Cargando…

Differences in the performance of resuscitation according to the resuscitation guideline terminology during infant cardiopulmonary resuscitation: “Approximately 4 cm” versus “at least one-third the anterior-posterior diameter of the chest”

AIM: This study was conducted to investigate the effect of resuscitation guideline terminology on the performance of infant cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). METHODS: A total of 40 intern or resident physicians conducted 2-min CPR with the two-finger technique (TFT) and two-thumb technique (TT) o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Wongyu, Yang, Dongjun, Oh, Je Hyeok
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7092967/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32208443
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230687
_version_ 1783510206154539008
author Lee, Wongyu
Yang, Dongjun
Oh, Je Hyeok
author_facet Lee, Wongyu
Yang, Dongjun
Oh, Je Hyeok
author_sort Lee, Wongyu
collection PubMed
description AIM: This study was conducted to investigate the effect of resuscitation guideline terminology on the performance of infant cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). METHODS: A total of 40 intern or resident physicians conducted 2-min CPR with the two-finger technique (TFT) and two-thumb technique (TT) on a simulated infant cardiac arrest model with a 1-day interval. They were randomly assigned to Group A or B. The participants of Group A conducted CPR with the chest compression depth (CCD) target of “approximately 4 cm” and those of Group B conducted CPR with the CCD target of “at least one-third the anterior-posterior diameter of the chest”. Single rescuer CPR was performed with a 15:2 compression to ventilation ratio on the floor. RESULTS: In both chest compression techniques, the average CCD of Group B was significantly deeper than that of Group A (TFT: 41.0 [range, 39.3–42.0] mm vs. 36.5 [34.0–37.9] mm, P = 0.002; TT: 42.0 [42.0–43.0] mm vs. 37.0 [35.3–38.0] mm, P < 0.001). Adequacy of CCD also showed similar results (Group B vs. A; TFT: 99% [82–100%] vs. 29% [12–58%], P = 0.001; TT: 100% [100–100%] vs. 28% [8–53%], P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Using the CCD target of “at least one-third the anterior-posterior diameter of the chest” resulted in deep and adequate chest compressions during simulated infant CPR in contrast to the CCD target of “approximately 4 cm”. Therefore, changes in the terminology used in the guidelines should be considered to improve the quality of CPR. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Research Information Service; cris.nih.go.kr/cris/en (Registration number: KCT0003486).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7092967
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70929672020-04-01 Differences in the performance of resuscitation according to the resuscitation guideline terminology during infant cardiopulmonary resuscitation: “Approximately 4 cm” versus “at least one-third the anterior-posterior diameter of the chest” Lee, Wongyu Yang, Dongjun Oh, Je Hyeok PLoS One Research Article AIM: This study was conducted to investigate the effect of resuscitation guideline terminology on the performance of infant cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). METHODS: A total of 40 intern or resident physicians conducted 2-min CPR with the two-finger technique (TFT) and two-thumb technique (TT) on a simulated infant cardiac arrest model with a 1-day interval. They were randomly assigned to Group A or B. The participants of Group A conducted CPR with the chest compression depth (CCD) target of “approximately 4 cm” and those of Group B conducted CPR with the CCD target of “at least one-third the anterior-posterior diameter of the chest”. Single rescuer CPR was performed with a 15:2 compression to ventilation ratio on the floor. RESULTS: In both chest compression techniques, the average CCD of Group B was significantly deeper than that of Group A (TFT: 41.0 [range, 39.3–42.0] mm vs. 36.5 [34.0–37.9] mm, P = 0.002; TT: 42.0 [42.0–43.0] mm vs. 37.0 [35.3–38.0] mm, P < 0.001). Adequacy of CCD also showed similar results (Group B vs. A; TFT: 99% [82–100%] vs. 29% [12–58%], P = 0.001; TT: 100% [100–100%] vs. 28% [8–53%], P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Using the CCD target of “at least one-third the anterior-posterior diameter of the chest” resulted in deep and adequate chest compressions during simulated infant CPR in contrast to the CCD target of “approximately 4 cm”. Therefore, changes in the terminology used in the guidelines should be considered to improve the quality of CPR. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Research Information Service; cris.nih.go.kr/cris/en (Registration number: KCT0003486). Public Library of Science 2020-03-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7092967/ /pubmed/32208443 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230687 Text en © 2020 Lee et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lee, Wongyu
Yang, Dongjun
Oh, Je Hyeok
Differences in the performance of resuscitation according to the resuscitation guideline terminology during infant cardiopulmonary resuscitation: “Approximately 4 cm” versus “at least one-third the anterior-posterior diameter of the chest”
title Differences in the performance of resuscitation according to the resuscitation guideline terminology during infant cardiopulmonary resuscitation: “Approximately 4 cm” versus “at least one-third the anterior-posterior diameter of the chest”
title_full Differences in the performance of resuscitation according to the resuscitation guideline terminology during infant cardiopulmonary resuscitation: “Approximately 4 cm” versus “at least one-third the anterior-posterior diameter of the chest”
title_fullStr Differences in the performance of resuscitation according to the resuscitation guideline terminology during infant cardiopulmonary resuscitation: “Approximately 4 cm” versus “at least one-third the anterior-posterior diameter of the chest”
title_full_unstemmed Differences in the performance of resuscitation according to the resuscitation guideline terminology during infant cardiopulmonary resuscitation: “Approximately 4 cm” versus “at least one-third the anterior-posterior diameter of the chest”
title_short Differences in the performance of resuscitation according to the resuscitation guideline terminology during infant cardiopulmonary resuscitation: “Approximately 4 cm” versus “at least one-third the anterior-posterior diameter of the chest”
title_sort differences in the performance of resuscitation according to the resuscitation guideline terminology during infant cardiopulmonary resuscitation: “approximately 4 cm” versus “at least one-third the anterior-posterior diameter of the chest”
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7092967/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32208443
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230687
work_keys_str_mv AT leewongyu differencesintheperformanceofresuscitationaccordingtotheresuscitationguidelineterminologyduringinfantcardiopulmonaryresuscitationapproximately4cmversusatleastonethirdtheanteriorposteriordiameterofthechest
AT yangdongjun differencesintheperformanceofresuscitationaccordingtotheresuscitationguidelineterminologyduringinfantcardiopulmonaryresuscitationapproximately4cmversusatleastonethirdtheanteriorposteriordiameterofthechest
AT ohjehyeok differencesintheperformanceofresuscitationaccordingtotheresuscitationguidelineterminologyduringinfantcardiopulmonaryresuscitationapproximately4cmversusatleastonethirdtheanteriorposteriordiameterofthechest