Cargando…

China’s “Gene War of the Century” and Its Aftermath: The Contest Goes On

Following the successful cloning of genes for mostly rare genetic diseases in the early 1990s, there was a nearly universal enthusiasm that similar approaches could be employed to hunt down genes predisposing people to complex diseases. Around 1996, several well-funded international gene-hunting tea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Guo, Sun-Wei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7089372/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32214463
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11024-013-9237-7
_version_ 1783509722772537344
author Guo, Sun-Wei
author_facet Guo, Sun-Wei
author_sort Guo, Sun-Wei
collection PubMed
description Following the successful cloning of genes for mostly rare genetic diseases in the early 1990s, there was a nearly universal enthusiasm that similar approaches could be employed to hunt down genes predisposing people to complex diseases. Around 1996, several well-funded international gene-hunting teams, enticed by the low cost of collecting biological samples and China’s enormous population, and ushered in by some well-connected Chinese intermediaries, came to China to hunt down disease susceptibility genes. This alarmed and, in some cases, enraged many poorly funded Chinese scientists, who perceived them as formidable competitors. Some depicted foreign gene-hunters as greedy pilferers of the vast Chinese genetic gold mine, comparing it to the plundering of national treasures from China by invaders in the past, and called upon the government and their fellow countrymen to rise up and protect China’s genetic gold mine. Media uproar ensued, proclaiming the imminent “gene war of the century.” This article chronicles the key events surrounding this “war” and its aftermath, exposes some inherent complexities in identifying susceptibility genes for complex diseases, highlights some issues obscured or completely overlooked in the passionate and patriotic rhetoric, and debunks some misconceptions embedded in this conflict. In addition, it argues that during the entire course of this “war,” the public’s interest went conspicuously unmentioned. Finally, it articulates several lessons that can be learned from this conflict, and outlines challenges facing human genetics researchers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7089372
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70893722020-03-23 China’s “Gene War of the Century” and Its Aftermath: The Contest Goes On Guo, Sun-Wei Minerva Article Following the successful cloning of genes for mostly rare genetic diseases in the early 1990s, there was a nearly universal enthusiasm that similar approaches could be employed to hunt down genes predisposing people to complex diseases. Around 1996, several well-funded international gene-hunting teams, enticed by the low cost of collecting biological samples and China’s enormous population, and ushered in by some well-connected Chinese intermediaries, came to China to hunt down disease susceptibility genes. This alarmed and, in some cases, enraged many poorly funded Chinese scientists, who perceived them as formidable competitors. Some depicted foreign gene-hunters as greedy pilferers of the vast Chinese genetic gold mine, comparing it to the plundering of national treasures from China by invaders in the past, and called upon the government and their fellow countrymen to rise up and protect China’s genetic gold mine. Media uproar ensued, proclaiming the imminent “gene war of the century.” This article chronicles the key events surrounding this “war” and its aftermath, exposes some inherent complexities in identifying susceptibility genes for complex diseases, highlights some issues obscured or completely overlooked in the passionate and patriotic rhetoric, and debunks some misconceptions embedded in this conflict. In addition, it argues that during the entire course of this “war,” the public’s interest went conspicuously unmentioned. Finally, it articulates several lessons that can be learned from this conflict, and outlines challenges facing human genetics researchers. Springer Netherlands 2013-08-30 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC7089372/ /pubmed/32214463 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11024-013-9237-7 Text en © Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Article
Guo, Sun-Wei
China’s “Gene War of the Century” and Its Aftermath: The Contest Goes On
title China’s “Gene War of the Century” and Its Aftermath: The Contest Goes On
title_full China’s “Gene War of the Century” and Its Aftermath: The Contest Goes On
title_fullStr China’s “Gene War of the Century” and Its Aftermath: The Contest Goes On
title_full_unstemmed China’s “Gene War of the Century” and Its Aftermath: The Contest Goes On
title_short China’s “Gene War of the Century” and Its Aftermath: The Contest Goes On
title_sort china’s “gene war of the century” and its aftermath: the contest goes on
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7089372/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32214463
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11024-013-9237-7
work_keys_str_mv AT guosunwei chinasgenewarofthecenturyanditsaftermaththecontestgoeson