Cargando…

Patency of conduits in patients who received internal mammary artery, radial artery and saphenous vein grafts

BACKGROUND: Where each patient has all three conduits of internal mammary artery (IMA), saphenous vein graft (SVG) and radial artery (RA), most confounders affecting comparison between conduits can be mitigated. Additionally, since SVG progressively fails over time, restricting patient angiography t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Royse, Alistair, Pamment, William, Pawanis, Zulfayandi, Clarke-Errey, Sandy, Eccleston, David, Ajani, Andrew, Wilson, William, Canty, David, Royse, Colin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7092416/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32204693
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-020-01433-0
_version_ 1783510093733560320
author Royse, Alistair
Pamment, William
Pawanis, Zulfayandi
Clarke-Errey, Sandy
Eccleston, David
Ajani, Andrew
Wilson, William
Canty, David
Royse, Colin
author_facet Royse, Alistair
Pamment, William
Pawanis, Zulfayandi
Clarke-Errey, Sandy
Eccleston, David
Ajani, Andrew
Wilson, William
Canty, David
Royse, Colin
author_sort Royse, Alistair
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Where each patient has all three conduits of internal mammary artery (IMA), saphenous vein graft (SVG) and radial artery (RA), most confounders affecting comparison between conduits can be mitigated. Additionally, since SVG progressively fails over time, restricting patient angiography to the late period only can mitigate against early SVG patency that may have occluded in the late period. METHODS: Research protocol driven conventional angiography was performed for patients with at least one of each conduit of IMA, RA and SVG and a minimum of 7 years postoperative. The primary analysis was perfect patency and secondary analysis was overall patency including angiographic evidence of conduit lumen irregularity from conduit atheroma. Multivariable generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) was used. Patency excluded occluded or “string sign” conduits. Perfect patency was present in patent grafts if there was no lumen irregularity. RESULTS: Fifty patients underwent coronary angiography at overall duration postoperative 13.1 ± 2.9, and age 74.3 ± 7.0 years. Of 196 anastomoses, IMA 62, RA 77 and SVG 57. Most IMA were to the left anterior descending territory and most RA and SVG were to the circumflex and right coronary territories. Perfect patency RA 92.2% was not different to IMA 96.8%, P = 0.309; and both were significantly better than SVG 17.5%, P < 0.001. Patency RA 93.5% was also not different to IMA 96.8%, P = 0.169, and both arterial conduits were significantly higher than SVG 82.5%, P = 0.029. Grafting according to coronary territory was not significant for perfect patency, P = 0.997 and patency P = 0.289. Coronary stenosis predicted perfect patency for RA only, P = 0.030 and for patency, RA, P = 0.007, and SVG, P = 0.032. When both arterial conduits were combined, perfect patency, P < 0.001, and patency, P = 0.017, were superior to SVG. CONCLUSIONS: All but one patent internal mammary artery or radial artery grafts had perfect patency and had superior perfect patency and overall patency compared to saphenous vein grafts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7092416
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70924162020-03-24 Patency of conduits in patients who received internal mammary artery, radial artery and saphenous vein grafts Royse, Alistair Pamment, William Pawanis, Zulfayandi Clarke-Errey, Sandy Eccleston, David Ajani, Andrew Wilson, William Canty, David Royse, Colin BMC Cardiovasc Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Where each patient has all three conduits of internal mammary artery (IMA), saphenous vein graft (SVG) and radial artery (RA), most confounders affecting comparison between conduits can be mitigated. Additionally, since SVG progressively fails over time, restricting patient angiography to the late period only can mitigate against early SVG patency that may have occluded in the late period. METHODS: Research protocol driven conventional angiography was performed for patients with at least one of each conduit of IMA, RA and SVG and a minimum of 7 years postoperative. The primary analysis was perfect patency and secondary analysis was overall patency including angiographic evidence of conduit lumen irregularity from conduit atheroma. Multivariable generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) was used. Patency excluded occluded or “string sign” conduits. Perfect patency was present in patent grafts if there was no lumen irregularity. RESULTS: Fifty patients underwent coronary angiography at overall duration postoperative 13.1 ± 2.9, and age 74.3 ± 7.0 years. Of 196 anastomoses, IMA 62, RA 77 and SVG 57. Most IMA were to the left anterior descending territory and most RA and SVG were to the circumflex and right coronary territories. Perfect patency RA 92.2% was not different to IMA 96.8%, P = 0.309; and both were significantly better than SVG 17.5%, P < 0.001. Patency RA 93.5% was also not different to IMA 96.8%, P = 0.169, and both arterial conduits were significantly higher than SVG 82.5%, P = 0.029. Grafting according to coronary territory was not significant for perfect patency, P = 0.997 and patency P = 0.289. Coronary stenosis predicted perfect patency for RA only, P = 0.030 and for patency, RA, P = 0.007, and SVG, P = 0.032. When both arterial conduits were combined, perfect patency, P < 0.001, and patency, P = 0.017, were superior to SVG. CONCLUSIONS: All but one patent internal mammary artery or radial artery grafts had perfect patency and had superior perfect patency and overall patency compared to saphenous vein grafts. BioMed Central 2020-03-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7092416/ /pubmed/32204693 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-020-01433-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Royse, Alistair
Pamment, William
Pawanis, Zulfayandi
Clarke-Errey, Sandy
Eccleston, David
Ajani, Andrew
Wilson, William
Canty, David
Royse, Colin
Patency of conduits in patients who received internal mammary artery, radial artery and saphenous vein grafts
title Patency of conduits in patients who received internal mammary artery, radial artery and saphenous vein grafts
title_full Patency of conduits in patients who received internal mammary artery, radial artery and saphenous vein grafts
title_fullStr Patency of conduits in patients who received internal mammary artery, radial artery and saphenous vein grafts
title_full_unstemmed Patency of conduits in patients who received internal mammary artery, radial artery and saphenous vein grafts
title_short Patency of conduits in patients who received internal mammary artery, radial artery and saphenous vein grafts
title_sort patency of conduits in patients who received internal mammary artery, radial artery and saphenous vein grafts
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7092416/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32204693
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-020-01433-0
work_keys_str_mv AT roysealistair patencyofconduitsinpatientswhoreceivedinternalmammaryarteryradialarteryandsaphenousveingrafts
AT pammentwilliam patencyofconduitsinpatientswhoreceivedinternalmammaryarteryradialarteryandsaphenousveingrafts
AT pawaniszulfayandi patencyofconduitsinpatientswhoreceivedinternalmammaryarteryradialarteryandsaphenousveingrafts
AT clarkeerreysandy patencyofconduitsinpatientswhoreceivedinternalmammaryarteryradialarteryandsaphenousveingrafts
AT ecclestondavid patencyofconduitsinpatientswhoreceivedinternalmammaryarteryradialarteryandsaphenousveingrafts
AT ajaniandrew patencyofconduitsinpatientswhoreceivedinternalmammaryarteryradialarteryandsaphenousveingrafts
AT wilsonwilliam patencyofconduitsinpatientswhoreceivedinternalmammaryarteryradialarteryandsaphenousveingrafts
AT cantydavid patencyofconduitsinpatientswhoreceivedinternalmammaryarteryradialarteryandsaphenousveingrafts
AT roysecolin patencyofconduitsinpatientswhoreceivedinternalmammaryarteryradialarteryandsaphenousveingrafts