Cargando…
Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration in patients with previous abdominal biliary tract operations
BACKGROUND: A history of abdominal biliary tract surgery has been identified as a relative contraindication for laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE), and there are very few reports about laparoscopic procedures in patients with a history of abdominal biliary tract surgery. METHODS: We r...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7093335/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32072280 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07429-3 |
_version_ | 1783510261313830912 |
---|---|
author | Li, Min Tao, Ying Shen, Sheng Song, Lujun Suo, Tao Liu, Han Wang, Yueqi Zhang, Dexiang Ni, Xiaoling Liu, Houbao |
author_facet | Li, Min Tao, Ying Shen, Sheng Song, Lujun Suo, Tao Liu, Han Wang, Yueqi Zhang, Dexiang Ni, Xiaoling Liu, Houbao |
author_sort | Li, Min |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: A history of abdominal biliary tract surgery has been identified as a relative contraindication for laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE), and there are very few reports about laparoscopic procedures in patients with a history of abdominal biliary tract surgery. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical outcomes of 227 consecutive patients with previous abdominal biliary tract operations at our institution between December 2013 and June 2019. A total of 110 consecutive patients underwent LCBDE, and 117 consecutive patients underwent open common bile duct exploration (OCBDE). Patient demographics and perioperative variables were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The LCBDE group performed significantly better than the OCBDE group with respect to estimated blood loss [30 (5–700) vs. 50 (10–1800) ml; p = 0.041], remnant common bile duct (CBD) stones (17 vs. 28%; p = 0.050), postoperative hospital stay [7 (3–78) vs. 8.5 (4.5–74) days; p = 0.041], and time to oral intake [2.5 (1–7) vs. 3 (2–24) days; p = 0.015]. There were no significant differences in the operation time [170 (60–480) vs. 180 (41–330) minutes; p = 0.067]. A total of 19 patients (17%) in the LCBDE group were converted to open surgery. According to Clavien’s classification of complications, the LCBDE group had significantly fewer postoperative complications than the OCBDE group (40 vs. 57; p = 0.045). There was no mortality in either group. Multiple previous operations (≥ 2 times), a history of open surgery, and previous biliary tract surgery (including bile duct or gallbladder + bile duct other than cholecystectomy alone) were risk factors for postoperative adhesion (p = 0.000, p = 0.000, and p = 0.000, respectively). CONCLUSION: LCBDE is ultimately the least invasive, safest, and the most effective treatment option for patients with previous abdominal biliary tract operations and is especially suitable for those with a history of cholecystectomy, few previous operations (< 2 times), or a history of laparoscopic surgery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7093335 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70933352020-03-26 Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration in patients with previous abdominal biliary tract operations Li, Min Tao, Ying Shen, Sheng Song, Lujun Suo, Tao Liu, Han Wang, Yueqi Zhang, Dexiang Ni, Xiaoling Liu, Houbao Surg Endosc Article BACKGROUND: A history of abdominal biliary tract surgery has been identified as a relative contraindication for laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE), and there are very few reports about laparoscopic procedures in patients with a history of abdominal biliary tract surgery. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical outcomes of 227 consecutive patients with previous abdominal biliary tract operations at our institution between December 2013 and June 2019. A total of 110 consecutive patients underwent LCBDE, and 117 consecutive patients underwent open common bile duct exploration (OCBDE). Patient demographics and perioperative variables were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The LCBDE group performed significantly better than the OCBDE group with respect to estimated blood loss [30 (5–700) vs. 50 (10–1800) ml; p = 0.041], remnant common bile duct (CBD) stones (17 vs. 28%; p = 0.050), postoperative hospital stay [7 (3–78) vs. 8.5 (4.5–74) days; p = 0.041], and time to oral intake [2.5 (1–7) vs. 3 (2–24) days; p = 0.015]. There were no significant differences in the operation time [170 (60–480) vs. 180 (41–330) minutes; p = 0.067]. A total of 19 patients (17%) in the LCBDE group were converted to open surgery. According to Clavien’s classification of complications, the LCBDE group had significantly fewer postoperative complications than the OCBDE group (40 vs. 57; p = 0.045). There was no mortality in either group. Multiple previous operations (≥ 2 times), a history of open surgery, and previous biliary tract surgery (including bile duct or gallbladder + bile duct other than cholecystectomy alone) were risk factors for postoperative adhesion (p = 0.000, p = 0.000, and p = 0.000, respectively). CONCLUSION: LCBDE is ultimately the least invasive, safest, and the most effective treatment option for patients with previous abdominal biliary tract operations and is especially suitable for those with a history of cholecystectomy, few previous operations (< 2 times), or a history of laparoscopic surgery. Springer US 2020-02-18 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7093335/ /pubmed/32072280 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07429-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Li, Min Tao, Ying Shen, Sheng Song, Lujun Suo, Tao Liu, Han Wang, Yueqi Zhang, Dexiang Ni, Xiaoling Liu, Houbao Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration in patients with previous abdominal biliary tract operations |
title | Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration in patients with previous abdominal biliary tract operations |
title_full | Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration in patients with previous abdominal biliary tract operations |
title_fullStr | Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration in patients with previous abdominal biliary tract operations |
title_full_unstemmed | Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration in patients with previous abdominal biliary tract operations |
title_short | Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration in patients with previous abdominal biliary tract operations |
title_sort | laparoscopic common bile duct exploration in patients with previous abdominal biliary tract operations |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7093335/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32072280 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07429-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT limin laparoscopiccommonbileductexplorationinpatientswithpreviousabdominalbiliarytractoperations AT taoying laparoscopiccommonbileductexplorationinpatientswithpreviousabdominalbiliarytractoperations AT shensheng laparoscopiccommonbileductexplorationinpatientswithpreviousabdominalbiliarytractoperations AT songlujun laparoscopiccommonbileductexplorationinpatientswithpreviousabdominalbiliarytractoperations AT suotao laparoscopiccommonbileductexplorationinpatientswithpreviousabdominalbiliarytractoperations AT liuhan laparoscopiccommonbileductexplorationinpatientswithpreviousabdominalbiliarytractoperations AT wangyueqi laparoscopiccommonbileductexplorationinpatientswithpreviousabdominalbiliarytractoperations AT zhangdexiang laparoscopiccommonbileductexplorationinpatientswithpreviousabdominalbiliarytractoperations AT nixiaoling laparoscopiccommonbileductexplorationinpatientswithpreviousabdominalbiliarytractoperations AT liuhoubao laparoscopiccommonbileductexplorationinpatientswithpreviousabdominalbiliarytractoperations |