Cargando…

Minimally invasive surgical treatment of minimally displaced acetabular fractures does not improve pain, mobility or quality of life compared to conservative treatment: a matched-pair analysis of 50 patients

BACKGROUND: Currently available procedures for the treatment of minimally displaced acetabular fractures include conservative treatment and minimally invasive percutaneous screw fixation. Screw fixation of acetabular fractures allows patients’ early full-weight bearing due to improved biomechanic st...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Swartman, Benedict, Pelzer, Johanna, Vetter, Sven Yves, Beisemann, Nils, Schnetzke, Marc, Keil, Holger, Gruetzner, Paul Alfred, Franke, Jochen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7092457/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32293501
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-020-01611-y
_version_ 1783510103421353984
author Swartman, Benedict
Pelzer, Johanna
Vetter, Sven Yves
Beisemann, Nils
Schnetzke, Marc
Keil, Holger
Gruetzner, Paul Alfred
Franke, Jochen
author_facet Swartman, Benedict
Pelzer, Johanna
Vetter, Sven Yves
Beisemann, Nils
Schnetzke, Marc
Keil, Holger
Gruetzner, Paul Alfred
Franke, Jochen
author_sort Swartman, Benedict
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Currently available procedures for the treatment of minimally displaced acetabular fractures include conservative treatment and minimally invasive percutaneous screw fixation. Screw fixation of acetabular fractures allows patients’ early full-weight bearing due to improved biomechanic stability. Can the range of motion, pain and mobility and quality of life in patients with acetabular fractures be improved by minimally invasive screw fixation, compared to conservative treatment in the long term? METHODS: Patients treated for a minimally displaced acetabular fracture, either conservatively or by closed reduction percutaneous screw fixation, in the period from 2001 to 2013 were included in this retrospective study. Minimal displacement was considered to be less than 5 mm. As well as the collection and analysis of baseline data, Harris Hip Score, Merle d’Aubigné score and Short Form 12 (SF-12) questionnaire data were recorded in the context of a clinical study. To better account for confounding factors, patients of each group were matched. The matched-pair criteria included age, BMI, Letournel fracture classification and the presence of associated injuries. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients from each group were matched. On the Harris Hip Score, conservatively treated patients obtained 96 points (52–100, SD 17) vs. 89 points (45–100, SD 17, p = 0.624). On the Merle d’Aubigné score, conservatively treated patients obtained 17 points (10–18, SD 2) vs. 17 points (11–18, SD 2, p = 0.342). Patients with acetabular fractures treated by minimally invasive screw fixation did not result in improved quality of life, measured by SF-12 questionnaire, compared to conservatively treated patients (PCS 47, SD 9 vs. 44, SD 10; p = 0.294 and MCS 51, SD 7 vs. 53, SD 7; p = 0.795). CONCLUSIONS: The clinical results of the two groups revealed no statistically significant differences. From the data, it cannot be deduced that minimally invasive surgical therapy is superior to conservative treatment of minimally displaced acetabular fractures. Prospective randomised studies are recommended to allow reliable evaluation of both treatment options. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Retrospectively registered
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7092457
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70924572020-03-24 Minimally invasive surgical treatment of minimally displaced acetabular fractures does not improve pain, mobility or quality of life compared to conservative treatment: a matched-pair analysis of 50 patients Swartman, Benedict Pelzer, Johanna Vetter, Sven Yves Beisemann, Nils Schnetzke, Marc Keil, Holger Gruetzner, Paul Alfred Franke, Jochen J Orthop Surg Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Currently available procedures for the treatment of minimally displaced acetabular fractures include conservative treatment and minimally invasive percutaneous screw fixation. Screw fixation of acetabular fractures allows patients’ early full-weight bearing due to improved biomechanic stability. Can the range of motion, pain and mobility and quality of life in patients with acetabular fractures be improved by minimally invasive screw fixation, compared to conservative treatment in the long term? METHODS: Patients treated for a minimally displaced acetabular fracture, either conservatively or by closed reduction percutaneous screw fixation, in the period from 2001 to 2013 were included in this retrospective study. Minimal displacement was considered to be less than 5 mm. As well as the collection and analysis of baseline data, Harris Hip Score, Merle d’Aubigné score and Short Form 12 (SF-12) questionnaire data were recorded in the context of a clinical study. To better account for confounding factors, patients of each group were matched. The matched-pair criteria included age, BMI, Letournel fracture classification and the presence of associated injuries. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients from each group were matched. On the Harris Hip Score, conservatively treated patients obtained 96 points (52–100, SD 17) vs. 89 points (45–100, SD 17, p = 0.624). On the Merle d’Aubigné score, conservatively treated patients obtained 17 points (10–18, SD 2) vs. 17 points (11–18, SD 2, p = 0.342). Patients with acetabular fractures treated by minimally invasive screw fixation did not result in improved quality of life, measured by SF-12 questionnaire, compared to conservatively treated patients (PCS 47, SD 9 vs. 44, SD 10; p = 0.294 and MCS 51, SD 7 vs. 53, SD 7; p = 0.795). CONCLUSIONS: The clinical results of the two groups revealed no statistically significant differences. From the data, it cannot be deduced that minimally invasive surgical therapy is superior to conservative treatment of minimally displaced acetabular fractures. Prospective randomised studies are recommended to allow reliable evaluation of both treatment options. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Retrospectively registered BioMed Central 2020-03-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7092457/ /pubmed/32293501 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-020-01611-y Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Swartman, Benedict
Pelzer, Johanna
Vetter, Sven Yves
Beisemann, Nils
Schnetzke, Marc
Keil, Holger
Gruetzner, Paul Alfred
Franke, Jochen
Minimally invasive surgical treatment of minimally displaced acetabular fractures does not improve pain, mobility or quality of life compared to conservative treatment: a matched-pair analysis of 50 patients
title Minimally invasive surgical treatment of minimally displaced acetabular fractures does not improve pain, mobility or quality of life compared to conservative treatment: a matched-pair analysis of 50 patients
title_full Minimally invasive surgical treatment of minimally displaced acetabular fractures does not improve pain, mobility or quality of life compared to conservative treatment: a matched-pair analysis of 50 patients
title_fullStr Minimally invasive surgical treatment of minimally displaced acetabular fractures does not improve pain, mobility or quality of life compared to conservative treatment: a matched-pair analysis of 50 patients
title_full_unstemmed Minimally invasive surgical treatment of minimally displaced acetabular fractures does not improve pain, mobility or quality of life compared to conservative treatment: a matched-pair analysis of 50 patients
title_short Minimally invasive surgical treatment of minimally displaced acetabular fractures does not improve pain, mobility or quality of life compared to conservative treatment: a matched-pair analysis of 50 patients
title_sort minimally invasive surgical treatment of minimally displaced acetabular fractures does not improve pain, mobility or quality of life compared to conservative treatment: a matched-pair analysis of 50 patients
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7092457/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32293501
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-020-01611-y
work_keys_str_mv AT swartmanbenedict minimallyinvasivesurgicaltreatmentofminimallydisplacedacetabularfracturesdoesnotimprovepainmobilityorqualityoflifecomparedtoconservativetreatmentamatchedpairanalysisof50patients
AT pelzerjohanna minimallyinvasivesurgicaltreatmentofminimallydisplacedacetabularfracturesdoesnotimprovepainmobilityorqualityoflifecomparedtoconservativetreatmentamatchedpairanalysisof50patients
AT vettersvenyves minimallyinvasivesurgicaltreatmentofminimallydisplacedacetabularfracturesdoesnotimprovepainmobilityorqualityoflifecomparedtoconservativetreatmentamatchedpairanalysisof50patients
AT beisemannnils minimallyinvasivesurgicaltreatmentofminimallydisplacedacetabularfracturesdoesnotimprovepainmobilityorqualityoflifecomparedtoconservativetreatmentamatchedpairanalysisof50patients
AT schnetzkemarc minimallyinvasivesurgicaltreatmentofminimallydisplacedacetabularfracturesdoesnotimprovepainmobilityorqualityoflifecomparedtoconservativetreatmentamatchedpairanalysisof50patients
AT keilholger minimallyinvasivesurgicaltreatmentofminimallydisplacedacetabularfracturesdoesnotimprovepainmobilityorqualityoflifecomparedtoconservativetreatmentamatchedpairanalysisof50patients
AT gruetznerpaulalfred minimallyinvasivesurgicaltreatmentofminimallydisplacedacetabularfracturesdoesnotimprovepainmobilityorqualityoflifecomparedtoconservativetreatmentamatchedpairanalysisof50patients
AT frankejochen minimallyinvasivesurgicaltreatmentofminimallydisplacedacetabularfracturesdoesnotimprovepainmobilityorqualityoflifecomparedtoconservativetreatmentamatchedpairanalysisof50patients