Cargando…
Team Reasoning and the Rational Choice of Payoff-Dominant Outcomes in Games
Standard game theory cannot explain the selection of payoff-dominant outcomes that are best for all players in common-interest games. Theories of team reasoning can explain why such mutualistic cooperation is rational. They propose that teams can be agents and that individuals in teams can adopt a d...
Autores principales: | Gold, Natalie, Colman, Andrew M. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7089898/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32226179 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11245-018-9575-z |
Ejemplares similares
-
Effects of Network Characteristics on Reaching the Payoff-Dominant Equilibrium in Coordination Games: A Simulation study
por: Buskens, Vincent, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Solving Mean-Payoff Games via Quasi Dominions
por: Benerecetti, Massimo, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
What Is True Halving in the Payoff Matrix of Game Theory?
por: Ito, Hiromu, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Existence of equilibria in repeated games with long-run payoffs
por: Ashkenazi-Golan, Galit, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
A Fast Approach to Bimatrix Games with Intuitionistic Fuzzy Payoffs
por: Fan, Min, et al.
Publicado: (2014)