Cargando…

Comparison of six methods for detecting human rotavirus in stools

The following six methods for detecting rotavirus in human faecal samples were compared: electron microscopy, immune electron microscopy, immunofluorescence in cell culture, two enzyme immunoassays (Rotazyme, Enzygnost) and a latex agglutination test (Rotalex). Specimens were collected from 112 chil...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Morinet, F., Ferchal, F., Colimon, R., Pérol, Y.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 1984
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7088116/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6327296
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02014331
Descripción
Sumario:The following six methods for detecting rotavirus in human faecal samples were compared: electron microscopy, immune electron microscopy, immunofluorescence in cell culture, two enzyme immunoassays (Rotazyme, Enzygnost) and a latex agglutination test (Rotalex). Specimens were collected from 112 children with diarrhoea. The relative sensitivities of the different assays for human rotavirus were as follows: electron microscopy, 84%; immunofluorescence, 86%; Rotalex, 88%; Rotazyme, 89%; immune electron microscopy, 93%; Enzygnost, 98%. According to our findings Enzygnost is the most sensitive method, but Rotalex is more valuable for screening a small number of faecal samples. No false-positive results were observed in the two enzyme immunoassays or in Rotalex.