Cargando…
Right Atrial Deformation Using Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Myocardial Feature Tracking Compared with Two-Dimensional Speckle Tracking Echocardiography in Healthy Volunteers
Speckle tracking echocardiography (STE), and more recently, cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial feature tracking (CMR-FT) provides insight into all phases of atrial function. The aim of our study was to compare all phases of RA strain using CMR-FT and STE and also assess the relationship be...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7089993/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32251322 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-62105-9 |
_version_ | 1783509837131284480 |
---|---|
author | Truong, Vien T. Palmer, Cassady Young, Michael Wolking, Sarah Ngo, Tam N. M. Sheets, Brandy Hausfeld, Chelsey Ornella, Allison Taylor, Michael D. Zareba, Karolina M. Raman, Subha V. Mazur, Wojciech |
author_facet | Truong, Vien T. Palmer, Cassady Young, Michael Wolking, Sarah Ngo, Tam N. M. Sheets, Brandy Hausfeld, Chelsey Ornella, Allison Taylor, Michael D. Zareba, Karolina M. Raman, Subha V. Mazur, Wojciech |
author_sort | Truong, Vien T. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Speckle tracking echocardiography (STE), and more recently, cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial feature tracking (CMR-FT) provides insight into all phases of atrial function. The aim of our study was to compare all phases of RA strain using CMR-FT and STE and also assess the relationship between RA and LA strain. A total of 61 healthy volunteers with mean age of 45 ± 13 years had adequate tracking for analysis on CMR-FT and 2D-STE. Females had larger RA reservoir strain (39 ± 15% vs. 32 ± 13%, p = 0.046) and conduit strain (26 ± 12% vs. 20 ± 9%, p = 0.03) when compared to males, but was not the case with booster strain (14 ± 7% vs. 12 ± 6%, p = 0.45). In comparison with STE derived strain, the RA reservoir and conduit strain were not significantly different between CMR-FT and the three echocardiography gating methods (p > 0.05 for all). Noticeably, there were no significant differences in strain and strain rate between RA and LA function using CMR-FT (p > 0.05 for all). RA strain and strain rate using CMR-FT had fair and good intra- and inter-observer reproducibility and had superior reproducibility compared to STE derived strain. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7089993 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70899932020-03-26 Right Atrial Deformation Using Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Myocardial Feature Tracking Compared with Two-Dimensional Speckle Tracking Echocardiography in Healthy Volunteers Truong, Vien T. Palmer, Cassady Young, Michael Wolking, Sarah Ngo, Tam N. M. Sheets, Brandy Hausfeld, Chelsey Ornella, Allison Taylor, Michael D. Zareba, Karolina M. Raman, Subha V. Mazur, Wojciech Sci Rep Article Speckle tracking echocardiography (STE), and more recently, cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial feature tracking (CMR-FT) provides insight into all phases of atrial function. The aim of our study was to compare all phases of RA strain using CMR-FT and STE and also assess the relationship between RA and LA strain. A total of 61 healthy volunteers with mean age of 45 ± 13 years had adequate tracking for analysis on CMR-FT and 2D-STE. Females had larger RA reservoir strain (39 ± 15% vs. 32 ± 13%, p = 0.046) and conduit strain (26 ± 12% vs. 20 ± 9%, p = 0.03) when compared to males, but was not the case with booster strain (14 ± 7% vs. 12 ± 6%, p = 0.45). In comparison with STE derived strain, the RA reservoir and conduit strain were not significantly different between CMR-FT and the three echocardiography gating methods (p > 0.05 for all). Noticeably, there were no significant differences in strain and strain rate between RA and LA function using CMR-FT (p > 0.05 for all). RA strain and strain rate using CMR-FT had fair and good intra- and inter-observer reproducibility and had superior reproducibility compared to STE derived strain. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-03-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7089993/ /pubmed/32251322 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-62105-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Truong, Vien T. Palmer, Cassady Young, Michael Wolking, Sarah Ngo, Tam N. M. Sheets, Brandy Hausfeld, Chelsey Ornella, Allison Taylor, Michael D. Zareba, Karolina M. Raman, Subha V. Mazur, Wojciech Right Atrial Deformation Using Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Myocardial Feature Tracking Compared with Two-Dimensional Speckle Tracking Echocardiography in Healthy Volunteers |
title | Right Atrial Deformation Using Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Myocardial Feature Tracking Compared with Two-Dimensional Speckle Tracking Echocardiography in Healthy Volunteers |
title_full | Right Atrial Deformation Using Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Myocardial Feature Tracking Compared with Two-Dimensional Speckle Tracking Echocardiography in Healthy Volunteers |
title_fullStr | Right Atrial Deformation Using Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Myocardial Feature Tracking Compared with Two-Dimensional Speckle Tracking Echocardiography in Healthy Volunteers |
title_full_unstemmed | Right Atrial Deformation Using Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Myocardial Feature Tracking Compared with Two-Dimensional Speckle Tracking Echocardiography in Healthy Volunteers |
title_short | Right Atrial Deformation Using Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Myocardial Feature Tracking Compared with Two-Dimensional Speckle Tracking Echocardiography in Healthy Volunteers |
title_sort | right atrial deformation using cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial feature tracking compared with two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography in healthy volunteers |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7089993/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32251322 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-62105-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT truongvient rightatrialdeformationusingcardiovascularmagneticresonancemyocardialfeaturetrackingcomparedwithtwodimensionalspeckletrackingechocardiographyinhealthyvolunteers AT palmercassady rightatrialdeformationusingcardiovascularmagneticresonancemyocardialfeaturetrackingcomparedwithtwodimensionalspeckletrackingechocardiographyinhealthyvolunteers AT youngmichael rightatrialdeformationusingcardiovascularmagneticresonancemyocardialfeaturetrackingcomparedwithtwodimensionalspeckletrackingechocardiographyinhealthyvolunteers AT wolkingsarah rightatrialdeformationusingcardiovascularmagneticresonancemyocardialfeaturetrackingcomparedwithtwodimensionalspeckletrackingechocardiographyinhealthyvolunteers AT ngotamnm rightatrialdeformationusingcardiovascularmagneticresonancemyocardialfeaturetrackingcomparedwithtwodimensionalspeckletrackingechocardiographyinhealthyvolunteers AT sheetsbrandy rightatrialdeformationusingcardiovascularmagneticresonancemyocardialfeaturetrackingcomparedwithtwodimensionalspeckletrackingechocardiographyinhealthyvolunteers AT hausfeldchelsey rightatrialdeformationusingcardiovascularmagneticresonancemyocardialfeaturetrackingcomparedwithtwodimensionalspeckletrackingechocardiographyinhealthyvolunteers AT ornellaallison rightatrialdeformationusingcardiovascularmagneticresonancemyocardialfeaturetrackingcomparedwithtwodimensionalspeckletrackingechocardiographyinhealthyvolunteers AT taylormichaeld rightatrialdeformationusingcardiovascularmagneticresonancemyocardialfeaturetrackingcomparedwithtwodimensionalspeckletrackingechocardiographyinhealthyvolunteers AT zarebakarolinam rightatrialdeformationusingcardiovascularmagneticresonancemyocardialfeaturetrackingcomparedwithtwodimensionalspeckletrackingechocardiographyinhealthyvolunteers AT ramansubhav rightatrialdeformationusingcardiovascularmagneticresonancemyocardialfeaturetrackingcomparedwithtwodimensionalspeckletrackingechocardiographyinhealthyvolunteers AT mazurwojciech rightatrialdeformationusingcardiovascularmagneticresonancemyocardialfeaturetrackingcomparedwithtwodimensionalspeckletrackingechocardiographyinhealthyvolunteers |