Cargando…

Bread Feeding Is a Robust and More Physiological Enteropathogen Administration Method Compared to Oral Gavage

Oral administration is a preferred model for studying infection by bacterial enteropathogens such as Yersinia spp. In the mouse model, the most frequent method for oral infection consists of oral gavage with a feeding needle directly introduced in the animal stomach via the esophagus. In this study,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Derbise, Anne, Echenique-Rivera, Hebert, Garcia-Lopez, Marta, Beau, Rémi, Mattei, Myriam, Varet, Hugo, Dersch, Petra, Pizarro-Cerdá, Javier
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society for Microbiology 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7093149/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32014893
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/IAI.00810-19
_version_ 1783510235776811008
author Derbise, Anne
Echenique-Rivera, Hebert
Garcia-Lopez, Marta
Beau, Rémi
Mattei, Myriam
Varet, Hugo
Dersch, Petra
Pizarro-Cerdá, Javier
author_facet Derbise, Anne
Echenique-Rivera, Hebert
Garcia-Lopez, Marta
Beau, Rémi
Mattei, Myriam
Varet, Hugo
Dersch, Petra
Pizarro-Cerdá, Javier
author_sort Derbise, Anne
collection PubMed
description Oral administration is a preferred model for studying infection by bacterial enteropathogens such as Yersinia spp. In the mouse model, the most frequent method for oral infection consists of oral gavage with a feeding needle directly introduced in the animal stomach via the esophagus. In this study, we compared needle gavage to bread feeding as an alternative mode of bacterial administration. Using bioluminescence-expressing strains of Yersinia pseudotuberculosis and Yersinia enterocolitica, we detected very early upon needle gavage a bioluminescent signal in the neck area together with a signal in the abdominal region, highlighting the presence of two independent sites of bacterial colonization and multiplication. Bacteria were often detected in the esophagus and trachea, as well as in the lymph nodes draining the salivary glands, suggesting that lesions made during needle introduction into the animal oral cavity lead to rapid bacterial draining to proximal lymph nodes. We then tested an alternative mode of bacterial administration using pieces of bread containing bacteria. Upon bread feeding infection, mice exhibited a stronger bioluminescent signal in the abdominal region than with needle gavage, and no signal was detected in the neck area. Moreover, Y. pseudotuberculosis incorporated in the bread is less susceptible to the acidic environment of the stomach and is therefore more efficient in causing intestinal infections. Based on our observations, bread feeding constitutes a natural and more efficient administration method which does not require specialized skills, is less traumatic for the animal, and results in diseases that more closely mimic foodborne intestinal infection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7093149
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher American Society for Microbiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70931492020-04-02 Bread Feeding Is a Robust and More Physiological Enteropathogen Administration Method Compared to Oral Gavage Derbise, Anne Echenique-Rivera, Hebert Garcia-Lopez, Marta Beau, Rémi Mattei, Myriam Varet, Hugo Dersch, Petra Pizarro-Cerdá, Javier Infect Immun Bacterial Infections Oral administration is a preferred model for studying infection by bacterial enteropathogens such as Yersinia spp. In the mouse model, the most frequent method for oral infection consists of oral gavage with a feeding needle directly introduced in the animal stomach via the esophagus. In this study, we compared needle gavage to bread feeding as an alternative mode of bacterial administration. Using bioluminescence-expressing strains of Yersinia pseudotuberculosis and Yersinia enterocolitica, we detected very early upon needle gavage a bioluminescent signal in the neck area together with a signal in the abdominal region, highlighting the presence of two independent sites of bacterial colonization and multiplication. Bacteria were often detected in the esophagus and trachea, as well as in the lymph nodes draining the salivary glands, suggesting that lesions made during needle introduction into the animal oral cavity lead to rapid bacterial draining to proximal lymph nodes. We then tested an alternative mode of bacterial administration using pieces of bread containing bacteria. Upon bread feeding infection, mice exhibited a stronger bioluminescent signal in the abdominal region than with needle gavage, and no signal was detected in the neck area. Moreover, Y. pseudotuberculosis incorporated in the bread is less susceptible to the acidic environment of the stomach and is therefore more efficient in causing intestinal infections. Based on our observations, bread feeding constitutes a natural and more efficient administration method which does not require specialized skills, is less traumatic for the animal, and results in diseases that more closely mimic foodborne intestinal infection. American Society for Microbiology 2020-03-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7093149/ /pubmed/32014893 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/IAI.00810-19 Text en Copyright © 2020 Derbise et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Bacterial Infections
Derbise, Anne
Echenique-Rivera, Hebert
Garcia-Lopez, Marta
Beau, Rémi
Mattei, Myriam
Varet, Hugo
Dersch, Petra
Pizarro-Cerdá, Javier
Bread Feeding Is a Robust and More Physiological Enteropathogen Administration Method Compared to Oral Gavage
title Bread Feeding Is a Robust and More Physiological Enteropathogen Administration Method Compared to Oral Gavage
title_full Bread Feeding Is a Robust and More Physiological Enteropathogen Administration Method Compared to Oral Gavage
title_fullStr Bread Feeding Is a Robust and More Physiological Enteropathogen Administration Method Compared to Oral Gavage
title_full_unstemmed Bread Feeding Is a Robust and More Physiological Enteropathogen Administration Method Compared to Oral Gavage
title_short Bread Feeding Is a Robust and More Physiological Enteropathogen Administration Method Compared to Oral Gavage
title_sort bread feeding is a robust and more physiological enteropathogen administration method compared to oral gavage
topic Bacterial Infections
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7093149/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32014893
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/IAI.00810-19
work_keys_str_mv AT derbiseanne breadfeedingisarobustandmorephysiologicalenteropathogenadministrationmethodcomparedtooralgavage
AT echeniqueriverahebert breadfeedingisarobustandmorephysiologicalenteropathogenadministrationmethodcomparedtooralgavage
AT garcialopezmarta breadfeedingisarobustandmorephysiologicalenteropathogenadministrationmethodcomparedtooralgavage
AT beauremi breadfeedingisarobustandmorephysiologicalenteropathogenadministrationmethodcomparedtooralgavage
AT matteimyriam breadfeedingisarobustandmorephysiologicalenteropathogenadministrationmethodcomparedtooralgavage
AT varethugo breadfeedingisarobustandmorephysiologicalenteropathogenadministrationmethodcomparedtooralgavage
AT derschpetra breadfeedingisarobustandmorephysiologicalenteropathogenadministrationmethodcomparedtooralgavage
AT pizarrocerdajavier breadfeedingisarobustandmorephysiologicalenteropathogenadministrationmethodcomparedtooralgavage