Cargando…

Survival of Respiratory Viruses on Fresh Produce

In addition to enteric viruses of fecal origin, emerging zoonotic viruses such as respiratory coronaviruses and influenza viruses may potentially be transmitted via contaminated foods. The goal of this study was to determine the recovery efficiencies and the survival of two respiratory viruses, name...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yépiz-Gómez, M. Susana, Gerba, Charles P., Bright, Kelly R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7091382/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23681671
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12560-013-9114-4
_version_ 1783510010655932416
author Yépiz-Gómez, M. Susana
Gerba, Charles P.
Bright, Kelly R.
author_facet Yépiz-Gómez, M. Susana
Gerba, Charles P.
Bright, Kelly R.
author_sort Yépiz-Gómez, M. Susana
collection PubMed
description In addition to enteric viruses of fecal origin, emerging zoonotic viruses such as respiratory coronaviruses and influenza viruses may potentially be transmitted via contaminated foods. The goal of this study was to determine the recovery efficiencies and the survival of two respiratory viruses, namely, adenovirus 2 (Ad2) and coronavirus 229E (CoV229E), on fresh produce in comparison to the enteric poliovirus 1 (PV1). Adenovirus was recovered with efficiencies of 56.5, 31.8, and 34.8 % from lettuce, strawberries, and raspberries, respectively. Coronavirus was recovered from lettuce with an efficiency of 19.6 % yet could not be recovered from strawberries. Poliovirus was recovered with efficiencies of 76.7 % from lettuce, but only 0.06 % from strawberries. For comparison purposes, the survival of Ad2, CoV229E, and PV1 was determined for periods up to 10 days on produce. The enteric PV1 survived better than both respiratory viruses on lettuce and strawberries, with only ≤1.03 log(10) reductions after 10 days of storage at 4 °C compared to CoV229E not being recovered after 4 days on lettuce and reductions of 1.97 log(10) and 2.38 log(10) of Ad2 on lettuce and strawberries, respectively, after 10 days. Nevertheless, these respiratory viruses were able to survive for at least several days on produce. There is therefore the potential for transfer to the hands and subsequently to the mucosa via rubbing the eyes or nose. In addition, some respiratory coronaviruses (e.g., severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus) and adenoviruses are also capable of replication in the gut and there is thus some potential for acquisition through the consumption of contaminated produce.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7091382
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70913822020-03-24 Survival of Respiratory Viruses on Fresh Produce Yépiz-Gómez, M. Susana Gerba, Charles P. Bright, Kelly R. Food Environ Virol Original Paper In addition to enteric viruses of fecal origin, emerging zoonotic viruses such as respiratory coronaviruses and influenza viruses may potentially be transmitted via contaminated foods. The goal of this study was to determine the recovery efficiencies and the survival of two respiratory viruses, namely, adenovirus 2 (Ad2) and coronavirus 229E (CoV229E), on fresh produce in comparison to the enteric poliovirus 1 (PV1). Adenovirus was recovered with efficiencies of 56.5, 31.8, and 34.8 % from lettuce, strawberries, and raspberries, respectively. Coronavirus was recovered from lettuce with an efficiency of 19.6 % yet could not be recovered from strawberries. Poliovirus was recovered with efficiencies of 76.7 % from lettuce, but only 0.06 % from strawberries. For comparison purposes, the survival of Ad2, CoV229E, and PV1 was determined for periods up to 10 days on produce. The enteric PV1 survived better than both respiratory viruses on lettuce and strawberries, with only ≤1.03 log(10) reductions after 10 days of storage at 4 °C compared to CoV229E not being recovered after 4 days on lettuce and reductions of 1.97 log(10) and 2.38 log(10) of Ad2 on lettuce and strawberries, respectively, after 10 days. Nevertheless, these respiratory viruses were able to survive for at least several days on produce. There is therefore the potential for transfer to the hands and subsequently to the mucosa via rubbing the eyes or nose. In addition, some respiratory coronaviruses (e.g., severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus) and adenoviruses are also capable of replication in the gut and there is thus some potential for acquisition through the consumption of contaminated produce. Springer US 2013-05-17 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC7091382/ /pubmed/23681671 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12560-013-9114-4 Text en © Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Yépiz-Gómez, M. Susana
Gerba, Charles P.
Bright, Kelly R.
Survival of Respiratory Viruses on Fresh Produce
title Survival of Respiratory Viruses on Fresh Produce
title_full Survival of Respiratory Viruses on Fresh Produce
title_fullStr Survival of Respiratory Viruses on Fresh Produce
title_full_unstemmed Survival of Respiratory Viruses on Fresh Produce
title_short Survival of Respiratory Viruses on Fresh Produce
title_sort survival of respiratory viruses on fresh produce
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7091382/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23681671
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12560-013-9114-4
work_keys_str_mv AT yepizgomezmsusana survivalofrespiratoryvirusesonfreshproduce
AT gerbacharlesp survivalofrespiratoryvirusesonfreshproduce
AT brightkellyr survivalofrespiratoryvirusesonfreshproduce