Cargando…

Comparison of six methods for detecting human rotavirus in stools

The following six methods for detecting rotavirus in human faecal samples were compared: electron microscopy, immune electron microscopy, immunofluorescence in cell culture, two enzyme immunoassays (Rotazyme, Enzygnost) and a latex agglutination test (Rotalex). Specimens were collected from 112 chil...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Morinet, F., Ferchal, F., Colimon, R., Pérol, Y.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 1984
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7088116/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6327296
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02014331
_version_ 1783509475639951360
author Morinet, F.
Ferchal, F.
Colimon, R.
Pérol, Y.
author_facet Morinet, F.
Ferchal, F.
Colimon, R.
Pérol, Y.
author_sort Morinet, F.
collection PubMed
description The following six methods for detecting rotavirus in human faecal samples were compared: electron microscopy, immune electron microscopy, immunofluorescence in cell culture, two enzyme immunoassays (Rotazyme, Enzygnost) and a latex agglutination test (Rotalex). Specimens were collected from 112 children with diarrhoea. The relative sensitivities of the different assays for human rotavirus were as follows: electron microscopy, 84%; immunofluorescence, 86%; Rotalex, 88%; Rotazyme, 89%; immune electron microscopy, 93%; Enzygnost, 98%. According to our findings Enzygnost is the most sensitive method, but Rotalex is more valuable for screening a small number of faecal samples. No false-positive results were observed in the two enzyme immunoassays or in Rotalex.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7088116
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1984
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70881162020-03-23 Comparison of six methods for detecting human rotavirus in stools Morinet, F. Ferchal, F. Colimon, R. Pérol, Y. Eur J Clin Microbiol Original Articles The following six methods for detecting rotavirus in human faecal samples were compared: electron microscopy, immune electron microscopy, immunofluorescence in cell culture, two enzyme immunoassays (Rotazyme, Enzygnost) and a latex agglutination test (Rotalex). Specimens were collected from 112 children with diarrhoea. The relative sensitivities of the different assays for human rotavirus were as follows: electron microscopy, 84%; immunofluorescence, 86%; Rotalex, 88%; Rotazyme, 89%; immune electron microscopy, 93%; Enzygnost, 98%. According to our findings Enzygnost is the most sensitive method, but Rotalex is more valuable for screening a small number of faecal samples. No false-positive results were observed in the two enzyme immunoassays or in Rotalex. Springer-Verlag 1984 /pmc/articles/PMC7088116/ /pubmed/6327296 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02014331 Text en © Vieweg Publishing 1984 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Morinet, F.
Ferchal, F.
Colimon, R.
Pérol, Y.
Comparison of six methods for detecting human rotavirus in stools
title Comparison of six methods for detecting human rotavirus in stools
title_full Comparison of six methods for detecting human rotavirus in stools
title_fullStr Comparison of six methods for detecting human rotavirus in stools
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of six methods for detecting human rotavirus in stools
title_short Comparison of six methods for detecting human rotavirus in stools
title_sort comparison of six methods for detecting human rotavirus in stools
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7088116/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6327296
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02014331
work_keys_str_mv AT morinetf comparisonofsixmethodsfordetectinghumanrotavirusinstools
AT ferchalf comparisonofsixmethodsfordetectinghumanrotavirusinstools
AT colimonr comparisonofsixmethodsfordetectinghumanrotavirusinstools
AT peroly comparisonofsixmethodsfordetectinghumanrotavirusinstools