Cargando…

An international, Delphi consensus study to identify priorities for methodological research in behavioral trials in health research

BACKGROUND: Non-communicable chronic diseases are linked to behavioral risk factors (including smoking, poor diet and physical inactivity), so effective behavior change interventions are needed to improve population health. However, uptake and impact of these interventions is limited by methodologic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Byrne, Molly, McSharry, Jenny, Meade, Oonagh, Lavoie, Kim L., Bacon, Simon L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7092577/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32293510
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-020-04235-z
_version_ 1783510129539284992
author Byrne, Molly
McSharry, Jenny
Meade, Oonagh
Lavoie, Kim L.
Bacon, Simon L.
author_facet Byrne, Molly
McSharry, Jenny
Meade, Oonagh
Lavoie, Kim L.
Bacon, Simon L.
author_sort Byrne, Molly
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Non-communicable chronic diseases are linked to behavioral risk factors (including smoking, poor diet and physical inactivity), so effective behavior change interventions are needed to improve population health. However, uptake and impact of these interventions is limited by methodological challenges. We aimed to identify and achieve consensus on priorities for methodological research in behavioral trials in health research among an international behavioral science community. METHODS: An international, Delphi consensus study was conducted. Fifteen core members of the International Behavioral Trials Network (IBTN) were invited to generate methodological items that they consider important. From these, the research team agreed a “long-list” of unique items. Two online surveys were administered to IBTN members (N = 306). Respondents rated the importance of items on a 9-point scale, and ranked their “top-five” priorities. In the second survey, respondents received feedback on others’ responses, before rerating items and re-selecting their top five. RESULTS: Nine experts generated 144 items, which were condensed to a long-list of 33 items. The four most highly endorsed items, in both surveys 1 (n = 77) and 2 (n = 57), came from two thematic categories:“Intervention development” (“Specifying intervention components” and “Tailoring interventions to specific populations and contexts”) and “Implementation” (“How to disseminate behavioral trial research findings to increase implementation” and “Methods for ensuring that behavioral interventions are implementable into practice and policy”). “Development of novel research designs to test behavioral interventions” also emerged as a highly ranked research priority. CONCLUSIONS: From a wide array of identified methodological issues, intervention development, implementation and novel research designs are key themes to drive the future behavioral trials’ research agenda. Funding bodies should prioritize these issues in resource allocation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7092577
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70925772020-03-27 An international, Delphi consensus study to identify priorities for methodological research in behavioral trials in health research Byrne, Molly McSharry, Jenny Meade, Oonagh Lavoie, Kim L. Bacon, Simon L. Trials Research BACKGROUND: Non-communicable chronic diseases are linked to behavioral risk factors (including smoking, poor diet and physical inactivity), so effective behavior change interventions are needed to improve population health. However, uptake and impact of these interventions is limited by methodological challenges. We aimed to identify and achieve consensus on priorities for methodological research in behavioral trials in health research among an international behavioral science community. METHODS: An international, Delphi consensus study was conducted. Fifteen core members of the International Behavioral Trials Network (IBTN) were invited to generate methodological items that they consider important. From these, the research team agreed a “long-list” of unique items. Two online surveys were administered to IBTN members (N = 306). Respondents rated the importance of items on a 9-point scale, and ranked their “top-five” priorities. In the second survey, respondents received feedback on others’ responses, before rerating items and re-selecting their top five. RESULTS: Nine experts generated 144 items, which were condensed to a long-list of 33 items. The four most highly endorsed items, in both surveys 1 (n = 77) and 2 (n = 57), came from two thematic categories:“Intervention development” (“Specifying intervention components” and “Tailoring interventions to specific populations and contexts”) and “Implementation” (“How to disseminate behavioral trial research findings to increase implementation” and “Methods for ensuring that behavioral interventions are implementable into practice and policy”). “Development of novel research designs to test behavioral interventions” also emerged as a highly ranked research priority. CONCLUSIONS: From a wide array of identified methodological issues, intervention development, implementation and novel research designs are key themes to drive the future behavioral trials’ research agenda. Funding bodies should prioritize these issues in resource allocation. BioMed Central 2020-03-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7092577/ /pubmed/32293510 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-020-04235-z Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Byrne, Molly
McSharry, Jenny
Meade, Oonagh
Lavoie, Kim L.
Bacon, Simon L.
An international, Delphi consensus study to identify priorities for methodological research in behavioral trials in health research
title An international, Delphi consensus study to identify priorities for methodological research in behavioral trials in health research
title_full An international, Delphi consensus study to identify priorities for methodological research in behavioral trials in health research
title_fullStr An international, Delphi consensus study to identify priorities for methodological research in behavioral trials in health research
title_full_unstemmed An international, Delphi consensus study to identify priorities for methodological research in behavioral trials in health research
title_short An international, Delphi consensus study to identify priorities for methodological research in behavioral trials in health research
title_sort international, delphi consensus study to identify priorities for methodological research in behavioral trials in health research
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7092577/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32293510
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-020-04235-z
work_keys_str_mv AT byrnemolly aninternationaldelphiconsensusstudytoidentifyprioritiesformethodologicalresearchinbehavioraltrialsinhealthresearch
AT mcsharryjenny aninternationaldelphiconsensusstudytoidentifyprioritiesformethodologicalresearchinbehavioraltrialsinhealthresearch
AT meadeoonagh aninternationaldelphiconsensusstudytoidentifyprioritiesformethodologicalresearchinbehavioraltrialsinhealthresearch
AT lavoiekiml aninternationaldelphiconsensusstudytoidentifyprioritiesformethodologicalresearchinbehavioraltrialsinhealthresearch
AT baconsimonl aninternationaldelphiconsensusstudytoidentifyprioritiesformethodologicalresearchinbehavioraltrialsinhealthresearch
AT byrnemolly internationaldelphiconsensusstudytoidentifyprioritiesformethodologicalresearchinbehavioraltrialsinhealthresearch
AT mcsharryjenny internationaldelphiconsensusstudytoidentifyprioritiesformethodologicalresearchinbehavioraltrialsinhealthresearch
AT meadeoonagh internationaldelphiconsensusstudytoidentifyprioritiesformethodologicalresearchinbehavioraltrialsinhealthresearch
AT lavoiekiml internationaldelphiconsensusstudytoidentifyprioritiesformethodologicalresearchinbehavioraltrialsinhealthresearch
AT baconsimonl internationaldelphiconsensusstudytoidentifyprioritiesformethodologicalresearchinbehavioraltrialsinhealthresearch