Cargando…

Statistical analysis of differential equations: introducing probability measures on numerical solutions

In this paper, we present a formal quantification of uncertainty induced by numerical solutions of ordinary and partial differential equation models. Numerical solutions of differential equations contain inherent uncertainties due to the finite-dimensional approximation of an unknown and implicitly...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Conrad, Patrick R., Girolami, Mark, Särkkä, Simo, Stuart, Andrew, Zygalakis, Konstantinos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7089645/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32226237
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11222-016-9671-0
_version_ 1783509776507863040
author Conrad, Patrick R.
Girolami, Mark
Särkkä, Simo
Stuart, Andrew
Zygalakis, Konstantinos
author_facet Conrad, Patrick R.
Girolami, Mark
Särkkä, Simo
Stuart, Andrew
Zygalakis, Konstantinos
author_sort Conrad, Patrick R.
collection PubMed
description In this paper, we present a formal quantification of uncertainty induced by numerical solutions of ordinary and partial differential equation models. Numerical solutions of differential equations contain inherent uncertainties due to the finite-dimensional approximation of an unknown and implicitly defined function. When statistically analysing models based on differential equations describing physical, or other naturally occurring, phenomena, it can be important to explicitly account for the uncertainty introduced by the numerical method. Doing so enables objective determination of this source of uncertainty, relative to other uncertainties, such as those caused by data contaminated with noise or model error induced by missing physical or inadequate descriptors. As ever larger scale mathematical models are being used in the sciences, often sacrificing complete resolution of the differential equation on the grids used, formally accounting for the uncertainty in the numerical method is becoming increasingly more important. This paper provides the formal means to incorporate this uncertainty in a statistical model and its subsequent analysis. We show that a wide variety of existing solvers can be randomised, inducing a probability measure over the solutions of such differential equations. These measures exhibit contraction to a Dirac measure around the true unknown solution, where the rates of convergence are consistent with the underlying deterministic numerical method. Furthermore, we employ the method of modified equations to demonstrate enhanced rates of convergence to stochastic perturbations of the original deterministic problem. Ordinary differential equations and elliptic partial differential equations are used to illustrate the approach to quantify uncertainty in both the statistical analysis of the forward and inverse problems. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11222-016-9671-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7089645
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70896452020-03-26 Statistical analysis of differential equations: introducing probability measures on numerical solutions Conrad, Patrick R. Girolami, Mark Särkkä, Simo Stuart, Andrew Zygalakis, Konstantinos Stat Comput Article In this paper, we present a formal quantification of uncertainty induced by numerical solutions of ordinary and partial differential equation models. Numerical solutions of differential equations contain inherent uncertainties due to the finite-dimensional approximation of an unknown and implicitly defined function. When statistically analysing models based on differential equations describing physical, or other naturally occurring, phenomena, it can be important to explicitly account for the uncertainty introduced by the numerical method. Doing so enables objective determination of this source of uncertainty, relative to other uncertainties, such as those caused by data contaminated with noise or model error induced by missing physical or inadequate descriptors. As ever larger scale mathematical models are being used in the sciences, often sacrificing complete resolution of the differential equation on the grids used, formally accounting for the uncertainty in the numerical method is becoming increasingly more important. This paper provides the formal means to incorporate this uncertainty in a statistical model and its subsequent analysis. We show that a wide variety of existing solvers can be randomised, inducing a probability measure over the solutions of such differential equations. These measures exhibit contraction to a Dirac measure around the true unknown solution, where the rates of convergence are consistent with the underlying deterministic numerical method. Furthermore, we employ the method of modified equations to demonstrate enhanced rates of convergence to stochastic perturbations of the original deterministic problem. Ordinary differential equations and elliptic partial differential equations are used to illustrate the approach to quantify uncertainty in both the statistical analysis of the forward and inverse problems. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11222-016-9671-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2016-06-02 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC7089645/ /pubmed/32226237 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11222-016-9671-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Article
Conrad, Patrick R.
Girolami, Mark
Särkkä, Simo
Stuart, Andrew
Zygalakis, Konstantinos
Statistical analysis of differential equations: introducing probability measures on numerical solutions
title Statistical analysis of differential equations: introducing probability measures on numerical solutions
title_full Statistical analysis of differential equations: introducing probability measures on numerical solutions
title_fullStr Statistical analysis of differential equations: introducing probability measures on numerical solutions
title_full_unstemmed Statistical analysis of differential equations: introducing probability measures on numerical solutions
title_short Statistical analysis of differential equations: introducing probability measures on numerical solutions
title_sort statistical analysis of differential equations: introducing probability measures on numerical solutions
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7089645/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32226237
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11222-016-9671-0
work_keys_str_mv AT conradpatrickr statisticalanalysisofdifferentialequationsintroducingprobabilitymeasuresonnumericalsolutions
AT girolamimark statisticalanalysisofdifferentialequationsintroducingprobabilitymeasuresonnumericalsolutions
AT sarkkasimo statisticalanalysisofdifferentialequationsintroducingprobabilitymeasuresonnumericalsolutions
AT stuartandrew statisticalanalysisofdifferentialequationsintroducingprobabilitymeasuresonnumericalsolutions
AT zygalakiskonstantinos statisticalanalysisofdifferentialequationsintroducingprobabilitymeasuresonnumericalsolutions