Cargando…

1.5 T MR-guided and daily adapted SBRT for prostate cancer: feasibility, preliminary clinical tolerability, quality of life and patient-reported outcomes during treatment

BACKGROUND: Unity Elekta is a unique magnetic resonance (MR)-linac that conjugates a 1.5 Tesla MR unit with a 7 MV flattening filter free accelerator.A prospective observational study for the clinical use of Elekta Unity is currently ongoing in our department. Herein, we present our preliminary repo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alongi, Filippo, Rigo, Michele, Figlia, Vanessa, Cuccia, Francesco, Giaj-Levra, Niccolò, Nicosia, Luca, Ricchetti, Francesco, Sicignano, Gianluisa, De Simone, Antonio, Naccarato, Stefania, Ruggieri, Ruggero, Mazzola, Rosario
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7092497/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32248826
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-020-01510-w
_version_ 1783510112388775936
author Alongi, Filippo
Rigo, Michele
Figlia, Vanessa
Cuccia, Francesco
Giaj-Levra, Niccolò
Nicosia, Luca
Ricchetti, Francesco
Sicignano, Gianluisa
De Simone, Antonio
Naccarato, Stefania
Ruggieri, Ruggero
Mazzola, Rosario
author_facet Alongi, Filippo
Rigo, Michele
Figlia, Vanessa
Cuccia, Francesco
Giaj-Levra, Niccolò
Nicosia, Luca
Ricchetti, Francesco
Sicignano, Gianluisa
De Simone, Antonio
Naccarato, Stefania
Ruggieri, Ruggero
Mazzola, Rosario
author_sort Alongi, Filippo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Unity Elekta is a unique magnetic resonance (MR)-linac that conjugates a 1.5 Tesla MR unit with a 7 MV flattening filter free accelerator.A prospective observational study for the clinical use of Elekta Unity is currently ongoing in our department. Herein, we present our preliminary report on the feasibility, quality of life, and patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) for localized prostate cancer (PC) treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). METHODS: The SBRT protocol consisted of a 35 Gy schedule delivered in 5 fractions within 2 weeks. Toxicity and quality of life (QoL) were assessed at baseline and after treatment using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0, International Prostatic Symptoms Score (IPSS), ICIQ-SF, IIEF-5, and EORTC-QLQ-C30 and PR-25 questionnaires. RESULTS: Between October 2019 and January 2020, 25 patients with localized PC were recruited. The median age was 68 years (range, 54–82); 4 were low risk, 11 favorable intermediate risk (IR) and 10 unfavorable IR. Median iPSA was 6.8 ng/ml (range, 1–19), and 9 of these patients (36%) received concurrent androgen deprivation therapy. Median prostate volume was 36 cc (range, 20–61); median baseline IPSS was 5 (range, 0–10). Median time for fraction was 53 min (range, 34–86); adaptive strategy with daily critical structure and target re-contouring and daily replanning (adapt to shape) was performed in all cases. No grade ≥ 3 adverse event was observed, three patients (12%) reported grade 2 acute genitourinary toxicity (urinary frequency, urinary tract pain and urinary retention), while only one patient reported mild rectal pain. No relevant deteriorations were reported in PROMs. CONCLUSION: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first experience reporting feasibility, clinician-reported outcome measurements, and PROMs for 1.5 T MR-guided adaptive SBRT for localized prostate cancer. The preliminary data collected here report optimal safety and excellent tolerability, as also confirmed by PROMs questionnaires. Moreover, the data on technical feasibility and timing of online daily adapted planning and delivery are promising. More mature data are warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Date of approval April 2019 and numbered MRI/LINAC n°23,748.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7092497
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70924972020-03-24 1.5 T MR-guided and daily adapted SBRT for prostate cancer: feasibility, preliminary clinical tolerability, quality of life and patient-reported outcomes during treatment Alongi, Filippo Rigo, Michele Figlia, Vanessa Cuccia, Francesco Giaj-Levra, Niccolò Nicosia, Luca Ricchetti, Francesco Sicignano, Gianluisa De Simone, Antonio Naccarato, Stefania Ruggieri, Ruggero Mazzola, Rosario Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND: Unity Elekta is a unique magnetic resonance (MR)-linac that conjugates a 1.5 Tesla MR unit with a 7 MV flattening filter free accelerator.A prospective observational study for the clinical use of Elekta Unity is currently ongoing in our department. Herein, we present our preliminary report on the feasibility, quality of life, and patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) for localized prostate cancer (PC) treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). METHODS: The SBRT protocol consisted of a 35 Gy schedule delivered in 5 fractions within 2 weeks. Toxicity and quality of life (QoL) were assessed at baseline and after treatment using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0, International Prostatic Symptoms Score (IPSS), ICIQ-SF, IIEF-5, and EORTC-QLQ-C30 and PR-25 questionnaires. RESULTS: Between October 2019 and January 2020, 25 patients with localized PC were recruited. The median age was 68 years (range, 54–82); 4 were low risk, 11 favorable intermediate risk (IR) and 10 unfavorable IR. Median iPSA was 6.8 ng/ml (range, 1–19), and 9 of these patients (36%) received concurrent androgen deprivation therapy. Median prostate volume was 36 cc (range, 20–61); median baseline IPSS was 5 (range, 0–10). Median time for fraction was 53 min (range, 34–86); adaptive strategy with daily critical structure and target re-contouring and daily replanning (adapt to shape) was performed in all cases. No grade ≥ 3 adverse event was observed, three patients (12%) reported grade 2 acute genitourinary toxicity (urinary frequency, urinary tract pain and urinary retention), while only one patient reported mild rectal pain. No relevant deteriorations were reported in PROMs. CONCLUSION: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first experience reporting feasibility, clinician-reported outcome measurements, and PROMs for 1.5 T MR-guided adaptive SBRT for localized prostate cancer. The preliminary data collected here report optimal safety and excellent tolerability, as also confirmed by PROMs questionnaires. Moreover, the data on technical feasibility and timing of online daily adapted planning and delivery are promising. More mature data are warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Date of approval April 2019 and numbered MRI/LINAC n°23,748. BioMed Central 2020-03-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7092497/ /pubmed/32248826 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-020-01510-w Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Alongi, Filippo
Rigo, Michele
Figlia, Vanessa
Cuccia, Francesco
Giaj-Levra, Niccolò
Nicosia, Luca
Ricchetti, Francesco
Sicignano, Gianluisa
De Simone, Antonio
Naccarato, Stefania
Ruggieri, Ruggero
Mazzola, Rosario
1.5 T MR-guided and daily adapted SBRT for prostate cancer: feasibility, preliminary clinical tolerability, quality of life and patient-reported outcomes during treatment
title 1.5 T MR-guided and daily adapted SBRT for prostate cancer: feasibility, preliminary clinical tolerability, quality of life and patient-reported outcomes during treatment
title_full 1.5 T MR-guided and daily adapted SBRT for prostate cancer: feasibility, preliminary clinical tolerability, quality of life and patient-reported outcomes during treatment
title_fullStr 1.5 T MR-guided and daily adapted SBRT for prostate cancer: feasibility, preliminary clinical tolerability, quality of life and patient-reported outcomes during treatment
title_full_unstemmed 1.5 T MR-guided and daily adapted SBRT for prostate cancer: feasibility, preliminary clinical tolerability, quality of life and patient-reported outcomes during treatment
title_short 1.5 T MR-guided and daily adapted SBRT for prostate cancer: feasibility, preliminary clinical tolerability, quality of life and patient-reported outcomes during treatment
title_sort 1.5 t mr-guided and daily adapted sbrt for prostate cancer: feasibility, preliminary clinical tolerability, quality of life and patient-reported outcomes during treatment
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7092497/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32248826
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-020-01510-w
work_keys_str_mv AT alongifilippo 15tmrguidedanddailyadaptedsbrtforprostatecancerfeasibilitypreliminaryclinicaltolerabilityqualityoflifeandpatientreportedoutcomesduringtreatment
AT rigomichele 15tmrguidedanddailyadaptedsbrtforprostatecancerfeasibilitypreliminaryclinicaltolerabilityqualityoflifeandpatientreportedoutcomesduringtreatment
AT figliavanessa 15tmrguidedanddailyadaptedsbrtforprostatecancerfeasibilitypreliminaryclinicaltolerabilityqualityoflifeandpatientreportedoutcomesduringtreatment
AT cucciafrancesco 15tmrguidedanddailyadaptedsbrtforprostatecancerfeasibilitypreliminaryclinicaltolerabilityqualityoflifeandpatientreportedoutcomesduringtreatment
AT giajlevraniccolo 15tmrguidedanddailyadaptedsbrtforprostatecancerfeasibilitypreliminaryclinicaltolerabilityqualityoflifeandpatientreportedoutcomesduringtreatment
AT nicosialuca 15tmrguidedanddailyadaptedsbrtforprostatecancerfeasibilitypreliminaryclinicaltolerabilityqualityoflifeandpatientreportedoutcomesduringtreatment
AT ricchettifrancesco 15tmrguidedanddailyadaptedsbrtforprostatecancerfeasibilitypreliminaryclinicaltolerabilityqualityoflifeandpatientreportedoutcomesduringtreatment
AT sicignanogianluisa 15tmrguidedanddailyadaptedsbrtforprostatecancerfeasibilitypreliminaryclinicaltolerabilityqualityoflifeandpatientreportedoutcomesduringtreatment
AT desimoneantonio 15tmrguidedanddailyadaptedsbrtforprostatecancerfeasibilitypreliminaryclinicaltolerabilityqualityoflifeandpatientreportedoutcomesduringtreatment
AT naccaratostefania 15tmrguidedanddailyadaptedsbrtforprostatecancerfeasibilitypreliminaryclinicaltolerabilityqualityoflifeandpatientreportedoutcomesduringtreatment
AT ruggieriruggero 15tmrguidedanddailyadaptedsbrtforprostatecancerfeasibilitypreliminaryclinicaltolerabilityqualityoflifeandpatientreportedoutcomesduringtreatment
AT mazzolarosario 15tmrguidedanddailyadaptedsbrtforprostatecancerfeasibilitypreliminaryclinicaltolerabilityqualityoflifeandpatientreportedoutcomesduringtreatment