Cargando…
Treatment Satisfaction Among Patients Using Anti-Inflammatory Topical Medications for Dry Eye Disease
PURPOSE: To assess patient satisfaction among current and former users of the anti-inflammatory topical medications, cyclosporine A 0.05% (CYC) and lifitegrast 5.0% (LIF), for the management of dry eye disease (DED). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with DED were recruited via physician referral to pa...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7089601/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32256045 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S233194 |
_version_ | 1783509767332823040 |
---|---|
author | White, Darrell E Zhao, Yang Jayapalan, Hemalatha Machiraju, Pattabhi Periyasamy, Ramu Ogundele, Abayomi |
author_facet | White, Darrell E Zhao, Yang Jayapalan, Hemalatha Machiraju, Pattabhi Periyasamy, Ramu Ogundele, Abayomi |
author_sort | White, Darrell E |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To assess patient satisfaction among current and former users of the anti-inflammatory topical medications, cyclosporine A 0.05% (CYC) and lifitegrast 5.0% (LIF), for the management of dry eye disease (DED). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with DED were recruited via physician referral to participate in a survey. Current users of CYC or LIF were asked to rate their experience in terms of satisfaction, side effects, and limitation of activities. Switchers of CYC to LIF or LIF to CYC were asked to rate the importance of potential reasons for switching. RESULTS: Surveys were completed by 207 patients currently treated with CYC (n=98), LIF (n=96), or other DED medications (n=13). Although overall satisfaction with current treatment was high, current users of CYC and LIF reported ineffective relief of DED symptoms (31% and 22%, respectively) and dissatisfaction with the time to onset of effect (29% and 11%). Substantial proportions of patients reported ‘sometimes’, “usually”, or ‘always’ experiencing the following side effects: burning sensation (72% CYC, 64% LIF), itching (43% CYC, 44% LIF), altered sensation of taste (21% CYC, 56% LIF), blurred vision (37% CYC, 50% LIF), and discharge (28% CYC, 30% LIF). Of the 30 switchers of CYC to LIF and 31 switchers of LIF to CYC, the majority reported inability to relieve DED symptoms as a very or extremely important switching reason. Despite switching, one in four patients were somewhat dissatisfied or dissatisfied with their current medication, with 37% of patients reporting ineffective symptom relief. CONCLUSION: Although the rate of overall satisfaction was generally high with both LIF and CYC, many patients were unable to achieve effective symptom relief and commonly experienced side effects. The proportion of patients who were dissatisfied and/or unable to achieve effective symptom relief even after switching suggests the need for additional treatment options for managing DED. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7089601 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70896012020-04-01 Treatment Satisfaction Among Patients Using Anti-Inflammatory Topical Medications for Dry Eye Disease White, Darrell E Zhao, Yang Jayapalan, Hemalatha Machiraju, Pattabhi Periyasamy, Ramu Ogundele, Abayomi Clin Ophthalmol Original Research PURPOSE: To assess patient satisfaction among current and former users of the anti-inflammatory topical medications, cyclosporine A 0.05% (CYC) and lifitegrast 5.0% (LIF), for the management of dry eye disease (DED). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with DED were recruited via physician referral to participate in a survey. Current users of CYC or LIF were asked to rate their experience in terms of satisfaction, side effects, and limitation of activities. Switchers of CYC to LIF or LIF to CYC were asked to rate the importance of potential reasons for switching. RESULTS: Surveys were completed by 207 patients currently treated with CYC (n=98), LIF (n=96), or other DED medications (n=13). Although overall satisfaction with current treatment was high, current users of CYC and LIF reported ineffective relief of DED symptoms (31% and 22%, respectively) and dissatisfaction with the time to onset of effect (29% and 11%). Substantial proportions of patients reported ‘sometimes’, “usually”, or ‘always’ experiencing the following side effects: burning sensation (72% CYC, 64% LIF), itching (43% CYC, 44% LIF), altered sensation of taste (21% CYC, 56% LIF), blurred vision (37% CYC, 50% LIF), and discharge (28% CYC, 30% LIF). Of the 30 switchers of CYC to LIF and 31 switchers of LIF to CYC, the majority reported inability to relieve DED symptoms as a very or extremely important switching reason. Despite switching, one in four patients were somewhat dissatisfied or dissatisfied with their current medication, with 37% of patients reporting ineffective symptom relief. CONCLUSION: Although the rate of overall satisfaction was generally high with both LIF and CYC, many patients were unable to achieve effective symptom relief and commonly experienced side effects. The proportion of patients who were dissatisfied and/or unable to achieve effective symptom relief even after switching suggests the need for additional treatment options for managing DED. Dove 2020-03-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7089601/ /pubmed/32256045 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S233194 Text en © 2020 White et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Original Research White, Darrell E Zhao, Yang Jayapalan, Hemalatha Machiraju, Pattabhi Periyasamy, Ramu Ogundele, Abayomi Treatment Satisfaction Among Patients Using Anti-Inflammatory Topical Medications for Dry Eye Disease |
title | Treatment Satisfaction Among Patients Using Anti-Inflammatory Topical Medications for Dry Eye Disease |
title_full | Treatment Satisfaction Among Patients Using Anti-Inflammatory Topical Medications for Dry Eye Disease |
title_fullStr | Treatment Satisfaction Among Patients Using Anti-Inflammatory Topical Medications for Dry Eye Disease |
title_full_unstemmed | Treatment Satisfaction Among Patients Using Anti-Inflammatory Topical Medications for Dry Eye Disease |
title_short | Treatment Satisfaction Among Patients Using Anti-Inflammatory Topical Medications for Dry Eye Disease |
title_sort | treatment satisfaction among patients using anti-inflammatory topical medications for dry eye disease |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7089601/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32256045 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S233194 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT whitedarrelle treatmentsatisfactionamongpatientsusingantiinflammatorytopicalmedicationsfordryeyedisease AT zhaoyang treatmentsatisfactionamongpatientsusingantiinflammatorytopicalmedicationsfordryeyedisease AT jayapalanhemalatha treatmentsatisfactionamongpatientsusingantiinflammatorytopicalmedicationsfordryeyedisease AT machirajupattabhi treatmentsatisfactionamongpatientsusingantiinflammatorytopicalmedicationsfordryeyedisease AT periyasamyramu treatmentsatisfactionamongpatientsusingantiinflammatorytopicalmedicationsfordryeyedisease AT ogundeleabayomi treatmentsatisfactionamongpatientsusingantiinflammatorytopicalmedicationsfordryeyedisease |