E. Hänel, A. Hlinak, A. Mewes, L. Hergarten, G. Irsch, B. Dedek, J. Bruer, W. Eur. J. Wildl. Res Original Paper The objective of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the occurrence of porcine parvovirus (PPV), Aujeszky’s disease virus (ADV), transmissible gastroenteritis virus (TGEV), porcine respiratory coronavirus (PRCV), porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) and swine influenza virus (SIV) in selected wild boar populations in Germany (n  = 1,221). Commercial enzyme linked immunosorbent assay and hemagglutination inhibition tests were used for serological monitoring. The serosurvey revealed seroprevalence rates of 64.28%, 11.26%, 7.87%, 7.84%, 3.82% and 1.59% for PPV, ADV, PRCV, SIV, PRRSV and TGEV, respectively. The seroprevalence rates differed between populations and age classes with the highest number of antibody-positive wild boars in older animals (>1 year old). No antibodies to TGEV were found in Baden–Wuerttemberg and in Mecklenburg–Western Pomerania (investigation period 1997/1998). In addition, sera collected in Mecklenburg–Western Pomerania in 1997/1998 were negative for SIV. Even though the seroprevalence rates established for these viruses, except for PPV, were relatively low, wild boars may act as a reservoir for pathogens and a source of infection for domestic pigs and humans. Based on the epidemiological situation, no risk of a spread of these viruses should emanate from wild boars, neither for wildlife nor for livestock. However, effective and science-based disease monitoring programmes should continuously be carried out in wild boar populations. Springer-Verlag 2008-10-17 2009 /pmc/articles/PMC7088096/ /pubmed/32214937 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10344-008-0229-0 Text en © Springer-Verlag 2008 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Kaden, V.
Lange, E.
Hänel, A.
Hlinak, A.
Mewes, L.
Hergarten, G.
Irsch, B.
Dedek, J.
Bruer, W.
Retrospective serological survey on selected viral pathogens in wild boar populations in Germany
title Retrospective serological survey on selected viral pathogens in wild boar populations in Germany
title_full Retrospective serological survey on selected viral pathogens in wild boar populations in Germany
title_fullStr Retrospective serological survey on selected viral pathogens in wild boar populations in Germany
title_full_unstemmed Retrospective serological survey on selected viral pathogens in wild boar populations in Germany
title_short Retrospective serological survey on selected viral pathogens in wild boar populations in Germany
title_sort retrospective serological survey on selected viral pathogens in wild boar populations in germany
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7088096/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32214937
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10344-008-0229-0
work_keys_str_mv AT kadenv retrospectiveserologicalsurveyonselectedviralpathogensinwildboarpopulationsingermany
AT langee retrospectiveserologicalsurveyonselectedviralpathogensinwildboarpopulationsingermany
AT hanela retrospectiveserologicalsurveyonselectedviralpathogensinwildboarpopulationsingermany
AT hlinaka retrospectiveserologicalsurveyonselectedviralpathogensinwildboarpopulationsingermany
AT mewesl retrospectiveserologicalsurveyonselectedviralpathogensinwildboarpopulationsingermany
AT hergarteng retrospectiveserologicalsurveyonselectedviralpathogensinwildboarpopulationsingermany
AT irschb retrospectiveserologicalsurveyonselectedviralpathogensinwildboarpopulationsingermany
AT dedekj retrospectiveserologicalsurveyonselectedviralpathogensinwildboarpopulationsingermany
AT bruerw retrospectiveserologicalsurveyonselectedviralpathogensinwildboarpopulationsingermany