Cargando…

Effectiveness of Conversational Agents (Virtual Assistants) in Health Care: Protocol for a Systematic Review

BACKGROUND: Conversational agents (also known as chatbots) have evolved in recent decades to become multimodal, multifunctional platforms with potential to automate a diverse range of health-related activities supporting the general public, patients, and physicians. Multiple studies have reported th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Cock, Caroline, Milne-Ives, Madison, van Velthoven, Michelle Helena, Alturkistani, Abrar, Lam, Ching, Meinert, Edward
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7091022/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32149717
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/16934
_version_ 1783509977703383040
author de Cock, Caroline
Milne-Ives, Madison
van Velthoven, Michelle Helena
Alturkistani, Abrar
Lam, Ching
Meinert, Edward
author_facet de Cock, Caroline
Milne-Ives, Madison
van Velthoven, Michelle Helena
Alturkistani, Abrar
Lam, Ching
Meinert, Edward
author_sort de Cock, Caroline
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Conversational agents (also known as chatbots) have evolved in recent decades to become multimodal, multifunctional platforms with potential to automate a diverse range of health-related activities supporting the general public, patients, and physicians. Multiple studies have reported the development of these agents, and recent systematic reviews have described the scope of use of conversational agents in health care. However, there is scarce research on the effectiveness of these systems; thus, their viability and applicability are unclear. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this systematic review is to assess the effectiveness of conversational agents in health care and to identify limitations, adverse events, and areas for future investigation of these agents. METHODS: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols will be used to structure this protocol. The focus of the systematic review is guided by a population, intervention, comparator, and outcome framework. A systematic search of the PubMed (Medline), EMBASE, CINAHL, and Web of Science databases will be conducted. Two authors will independently screen the titles and abstracts of the identified references and select studies according to the eligibility criteria. Any discrepancies will then be discussed and resolved. Two reviewers will independently extract and validate data from the included studies into a standardized form and conduct quality appraisal. RESULTS: As of January 2020, we have begun a preliminary literature search and piloting of the study selection process. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review aims to clarify the effectiveness, limitations, and future applications of conversational agents in health care. Our findings may be useful to inform the future development of conversational agents and promote the personalization of patient care. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/16934
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7091022
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70910222020-03-31 Effectiveness of Conversational Agents (Virtual Assistants) in Health Care: Protocol for a Systematic Review de Cock, Caroline Milne-Ives, Madison van Velthoven, Michelle Helena Alturkistani, Abrar Lam, Ching Meinert, Edward JMIR Res Protoc Protocol BACKGROUND: Conversational agents (also known as chatbots) have evolved in recent decades to become multimodal, multifunctional platforms with potential to automate a diverse range of health-related activities supporting the general public, patients, and physicians. Multiple studies have reported the development of these agents, and recent systematic reviews have described the scope of use of conversational agents in health care. However, there is scarce research on the effectiveness of these systems; thus, their viability and applicability are unclear. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this systematic review is to assess the effectiveness of conversational agents in health care and to identify limitations, adverse events, and areas for future investigation of these agents. METHODS: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols will be used to structure this protocol. The focus of the systematic review is guided by a population, intervention, comparator, and outcome framework. A systematic search of the PubMed (Medline), EMBASE, CINAHL, and Web of Science databases will be conducted. Two authors will independently screen the titles and abstracts of the identified references and select studies according to the eligibility criteria. Any discrepancies will then be discussed and resolved. Two reviewers will independently extract and validate data from the included studies into a standardized form and conduct quality appraisal. RESULTS: As of January 2020, we have begun a preliminary literature search and piloting of the study selection process. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review aims to clarify the effectiveness, limitations, and future applications of conversational agents in health care. Our findings may be useful to inform the future development of conversational agents and promote the personalization of patient care. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/16934 JMIR Publications 2020-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7091022/ /pubmed/32149717 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/16934 Text en ©Caroline de Cock, Madison Milne-Ives, Michelle Helena van Velthoven, Abrar Alturkistani, Ching Lam, Edward Meinert. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (http://www.researchprotocols.org), 09.03.2020. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Research Protocols, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.researchprotocols.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Protocol
de Cock, Caroline
Milne-Ives, Madison
van Velthoven, Michelle Helena
Alturkistani, Abrar
Lam, Ching
Meinert, Edward
Effectiveness of Conversational Agents (Virtual Assistants) in Health Care: Protocol for a Systematic Review
title Effectiveness of Conversational Agents (Virtual Assistants) in Health Care: Protocol for a Systematic Review
title_full Effectiveness of Conversational Agents (Virtual Assistants) in Health Care: Protocol for a Systematic Review
title_fullStr Effectiveness of Conversational Agents (Virtual Assistants) in Health Care: Protocol for a Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of Conversational Agents (Virtual Assistants) in Health Care: Protocol for a Systematic Review
title_short Effectiveness of Conversational Agents (Virtual Assistants) in Health Care: Protocol for a Systematic Review
title_sort effectiveness of conversational agents (virtual assistants) in health care: protocol for a systematic review
topic Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7091022/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32149717
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/16934
work_keys_str_mv AT decockcaroline effectivenessofconversationalagentsvirtualassistantsinhealthcareprotocolforasystematicreview
AT milneivesmadison effectivenessofconversationalagentsvirtualassistantsinhealthcareprotocolforasystematicreview
AT vanvelthovenmichellehelena effectivenessofconversationalagentsvirtualassistantsinhealthcareprotocolforasystematicreview
AT alturkistaniabrar effectivenessofconversationalagentsvirtualassistantsinhealthcareprotocolforasystematicreview
AT lamching effectivenessofconversationalagentsvirtualassistantsinhealthcareprotocolforasystematicreview
AT meinertedward effectivenessofconversationalagentsvirtualassistantsinhealthcareprotocolforasystematicreview