Cargando…

Virus rejection with two model human enteric viruses in membrane bioreactor system

A membrane bioreactor (MBR) with gravity drain was tested for virus rejection with two coliphages, T4 and f2, which were used as surrogates for human enteric viruses. Virus rejection was investigated by PVDF and PP membrane modules, with the pore sizes of 0.22 and 0.1 μm, respectively. In tap water...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zheng, Xiang, Liu, JunXin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Science in China Press 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7088775/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11426-007-0047-3
_version_ 1783509609103753216
author Zheng, Xiang
Liu, JunXin
author_facet Zheng, Xiang
Liu, JunXin
author_sort Zheng, Xiang
collection PubMed
description A membrane bioreactor (MBR) with gravity drain was tested for virus rejection with two coliphages, T4 and f2, which were used as surrogates for human enteric viruses. Virus rejection was investigated by PVDF and PP membrane modules, with the pore sizes of 0.22 and 0.1 μm, respectively. In tap water system, 2.1 lg rejection of coliphage T4 could be achieved by PVDF membrane compared with complete rejection by PP membrane, while for coliphage f2 with smaller diameter, 0.3–0.5 lg rejection of the influent virus was removed by the two membranes. In domestic wastewater system, cake layer and gel layer on the membrane surface changed the cut-off size of the membrane so that there was no significant difference between PP and PVDF for each coliphage. The removal ratios of coliphage T4 and f2 in the MBR were more than 5.5 and 3.0 lg, respectively. Compared with 5.5 lg removal for virus T4 in the MBR system, only 2.1 lg (96.8%–99.9%) removal rate was observed in the conventional activated sludge system with the influent virus concentration fluctuating from 1830 to 57000 PFU/mL. Only 0.8%–22% virus removal was the effect of adsorption to activated sludge, which showed a decreasing tendency with the retention time, while 75%–98% was the effect of virus inactivation by microbial activity. It indicated that the major mechanism of virus removal was not the transfer of viruses from the water phase to the sludge phase but inactivation in the biological treatment process.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7088775
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher Science in China Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70887752020-03-23 Virus rejection with two model human enteric viruses in membrane bioreactor system Zheng, Xiang Liu, JunXin Sci China B Chem Article A membrane bioreactor (MBR) with gravity drain was tested for virus rejection with two coliphages, T4 and f2, which were used as surrogates for human enteric viruses. Virus rejection was investigated by PVDF and PP membrane modules, with the pore sizes of 0.22 and 0.1 μm, respectively. In tap water system, 2.1 lg rejection of coliphage T4 could be achieved by PVDF membrane compared with complete rejection by PP membrane, while for coliphage f2 with smaller diameter, 0.3–0.5 lg rejection of the influent virus was removed by the two membranes. In domestic wastewater system, cake layer and gel layer on the membrane surface changed the cut-off size of the membrane so that there was no significant difference between PP and PVDF for each coliphage. The removal ratios of coliphage T4 and f2 in the MBR were more than 5.5 and 3.0 lg, respectively. Compared with 5.5 lg removal for virus T4 in the MBR system, only 2.1 lg (96.8%–99.9%) removal rate was observed in the conventional activated sludge system with the influent virus concentration fluctuating from 1830 to 57000 PFU/mL. Only 0.8%–22% virus removal was the effect of adsorption to activated sludge, which showed a decreasing tendency with the retention time, while 75%–98% was the effect of virus inactivation by microbial activity. It indicated that the major mechanism of virus removal was not the transfer of viruses from the water phase to the sludge phase but inactivation in the biological treatment process. Science in China Press 2007 /pmc/articles/PMC7088775/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11426-007-0047-3 Text en © Science in China Press 2007
spellingShingle Article
Zheng, Xiang
Liu, JunXin
Virus rejection with two model human enteric viruses in membrane bioreactor system
title Virus rejection with two model human enteric viruses in membrane bioreactor system
title_full Virus rejection with two model human enteric viruses in membrane bioreactor system
title_fullStr Virus rejection with two model human enteric viruses in membrane bioreactor system
title_full_unstemmed Virus rejection with two model human enteric viruses in membrane bioreactor system
title_short Virus rejection with two model human enteric viruses in membrane bioreactor system
title_sort virus rejection with two model human enteric viruses in membrane bioreactor system
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7088775/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11426-007-0047-3
work_keys_str_mv AT zhengxiang virusrejectionwithtwomodelhumanentericvirusesinmembranebioreactorsystem
AT liujunxin virusrejectionwithtwomodelhumanentericvirusesinmembranebioreactorsystem