Cargando…

Does the canopy mixing layer model apply to highly flexible aquatic vegetation? Insights from numerical modelling

Vegetation is a characteristic feature of shallow aquatic flows such as rivers, lakes and coastal waters. Flow through and above aquatic vegetation canopies is commonly described using a canopy mixing layer analogy which provides a canonical framework for assessing key hydraulic characteristics such...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marjoribanks, Timothy I., Hardy, Richard J., Lane, Stuart N., Parsons, Daniel R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7089683/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32226354
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10652-016-9482-z
_version_ 1783509783018471424
author Marjoribanks, Timothy I.
Hardy, Richard J.
Lane, Stuart N.
Parsons, Daniel R.
author_facet Marjoribanks, Timothy I.
Hardy, Richard J.
Lane, Stuart N.
Parsons, Daniel R.
author_sort Marjoribanks, Timothy I.
collection PubMed
description Vegetation is a characteristic feature of shallow aquatic flows such as rivers, lakes and coastal waters. Flow through and above aquatic vegetation canopies is commonly described using a canopy mixing layer analogy which provides a canonical framework for assessing key hydraulic characteristics such as velocity profiles, large-scale coherent turbulent structures and mixing and transport processes for solutes and sediments. This theory is well developed for the case of semi-rigid terrestrial vegetation and has more recently been applied to the case of aquatic vegetation. However, aquatic vegetation often displays key differences in morphology and biomechanics to terrestrial vegetation due to the different environment it inhabits. Here we investigate the effect of plant morphology and biomechanical properties on flow–vegetation interactions through the application of a coupled LES-biomechanical model. We present results from two simulations of aquatic vegetated flows: one assuming a semi-rigid canopy and the other a highly flexible canopy and provide a comparison of the associated flow regimes. Our results show that while both cases display canopy mixing layers, there are also clear differences in the shear layer characteristics and turbulent processes between the two, suggesting that the semi-rigid approximation may not provide a complete representation of flow–vegetation interactions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7089683
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70896832020-03-26 Does the canopy mixing layer model apply to highly flexible aquatic vegetation? Insights from numerical modelling Marjoribanks, Timothy I. Hardy, Richard J. Lane, Stuart N. Parsons, Daniel R. Environ Fluid Mech (Dordr) Original Article Vegetation is a characteristic feature of shallow aquatic flows such as rivers, lakes and coastal waters. Flow through and above aquatic vegetation canopies is commonly described using a canopy mixing layer analogy which provides a canonical framework for assessing key hydraulic characteristics such as velocity profiles, large-scale coherent turbulent structures and mixing and transport processes for solutes and sediments. This theory is well developed for the case of semi-rigid terrestrial vegetation and has more recently been applied to the case of aquatic vegetation. However, aquatic vegetation often displays key differences in morphology and biomechanics to terrestrial vegetation due to the different environment it inhabits. Here we investigate the effect of plant morphology and biomechanical properties on flow–vegetation interactions through the application of a coupled LES-biomechanical model. We present results from two simulations of aquatic vegetated flows: one assuming a semi-rigid canopy and the other a highly flexible canopy and provide a comparison of the associated flow regimes. Our results show that while both cases display canopy mixing layers, there are also clear differences in the shear layer characteristics and turbulent processes between the two, suggesting that the semi-rigid approximation may not provide a complete representation of flow–vegetation interactions. Springer Netherlands 2016-11-02 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC7089683/ /pubmed/32226354 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10652-016-9482-z Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Marjoribanks, Timothy I.
Hardy, Richard J.
Lane, Stuart N.
Parsons, Daniel R.
Does the canopy mixing layer model apply to highly flexible aquatic vegetation? Insights from numerical modelling
title Does the canopy mixing layer model apply to highly flexible aquatic vegetation? Insights from numerical modelling
title_full Does the canopy mixing layer model apply to highly flexible aquatic vegetation? Insights from numerical modelling
title_fullStr Does the canopy mixing layer model apply to highly flexible aquatic vegetation? Insights from numerical modelling
title_full_unstemmed Does the canopy mixing layer model apply to highly flexible aquatic vegetation? Insights from numerical modelling
title_short Does the canopy mixing layer model apply to highly flexible aquatic vegetation? Insights from numerical modelling
title_sort does the canopy mixing layer model apply to highly flexible aquatic vegetation? insights from numerical modelling
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7089683/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32226354
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10652-016-9482-z
work_keys_str_mv AT marjoribankstimothyi doesthecanopymixinglayermodelapplytohighlyflexibleaquaticvegetationinsightsfromnumericalmodelling
AT hardyrichardj doesthecanopymixinglayermodelapplytohighlyflexibleaquaticvegetationinsightsfromnumericalmodelling
AT lanestuartn doesthecanopymixinglayermodelapplytohighlyflexibleaquaticvegetationinsightsfromnumericalmodelling
AT parsonsdanielr doesthecanopymixinglayermodelapplytohighlyflexibleaquaticvegetationinsightsfromnumericalmodelling