Cargando…

Self-Reported vs Measured Physical Fitness in Older Women

PURPOSE: The main purpose of the study was to determine the level of correlation between self-reported and measured physical fitness. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we recruited 120 older women aged ≥60 years. Self-reported physical fitness was assessed on a scale from 1 to 10,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kasović, Mario, Štefan, Lovro, Zvonar, Martin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7090199/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32256057
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S240156
_version_ 1783509883425914880
author Kasović, Mario
Štefan, Lovro
Zvonar, Martin
author_facet Kasović, Mario
Štefan, Lovro
Zvonar, Martin
author_sort Kasović, Mario
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The main purpose of the study was to determine the level of correlation between self-reported and measured physical fitness. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we recruited 120 older women aged ≥60 years. Self-reported physical fitness was assessed on a scale from 1 to 10, where higher score indicated better physical fitness perception. Objective measure included seven physical fitness tests: 1) waist circumference, 2) chair stand in 30 sec, 3) arm curl in 30 sec, 4) 2-min step test, 5) chair sit-and-reach test, 6) back scratch test and 7) 8-feet up-and-go test. Correlation between the two measures was analyzed by using Spearman coefficient (p≤0.05). RESULTS: In the whole sample, self-reported physical fitness was associated with chair stand in 30 sec (r=0.39, p<0.001), arm curl in 30 sec (r=0.54, p<0.001), 2-min step test (r=0.43, p<0.001), chair sit-and-reach test (r=0.39, p<0.001), back scratch test (r=0.36, p<0.001) and 8-feet up-and-go test (r=−0.29, p<0.001). No significant correlation between self-reported physical fitness and waist circumference was found (r=0.03, p=0.786). Overall physical fitness (sum of all physical fitness z-scores) was strongly correlated with self-reported physical fitness (r=0.63, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: This study shows that self-reported measure of physical fitness is moderately correlated to objectively measured physical fitness in relatively healthy older women.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7090199
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70901992020-04-01 Self-Reported vs Measured Physical Fitness in Older Women Kasović, Mario Štefan, Lovro Zvonar, Martin Clin Interv Aging Original Research PURPOSE: The main purpose of the study was to determine the level of correlation between self-reported and measured physical fitness. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we recruited 120 older women aged ≥60 years. Self-reported physical fitness was assessed on a scale from 1 to 10, where higher score indicated better physical fitness perception. Objective measure included seven physical fitness tests: 1) waist circumference, 2) chair stand in 30 sec, 3) arm curl in 30 sec, 4) 2-min step test, 5) chair sit-and-reach test, 6) back scratch test and 7) 8-feet up-and-go test. Correlation between the two measures was analyzed by using Spearman coefficient (p≤0.05). RESULTS: In the whole sample, self-reported physical fitness was associated with chair stand in 30 sec (r=0.39, p<0.001), arm curl in 30 sec (r=0.54, p<0.001), 2-min step test (r=0.43, p<0.001), chair sit-and-reach test (r=0.39, p<0.001), back scratch test (r=0.36, p<0.001) and 8-feet up-and-go test (r=−0.29, p<0.001). No significant correlation between self-reported physical fitness and waist circumference was found (r=0.03, p=0.786). Overall physical fitness (sum of all physical fitness z-scores) was strongly correlated with self-reported physical fitness (r=0.63, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: This study shows that self-reported measure of physical fitness is moderately correlated to objectively measured physical fitness in relatively healthy older women. Dove 2020-03-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7090199/ /pubmed/32256057 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S240156 Text en © 2020 Kasović et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Kasović, Mario
Štefan, Lovro
Zvonar, Martin
Self-Reported vs Measured Physical Fitness in Older Women
title Self-Reported vs Measured Physical Fitness in Older Women
title_full Self-Reported vs Measured Physical Fitness in Older Women
title_fullStr Self-Reported vs Measured Physical Fitness in Older Women
title_full_unstemmed Self-Reported vs Measured Physical Fitness in Older Women
title_short Self-Reported vs Measured Physical Fitness in Older Women
title_sort self-reported vs measured physical fitness in older women
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7090199/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32256057
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S240156
work_keys_str_mv AT kasovicmario selfreportedvsmeasuredphysicalfitnessinolderwomen
AT stefanlovro selfreportedvsmeasuredphysicalfitnessinolderwomen
AT zvonarmartin selfreportedvsmeasuredphysicalfitnessinolderwomen