Cargando…
Patency of conduits in patients who received internal mammary artery, radial artery and saphenous vein grafts
BACKGROUND: Where each patient has all three conduits of internal mammary artery (IMA), saphenous vein graft (SVG) and radial artery (RA), most confounders affecting comparison between conduits can be mitigated. Additionally, since SVG progressively fails over time, restricting patient angiography t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7092416/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32204693 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-020-01433-0 |
_version_ | 1783510093733560320 |
---|---|
author | Royse, Alistair Pamment, William Pawanis, Zulfayandi Clarke-Errey, Sandy Eccleston, David Ajani, Andrew Wilson, William Canty, David Royse, Colin |
author_facet | Royse, Alistair Pamment, William Pawanis, Zulfayandi Clarke-Errey, Sandy Eccleston, David Ajani, Andrew Wilson, William Canty, David Royse, Colin |
author_sort | Royse, Alistair |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Where each patient has all three conduits of internal mammary artery (IMA), saphenous vein graft (SVG) and radial artery (RA), most confounders affecting comparison between conduits can be mitigated. Additionally, since SVG progressively fails over time, restricting patient angiography to the late period only can mitigate against early SVG patency that may have occluded in the late period. METHODS: Research protocol driven conventional angiography was performed for patients with at least one of each conduit of IMA, RA and SVG and a minimum of 7 years postoperative. The primary analysis was perfect patency and secondary analysis was overall patency including angiographic evidence of conduit lumen irregularity from conduit atheroma. Multivariable generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) was used. Patency excluded occluded or “string sign” conduits. Perfect patency was present in patent grafts if there was no lumen irregularity. RESULTS: Fifty patients underwent coronary angiography at overall duration postoperative 13.1 ± 2.9, and age 74.3 ± 7.0 years. Of 196 anastomoses, IMA 62, RA 77 and SVG 57. Most IMA were to the left anterior descending territory and most RA and SVG were to the circumflex and right coronary territories. Perfect patency RA 92.2% was not different to IMA 96.8%, P = 0.309; and both were significantly better than SVG 17.5%, P < 0.001. Patency RA 93.5% was also not different to IMA 96.8%, P = 0.169, and both arterial conduits were significantly higher than SVG 82.5%, P = 0.029. Grafting according to coronary territory was not significant for perfect patency, P = 0.997 and patency P = 0.289. Coronary stenosis predicted perfect patency for RA only, P = 0.030 and for patency, RA, P = 0.007, and SVG, P = 0.032. When both arterial conduits were combined, perfect patency, P < 0.001, and patency, P = 0.017, were superior to SVG. CONCLUSIONS: All but one patent internal mammary artery or radial artery grafts had perfect patency and had superior perfect patency and overall patency compared to saphenous vein grafts. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7092416 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70924162020-03-24 Patency of conduits in patients who received internal mammary artery, radial artery and saphenous vein grafts Royse, Alistair Pamment, William Pawanis, Zulfayandi Clarke-Errey, Sandy Eccleston, David Ajani, Andrew Wilson, William Canty, David Royse, Colin BMC Cardiovasc Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Where each patient has all three conduits of internal mammary artery (IMA), saphenous vein graft (SVG) and radial artery (RA), most confounders affecting comparison between conduits can be mitigated. Additionally, since SVG progressively fails over time, restricting patient angiography to the late period only can mitigate against early SVG patency that may have occluded in the late period. METHODS: Research protocol driven conventional angiography was performed for patients with at least one of each conduit of IMA, RA and SVG and a minimum of 7 years postoperative. The primary analysis was perfect patency and secondary analysis was overall patency including angiographic evidence of conduit lumen irregularity from conduit atheroma. Multivariable generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) was used. Patency excluded occluded or “string sign” conduits. Perfect patency was present in patent grafts if there was no lumen irregularity. RESULTS: Fifty patients underwent coronary angiography at overall duration postoperative 13.1 ± 2.9, and age 74.3 ± 7.0 years. Of 196 anastomoses, IMA 62, RA 77 and SVG 57. Most IMA were to the left anterior descending territory and most RA and SVG were to the circumflex and right coronary territories. Perfect patency RA 92.2% was not different to IMA 96.8%, P = 0.309; and both were significantly better than SVG 17.5%, P < 0.001. Patency RA 93.5% was also not different to IMA 96.8%, P = 0.169, and both arterial conduits were significantly higher than SVG 82.5%, P = 0.029. Grafting according to coronary territory was not significant for perfect patency, P = 0.997 and patency P = 0.289. Coronary stenosis predicted perfect patency for RA only, P = 0.030 and for patency, RA, P = 0.007, and SVG, P = 0.032. When both arterial conduits were combined, perfect patency, P < 0.001, and patency, P = 0.017, were superior to SVG. CONCLUSIONS: All but one patent internal mammary artery or radial artery grafts had perfect patency and had superior perfect patency and overall patency compared to saphenous vein grafts. BioMed Central 2020-03-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7092416/ /pubmed/32204693 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-020-01433-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Royse, Alistair Pamment, William Pawanis, Zulfayandi Clarke-Errey, Sandy Eccleston, David Ajani, Andrew Wilson, William Canty, David Royse, Colin Patency of conduits in patients who received internal mammary artery, radial artery and saphenous vein grafts |
title | Patency of conduits in patients who received internal mammary artery, radial artery and saphenous vein grafts |
title_full | Patency of conduits in patients who received internal mammary artery, radial artery and saphenous vein grafts |
title_fullStr | Patency of conduits in patients who received internal mammary artery, radial artery and saphenous vein grafts |
title_full_unstemmed | Patency of conduits in patients who received internal mammary artery, radial artery and saphenous vein grafts |
title_short | Patency of conduits in patients who received internal mammary artery, radial artery and saphenous vein grafts |
title_sort | patency of conduits in patients who received internal mammary artery, radial artery and saphenous vein grafts |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7092416/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32204693 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-020-01433-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT roysealistair patencyofconduitsinpatientswhoreceivedinternalmammaryarteryradialarteryandsaphenousveingrafts AT pammentwilliam patencyofconduitsinpatientswhoreceivedinternalmammaryarteryradialarteryandsaphenousveingrafts AT pawaniszulfayandi patencyofconduitsinpatientswhoreceivedinternalmammaryarteryradialarteryandsaphenousveingrafts AT clarkeerreysandy patencyofconduitsinpatientswhoreceivedinternalmammaryarteryradialarteryandsaphenousveingrafts AT ecclestondavid patencyofconduitsinpatientswhoreceivedinternalmammaryarteryradialarteryandsaphenousveingrafts AT ajaniandrew patencyofconduitsinpatientswhoreceivedinternalmammaryarteryradialarteryandsaphenousveingrafts AT wilsonwilliam patencyofconduitsinpatientswhoreceivedinternalmammaryarteryradialarteryandsaphenousveingrafts AT cantydavid patencyofconduitsinpatientswhoreceivedinternalmammaryarteryradialarteryandsaphenousveingrafts AT roysecolin patencyofconduitsinpatientswhoreceivedinternalmammaryarteryradialarteryandsaphenousveingrafts |