Cargando…

Statistical validity and reliability of the Persian version of the Western Ontario Meniscal Evaluation Tool (WOMET) according to the COSMIN checklist

BACKGROUND: The Western Ontario Meniscal Evaluation Tool (WOMET) is the only questionnaire available to assess quality of life in patients with isolated meniscal injuries. The aims of this study were to prepare the Persian version of the WOMET (PWOMET) and validate it in Iranian patients with isolat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ebrahimi, Naghmeh, Naghdi, Soofia, Ansari, Noureddin Nakhostin, Jalaie, Shohreh, Salsabili, Nasser
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7092415/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32293390
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-3171-2
_version_ 1783510093489242112
author Ebrahimi, Naghmeh
Naghdi, Soofia
Ansari, Noureddin Nakhostin
Jalaie, Shohreh
Salsabili, Nasser
author_facet Ebrahimi, Naghmeh
Naghdi, Soofia
Ansari, Noureddin Nakhostin
Jalaie, Shohreh
Salsabili, Nasser
author_sort Ebrahimi, Naghmeh
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Western Ontario Meniscal Evaluation Tool (WOMET) is the only questionnaire available to assess quality of life in patients with isolated meniscal injuries. The aims of this study were to prepare the Persian version of the WOMET (PWOMET) and validate it in Iranian patients with isolated meniscal tears. METHODS: In the first stage, the English version of WOMET was translated into Persian. Content validity, and qualitative and quantitative (impact score) face validity were tested by specialists and in a sample of 30 patients. In the second stage, PWOMET was assessed for the evaluation of psychometric properties in 100 patients with isolated meniscal injury and 50 healthy people based on the COSMIN checklist. Construct validity was tested based on structural validity (factor analysis) and hypothesis testing. Correlation with the total scores on the SF-36, IKDC and KOOS were used for concurrent criterion validity. Test-retest reliability and internal consistency were calculated using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Cronbach’s alpha, respectively. In addition the standard error of measurement (SEM) and smallest detectable change were calculated. Interpretability was investigated as the ceiling and floor effects and minimal important difference. RESULTS: The PWOMET had acceptable qualitative face validity and content validity. The impact score (quantitative face validity) was more than 1.5 for all items. For construct validity, structural validity (factor analysis) and hypothesis testing ability were confirmed. Correlations between the PWOMET total score and IKDC, SF-36, KOOS scores were 0.61, 0.54 and 0.63, respectively (p < 0.001), thus confirming concurrent criterion validity. The intraclass correlation coefficient, Cronbach’s alpha, SEM and smallest detectable change for the PWOMET were 0.73, 0.89, 9.43 and 26.13, respectively. The PWOMET had no ceiling or floor effects, and minimal important difference was 9.07. CONCLUSION: The PWOMET provides valid and reliable scores for assessment of the quality of life in patients with isolated meniscal injury.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7092415
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70924152020-03-24 Statistical validity and reliability of the Persian version of the Western Ontario Meniscal Evaluation Tool (WOMET) according to the COSMIN checklist Ebrahimi, Naghmeh Naghdi, Soofia Ansari, Noureddin Nakhostin Jalaie, Shohreh Salsabili, Nasser BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: The Western Ontario Meniscal Evaluation Tool (WOMET) is the only questionnaire available to assess quality of life in patients with isolated meniscal injuries. The aims of this study were to prepare the Persian version of the WOMET (PWOMET) and validate it in Iranian patients with isolated meniscal tears. METHODS: In the first stage, the English version of WOMET was translated into Persian. Content validity, and qualitative and quantitative (impact score) face validity were tested by specialists and in a sample of 30 patients. In the second stage, PWOMET was assessed for the evaluation of psychometric properties in 100 patients with isolated meniscal injury and 50 healthy people based on the COSMIN checklist. Construct validity was tested based on structural validity (factor analysis) and hypothesis testing. Correlation with the total scores on the SF-36, IKDC and KOOS were used for concurrent criterion validity. Test-retest reliability and internal consistency were calculated using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Cronbach’s alpha, respectively. In addition the standard error of measurement (SEM) and smallest detectable change were calculated. Interpretability was investigated as the ceiling and floor effects and minimal important difference. RESULTS: The PWOMET had acceptable qualitative face validity and content validity. The impact score (quantitative face validity) was more than 1.5 for all items. For construct validity, structural validity (factor analysis) and hypothesis testing ability were confirmed. Correlations between the PWOMET total score and IKDC, SF-36, KOOS scores were 0.61, 0.54 and 0.63, respectively (p < 0.001), thus confirming concurrent criterion validity. The intraclass correlation coefficient, Cronbach’s alpha, SEM and smallest detectable change for the PWOMET were 0.73, 0.89, 9.43 and 26.13, respectively. The PWOMET had no ceiling or floor effects, and minimal important difference was 9.07. CONCLUSION: The PWOMET provides valid and reliable scores for assessment of the quality of life in patients with isolated meniscal injury. BioMed Central 2020-03-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7092415/ /pubmed/32293390 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-3171-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ebrahimi, Naghmeh
Naghdi, Soofia
Ansari, Noureddin Nakhostin
Jalaie, Shohreh
Salsabili, Nasser
Statistical validity and reliability of the Persian version of the Western Ontario Meniscal Evaluation Tool (WOMET) according to the COSMIN checklist
title Statistical validity and reliability of the Persian version of the Western Ontario Meniscal Evaluation Tool (WOMET) according to the COSMIN checklist
title_full Statistical validity and reliability of the Persian version of the Western Ontario Meniscal Evaluation Tool (WOMET) according to the COSMIN checklist
title_fullStr Statistical validity and reliability of the Persian version of the Western Ontario Meniscal Evaluation Tool (WOMET) according to the COSMIN checklist
title_full_unstemmed Statistical validity and reliability of the Persian version of the Western Ontario Meniscal Evaluation Tool (WOMET) according to the COSMIN checklist
title_short Statistical validity and reliability of the Persian version of the Western Ontario Meniscal Evaluation Tool (WOMET) according to the COSMIN checklist
title_sort statistical validity and reliability of the persian version of the western ontario meniscal evaluation tool (womet) according to the cosmin checklist
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7092415/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32293390
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-3171-2
work_keys_str_mv AT ebrahiminaghmeh statisticalvalidityandreliabilityofthepersianversionofthewesternontariomeniscalevaluationtoolwometaccordingtothecosminchecklist
AT naghdisoofia statisticalvalidityandreliabilityofthepersianversionofthewesternontariomeniscalevaluationtoolwometaccordingtothecosminchecklist
AT ansarinoureddinnakhostin statisticalvalidityandreliabilityofthepersianversionofthewesternontariomeniscalevaluationtoolwometaccordingtothecosminchecklist
AT jalaieshohreh statisticalvalidityandreliabilityofthepersianversionofthewesternontariomeniscalevaluationtoolwometaccordingtothecosminchecklist
AT salsabilinasser statisticalvalidityandreliabilityofthepersianversionofthewesternontariomeniscalevaluationtoolwometaccordingtothecosminchecklist