Cargando…

Right Atrial Deformation Using Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Myocardial Feature Tracking Compared with Two-Dimensional Speckle Tracking Echocardiography in Healthy Volunteers

Speckle tracking echocardiography (STE), and more recently, cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial feature tracking (CMR-FT) provides insight into all phases of atrial function. The aim of our study was to compare all phases of RA strain using CMR-FT and STE and also assess the relationship be...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Truong, Vien T., Palmer, Cassady, Young, Michael, Wolking, Sarah, Ngo, Tam N. M., Sheets, Brandy, Hausfeld, Chelsey, Ornella, Allison, Taylor, Michael D., Zareba, Karolina M., Raman, Subha V., Mazur, Wojciech
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7089993/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32251322
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-62105-9
_version_ 1783509837131284480
author Truong, Vien T.
Palmer, Cassady
Young, Michael
Wolking, Sarah
Ngo, Tam N. M.
Sheets, Brandy
Hausfeld, Chelsey
Ornella, Allison
Taylor, Michael D.
Zareba, Karolina M.
Raman, Subha V.
Mazur, Wojciech
author_facet Truong, Vien T.
Palmer, Cassady
Young, Michael
Wolking, Sarah
Ngo, Tam N. M.
Sheets, Brandy
Hausfeld, Chelsey
Ornella, Allison
Taylor, Michael D.
Zareba, Karolina M.
Raman, Subha V.
Mazur, Wojciech
author_sort Truong, Vien T.
collection PubMed
description Speckle tracking echocardiography (STE), and more recently, cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial feature tracking (CMR-FT) provides insight into all phases of atrial function. The aim of our study was to compare all phases of RA strain using CMR-FT and STE and also assess the relationship between RA and LA strain. A total of 61 healthy volunteers with mean age of 45 ± 13 years had adequate tracking for analysis on CMR-FT and 2D-STE. Females had larger RA reservoir strain (39 ± 15% vs. 32 ± 13%, p = 0.046) and conduit strain (26 ± 12% vs. 20 ± 9%, p = 0.03) when compared to males, but was not the case with booster strain (14 ± 7% vs. 12 ± 6%, p = 0.45). In comparison with STE derived strain, the RA reservoir and conduit strain were not significantly different between CMR-FT and the three echocardiography gating methods (p > 0.05 for all). Noticeably, there were no significant differences in strain and strain rate between RA and LA function using CMR-FT (p > 0.05 for all). RA strain and strain rate using CMR-FT had fair and good intra- and inter-observer reproducibility and had superior reproducibility compared to STE derived strain.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7089993
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70899932020-03-26 Right Atrial Deformation Using Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Myocardial Feature Tracking Compared with Two-Dimensional Speckle Tracking Echocardiography in Healthy Volunteers Truong, Vien T. Palmer, Cassady Young, Michael Wolking, Sarah Ngo, Tam N. M. Sheets, Brandy Hausfeld, Chelsey Ornella, Allison Taylor, Michael D. Zareba, Karolina M. Raman, Subha V. Mazur, Wojciech Sci Rep Article Speckle tracking echocardiography (STE), and more recently, cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial feature tracking (CMR-FT) provides insight into all phases of atrial function. The aim of our study was to compare all phases of RA strain using CMR-FT and STE and also assess the relationship between RA and LA strain. A total of 61 healthy volunteers with mean age of 45 ± 13 years had adequate tracking for analysis on CMR-FT and 2D-STE. Females had larger RA reservoir strain (39 ± 15% vs. 32 ± 13%, p = 0.046) and conduit strain (26 ± 12% vs. 20 ± 9%, p = 0.03) when compared to males, but was not the case with booster strain (14 ± 7% vs. 12 ± 6%, p = 0.45). In comparison with STE derived strain, the RA reservoir and conduit strain were not significantly different between CMR-FT and the three echocardiography gating methods (p > 0.05 for all). Noticeably, there were no significant differences in strain and strain rate between RA and LA function using CMR-FT (p > 0.05 for all). RA strain and strain rate using CMR-FT had fair and good intra- and inter-observer reproducibility and had superior reproducibility compared to STE derived strain. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-03-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7089993/ /pubmed/32251322 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-62105-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Truong, Vien T.
Palmer, Cassady
Young, Michael
Wolking, Sarah
Ngo, Tam N. M.
Sheets, Brandy
Hausfeld, Chelsey
Ornella, Allison
Taylor, Michael D.
Zareba, Karolina M.
Raman, Subha V.
Mazur, Wojciech
Right Atrial Deformation Using Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Myocardial Feature Tracking Compared with Two-Dimensional Speckle Tracking Echocardiography in Healthy Volunteers
title Right Atrial Deformation Using Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Myocardial Feature Tracking Compared with Two-Dimensional Speckle Tracking Echocardiography in Healthy Volunteers
title_full Right Atrial Deformation Using Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Myocardial Feature Tracking Compared with Two-Dimensional Speckle Tracking Echocardiography in Healthy Volunteers
title_fullStr Right Atrial Deformation Using Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Myocardial Feature Tracking Compared with Two-Dimensional Speckle Tracking Echocardiography in Healthy Volunteers
title_full_unstemmed Right Atrial Deformation Using Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Myocardial Feature Tracking Compared with Two-Dimensional Speckle Tracking Echocardiography in Healthy Volunteers
title_short Right Atrial Deformation Using Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Myocardial Feature Tracking Compared with Two-Dimensional Speckle Tracking Echocardiography in Healthy Volunteers
title_sort right atrial deformation using cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial feature tracking compared with two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography in healthy volunteers
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7089993/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32251322
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-62105-9
work_keys_str_mv AT truongvient rightatrialdeformationusingcardiovascularmagneticresonancemyocardialfeaturetrackingcomparedwithtwodimensionalspeckletrackingechocardiographyinhealthyvolunteers
AT palmercassady rightatrialdeformationusingcardiovascularmagneticresonancemyocardialfeaturetrackingcomparedwithtwodimensionalspeckletrackingechocardiographyinhealthyvolunteers
AT youngmichael rightatrialdeformationusingcardiovascularmagneticresonancemyocardialfeaturetrackingcomparedwithtwodimensionalspeckletrackingechocardiographyinhealthyvolunteers
AT wolkingsarah rightatrialdeformationusingcardiovascularmagneticresonancemyocardialfeaturetrackingcomparedwithtwodimensionalspeckletrackingechocardiographyinhealthyvolunteers
AT ngotamnm rightatrialdeformationusingcardiovascularmagneticresonancemyocardialfeaturetrackingcomparedwithtwodimensionalspeckletrackingechocardiographyinhealthyvolunteers
AT sheetsbrandy rightatrialdeformationusingcardiovascularmagneticresonancemyocardialfeaturetrackingcomparedwithtwodimensionalspeckletrackingechocardiographyinhealthyvolunteers
AT hausfeldchelsey rightatrialdeformationusingcardiovascularmagneticresonancemyocardialfeaturetrackingcomparedwithtwodimensionalspeckletrackingechocardiographyinhealthyvolunteers
AT ornellaallison rightatrialdeformationusingcardiovascularmagneticresonancemyocardialfeaturetrackingcomparedwithtwodimensionalspeckletrackingechocardiographyinhealthyvolunteers
AT taylormichaeld rightatrialdeformationusingcardiovascularmagneticresonancemyocardialfeaturetrackingcomparedwithtwodimensionalspeckletrackingechocardiographyinhealthyvolunteers
AT zarebakarolinam rightatrialdeformationusingcardiovascularmagneticresonancemyocardialfeaturetrackingcomparedwithtwodimensionalspeckletrackingechocardiographyinhealthyvolunteers
AT ramansubhav rightatrialdeformationusingcardiovascularmagneticresonancemyocardialfeaturetrackingcomparedwithtwodimensionalspeckletrackingechocardiographyinhealthyvolunteers
AT mazurwojciech rightatrialdeformationusingcardiovascularmagneticresonancemyocardialfeaturetrackingcomparedwithtwodimensionalspeckletrackingechocardiographyinhealthyvolunteers