Cargando…

Comparison of automated irrigation systems using an in vitro ureteroscopy model

INTRODUCTION: Two automated irrigation systems have been released for use during endoscopic procedures such as ureteroscopy: the Cogentix RocaFlow® (CRF) and Thermedx FluidSmart® (TFS). Accurate pressure control using automated systems may help providers maintain irrigation pressures within a safe r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fedrigon, Donald, Alshara, Luay, Monga, Manoj
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7088507/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32167702
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2019.0230
_version_ 1783509552052830208
author Fedrigon, Donald
Alshara, Luay
Monga, Manoj
author_facet Fedrigon, Donald
Alshara, Luay
Monga, Manoj
author_sort Fedrigon, Donald
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Two automated irrigation systems have been released for use during endoscopic procedures such as ureteroscopy: the Cogentix RocaFlow® (CRF) and Thermedx FluidSmart® (TFS). Accurate pressure control using automated systems may help providers maintain irrigation pressures within a safe range while also providing clear visualization. Our objective was to directly compare these systems based on their pressure accuracy, pressure-flow relationships, and fluid heating capabilities in order to help providers better utilize the temperature and pressure settings of each system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An in vitro ureteroscopy model was used for testing, consisting of a short semirigid ureteroscope (6/7, 5F, 31cm Wolf 425612) connected to a continuous digital pressure transducer (Meriam m1550). Each system pressure output and flow-rate, via 100mL beaker filling time, was measured using multiple trials at pressure settings between 30 and 300mmHg. Output fluid temperature was monitored using a digital thermometer (Omega DP25-TH). RESULTS: The pressure output of both systems exceeded the desired setting across the entire tested range, a difference of 15.7±2.4mmHg for the TFS compared to 5.2±1.5mmHg for the CRF (p <0.0001). Related to this finding, the TFS also had slightly higher flow rates across all trials (7±2mL/min). Temperature testing revealed a similar maximum temperature of 34.0°C with both systems, however, the TFS peaked after only 8 minutes and started to plateau as early as 4-5 minutes into the test, while the CRF took over 18 minutes to reach a similar peak. CONCLUSIONS: Our in vitro ureteroscopy testing found that the CRF system had better pressure accuracy than the TFS system but with noticeably slower fluid heating capabilities. Each system provided steady irrigation at safe pressures within their expected operating parameters with small differences in performance that should not limit their ability to provide steady irrigation at safe pressures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7088507
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70885072020-04-01 Comparison of automated irrigation systems using an in vitro ureteroscopy model Fedrigon, Donald Alshara, Luay Monga, Manoj Int Braz J Urol Original Article INTRODUCTION: Two automated irrigation systems have been released for use during endoscopic procedures such as ureteroscopy: the Cogentix RocaFlow® (CRF) and Thermedx FluidSmart® (TFS). Accurate pressure control using automated systems may help providers maintain irrigation pressures within a safe range while also providing clear visualization. Our objective was to directly compare these systems based on their pressure accuracy, pressure-flow relationships, and fluid heating capabilities in order to help providers better utilize the temperature and pressure settings of each system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An in vitro ureteroscopy model was used for testing, consisting of a short semirigid ureteroscope (6/7, 5F, 31cm Wolf 425612) connected to a continuous digital pressure transducer (Meriam m1550). Each system pressure output and flow-rate, via 100mL beaker filling time, was measured using multiple trials at pressure settings between 30 and 300mmHg. Output fluid temperature was monitored using a digital thermometer (Omega DP25-TH). RESULTS: The pressure output of both systems exceeded the desired setting across the entire tested range, a difference of 15.7±2.4mmHg for the TFS compared to 5.2±1.5mmHg for the CRF (p <0.0001). Related to this finding, the TFS also had slightly higher flow rates across all trials (7±2mL/min). Temperature testing revealed a similar maximum temperature of 34.0°C with both systems, however, the TFS peaked after only 8 minutes and started to plateau as early as 4-5 minutes into the test, while the CRF took over 18 minutes to reach a similar peak. CONCLUSIONS: Our in vitro ureteroscopy testing found that the CRF system had better pressure accuracy than the TFS system but with noticeably slower fluid heating capabilities. Each system provided steady irrigation at safe pressures within their expected operating parameters with small differences in performance that should not limit their ability to provide steady irrigation at safe pressures. Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2020-02-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7088507/ /pubmed/32167702 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2019.0230 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Fedrigon, Donald
Alshara, Luay
Monga, Manoj
Comparison of automated irrigation systems using an in vitro ureteroscopy model
title Comparison of automated irrigation systems using an in vitro ureteroscopy model
title_full Comparison of automated irrigation systems using an in vitro ureteroscopy model
title_fullStr Comparison of automated irrigation systems using an in vitro ureteroscopy model
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of automated irrigation systems using an in vitro ureteroscopy model
title_short Comparison of automated irrigation systems using an in vitro ureteroscopy model
title_sort comparison of automated irrigation systems using an in vitro ureteroscopy model
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7088507/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32167702
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2019.0230
work_keys_str_mv AT fedrigondonald comparisonofautomatedirrigationsystemsusinganinvitroureteroscopymodel
AT alsharaluay comparisonofautomatedirrigationsystemsusinganinvitroureteroscopymodel
AT mongamanoj comparisonofautomatedirrigationsystemsusinganinvitroureteroscopymodel