Cargando…

Treatment Satisfaction Among Patients Using Anti-Inflammatory Topical Medications for Dry Eye Disease

PURPOSE: To assess patient satisfaction among current and former users of the anti-inflammatory topical medications, cyclosporine A 0.05% (CYC) and lifitegrast 5.0% (LIF), for the management of dry eye disease (DED). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with DED were recruited via physician referral to pa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: White, Darrell E, Zhao, Yang, Jayapalan, Hemalatha, Machiraju, Pattabhi, Periyasamy, Ramu, Ogundele, Abayomi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7089601/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32256045
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S233194
_version_ 1783509767332823040
author White, Darrell E
Zhao, Yang
Jayapalan, Hemalatha
Machiraju, Pattabhi
Periyasamy, Ramu
Ogundele, Abayomi
author_facet White, Darrell E
Zhao, Yang
Jayapalan, Hemalatha
Machiraju, Pattabhi
Periyasamy, Ramu
Ogundele, Abayomi
author_sort White, Darrell E
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To assess patient satisfaction among current and former users of the anti-inflammatory topical medications, cyclosporine A 0.05% (CYC) and lifitegrast 5.0% (LIF), for the management of dry eye disease (DED). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with DED were recruited via physician referral to participate in a survey. Current users of CYC or LIF were asked to rate their experience in terms of satisfaction, side effects, and limitation of activities. Switchers of CYC to LIF or LIF to CYC were asked to rate the importance of potential reasons for switching. RESULTS: Surveys were completed by 207 patients currently treated with CYC (n=98), LIF (n=96), or other DED medications (n=13). Although overall satisfaction with current treatment was high, current users of CYC and LIF reported ineffective relief of DED symptoms (31% and 22%, respectively) and dissatisfaction with the time to onset of effect (29% and 11%). Substantial proportions of patients reported ‘sometimes’, “usually”, or ‘always’ experiencing the following side effects: burning sensation (72% CYC, 64% LIF), itching (43% CYC, 44% LIF), altered sensation of taste (21% CYC, 56% LIF), blurred vision (37% CYC, 50% LIF), and discharge (28% CYC, 30% LIF). Of the 30 switchers of CYC to LIF and 31 switchers of LIF to CYC, the majority reported inability to relieve DED symptoms as a very or extremely important switching reason. Despite switching, one in four patients were somewhat dissatisfied or dissatisfied with their current medication, with 37% of patients reporting ineffective symptom relief. CONCLUSION: Although the rate of overall satisfaction was generally high with both LIF and CYC, many patients were unable to achieve effective symptom relief and commonly experienced side effects. The proportion of patients who were dissatisfied and/or unable to achieve effective symptom relief even after switching suggests the need for additional treatment options for managing DED.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7089601
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70896012020-04-01 Treatment Satisfaction Among Patients Using Anti-Inflammatory Topical Medications for Dry Eye Disease White, Darrell E Zhao, Yang Jayapalan, Hemalatha Machiraju, Pattabhi Periyasamy, Ramu Ogundele, Abayomi Clin Ophthalmol Original Research PURPOSE: To assess patient satisfaction among current and former users of the anti-inflammatory topical medications, cyclosporine A 0.05% (CYC) and lifitegrast 5.0% (LIF), for the management of dry eye disease (DED). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with DED were recruited via physician referral to participate in a survey. Current users of CYC or LIF were asked to rate their experience in terms of satisfaction, side effects, and limitation of activities. Switchers of CYC to LIF or LIF to CYC were asked to rate the importance of potential reasons for switching. RESULTS: Surveys were completed by 207 patients currently treated with CYC (n=98), LIF (n=96), or other DED medications (n=13). Although overall satisfaction with current treatment was high, current users of CYC and LIF reported ineffective relief of DED symptoms (31% and 22%, respectively) and dissatisfaction with the time to onset of effect (29% and 11%). Substantial proportions of patients reported ‘sometimes’, “usually”, or ‘always’ experiencing the following side effects: burning sensation (72% CYC, 64% LIF), itching (43% CYC, 44% LIF), altered sensation of taste (21% CYC, 56% LIF), blurred vision (37% CYC, 50% LIF), and discharge (28% CYC, 30% LIF). Of the 30 switchers of CYC to LIF and 31 switchers of LIF to CYC, the majority reported inability to relieve DED symptoms as a very or extremely important switching reason. Despite switching, one in four patients were somewhat dissatisfied or dissatisfied with their current medication, with 37% of patients reporting ineffective symptom relief. CONCLUSION: Although the rate of overall satisfaction was generally high with both LIF and CYC, many patients were unable to achieve effective symptom relief and commonly experienced side effects. The proportion of patients who were dissatisfied and/or unable to achieve effective symptom relief even after switching suggests the need for additional treatment options for managing DED. Dove 2020-03-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7089601/ /pubmed/32256045 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S233194 Text en © 2020 White et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
White, Darrell E
Zhao, Yang
Jayapalan, Hemalatha
Machiraju, Pattabhi
Periyasamy, Ramu
Ogundele, Abayomi
Treatment Satisfaction Among Patients Using Anti-Inflammatory Topical Medications for Dry Eye Disease
title Treatment Satisfaction Among Patients Using Anti-Inflammatory Topical Medications for Dry Eye Disease
title_full Treatment Satisfaction Among Patients Using Anti-Inflammatory Topical Medications for Dry Eye Disease
title_fullStr Treatment Satisfaction Among Patients Using Anti-Inflammatory Topical Medications for Dry Eye Disease
title_full_unstemmed Treatment Satisfaction Among Patients Using Anti-Inflammatory Topical Medications for Dry Eye Disease
title_short Treatment Satisfaction Among Patients Using Anti-Inflammatory Topical Medications for Dry Eye Disease
title_sort treatment satisfaction among patients using anti-inflammatory topical medications for dry eye disease
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7089601/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32256045
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S233194
work_keys_str_mv AT whitedarrelle treatmentsatisfactionamongpatientsusingantiinflammatorytopicalmedicationsfordryeyedisease
AT zhaoyang treatmentsatisfactionamongpatientsusingantiinflammatorytopicalmedicationsfordryeyedisease
AT jayapalanhemalatha treatmentsatisfactionamongpatientsusingantiinflammatorytopicalmedicationsfordryeyedisease
AT machirajupattabhi treatmentsatisfactionamongpatientsusingantiinflammatorytopicalmedicationsfordryeyedisease
AT periyasamyramu treatmentsatisfactionamongpatientsusingantiinflammatorytopicalmedicationsfordryeyedisease
AT ogundeleabayomi treatmentsatisfactionamongpatientsusingantiinflammatorytopicalmedicationsfordryeyedisease