Cargando…
Mechanisms for the testing effect on patient-reported outcomes
The testing effect is when patient-reported outcomes (PRO) improve with repeated administration without intervention. The testing effect can confound interpretation of clinical trials using PROs as endpoints. This study investigated potential mechanisms. The parent study (n = 302) investigated a sel...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7090376/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32215338 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2020.100554 |
_version_ | 1783509920379830272 |
---|---|
author | Jones, Salene M.W. Shulman, Lisa J. Richards, Julie E. Ludman, Evette J. |
author_facet | Jones, Salene M.W. Shulman, Lisa J. Richards, Julie E. Ludman, Evette J. |
author_sort | Jones, Salene M.W. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The testing effect is when patient-reported outcomes (PRO) improve with repeated administration without intervention. The testing effect can confound interpretation of clinical trials using PROs as endpoints. This study investigated potential mechanisms. The parent study (n = 302) investigated a self-management intervention for depression. We qualitatively analyzed exit interview feedback from the 89 control group participants completing the last assessment. Participants reported several perceived benefits from control group participation including novel mechanisms (study participation was meaningful, emotional support, appreciating outreach), a possible negative testing effect and mechanisms previously identified (behavioral change). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7090376 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70903762020-03-25 Mechanisms for the testing effect on patient-reported outcomes Jones, Salene M.W. Shulman, Lisa J. Richards, Julie E. Ludman, Evette J. Contemp Clin Trials Commun Article The testing effect is when patient-reported outcomes (PRO) improve with repeated administration without intervention. The testing effect can confound interpretation of clinical trials using PROs as endpoints. This study investigated potential mechanisms. The parent study (n = 302) investigated a self-management intervention for depression. We qualitatively analyzed exit interview feedback from the 89 control group participants completing the last assessment. Participants reported several perceived benefits from control group participation including novel mechanisms (study participation was meaningful, emotional support, appreciating outreach), a possible negative testing effect and mechanisms previously identified (behavioral change). Elsevier 2020-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7090376/ /pubmed/32215338 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2020.100554 Text en © 2020 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Jones, Salene M.W. Shulman, Lisa J. Richards, Julie E. Ludman, Evette J. Mechanisms for the testing effect on patient-reported outcomes |
title | Mechanisms for the testing effect on patient-reported outcomes |
title_full | Mechanisms for the testing effect on patient-reported outcomes |
title_fullStr | Mechanisms for the testing effect on patient-reported outcomes |
title_full_unstemmed | Mechanisms for the testing effect on patient-reported outcomes |
title_short | Mechanisms for the testing effect on patient-reported outcomes |
title_sort | mechanisms for the testing effect on patient-reported outcomes |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7090376/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32215338 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2020.100554 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jonessalenemw mechanismsforthetestingeffectonpatientreportedoutcomes AT shulmanlisaj mechanismsforthetestingeffectonpatientreportedoutcomes AT richardsjuliee mechanismsforthetestingeffectonpatientreportedoutcomes AT ludmanevettej mechanismsforthetestingeffectonpatientreportedoutcomes |