Cargando…
Tracking two pleasures
Can people track several pleasures? In everyday life, pleasing stimuli rarely appear in isolation. Yet, experiments on aesthetic pleasure usually present only one image at a time. Here, we ask whether people can reliably report the pleasure of either of two images seen in a single glimpse. Participa...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7093342/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31898260 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-019-01695-6 |
_version_ | 1783510262941220864 |
---|---|
author | Brielmann, Aenne A. Pelli, Denis G. |
author_facet | Brielmann, Aenne A. Pelli, Denis G. |
author_sort | Brielmann, Aenne A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Can people track several pleasures? In everyday life, pleasing stimuli rarely appear in isolation. Yet, experiments on aesthetic pleasure usually present only one image at a time. Here, we ask whether people can reliably report the pleasure of either of two images seen in a single glimpse. Participants (N = 13 in the original; +25 in the preregistered replication) viewed 36 Open Affective Standardized Image Set (OASIS) images that span the entire range of pleasure and beauty. On each trial, the observer saw two images, side by side, for 200 ms. An arrow cue pointed, randomly, left, right, or bidirectionally. Left or right indicated which image (the target) to rate while ignoring the other (the distractor); bidirectional requested rating the combined pleasure of both images. In half the blocks, the cue came before the images (precuing). Otherwise, it came after (postcuing). Precuing allowed the observer to ignore the distractor, while postcuing demanded tracking both images. Finally, we obtained single-pleasure ratings for each image shown alone. Our replication confirms the original study. People have unbiased access to their felt pleasure from each image and the average of both. Furthermore, the variance of the observer’s report is similar whether reporting the pleasure of one image or the average pleasure of two. The undiminished variance for reports of the average pleasure of two images indicates either that the underlying pleasure variances are highly correlated, or, more likely, that the variance arises in the common reporting process. In brief, observers can faithfully track at least two visual pleasures. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.3758/s13423-019-01695-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7093342 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70933422020-03-26 Tracking two pleasures Brielmann, Aenne A. Pelli, Denis G. Psychon Bull Rev Brief Report Can people track several pleasures? In everyday life, pleasing stimuli rarely appear in isolation. Yet, experiments on aesthetic pleasure usually present only one image at a time. Here, we ask whether people can reliably report the pleasure of either of two images seen in a single glimpse. Participants (N = 13 in the original; +25 in the preregistered replication) viewed 36 Open Affective Standardized Image Set (OASIS) images that span the entire range of pleasure and beauty. On each trial, the observer saw two images, side by side, for 200 ms. An arrow cue pointed, randomly, left, right, or bidirectionally. Left or right indicated which image (the target) to rate while ignoring the other (the distractor); bidirectional requested rating the combined pleasure of both images. In half the blocks, the cue came before the images (precuing). Otherwise, it came after (postcuing). Precuing allowed the observer to ignore the distractor, while postcuing demanded tracking both images. Finally, we obtained single-pleasure ratings for each image shown alone. Our replication confirms the original study. People have unbiased access to their felt pleasure from each image and the average of both. Furthermore, the variance of the observer’s report is similar whether reporting the pleasure of one image or the average pleasure of two. The undiminished variance for reports of the average pleasure of two images indicates either that the underlying pleasure variances are highly correlated, or, more likely, that the variance arises in the common reporting process. In brief, observers can faithfully track at least two visual pleasures. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.3758/s13423-019-01695-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2020-01-02 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7093342/ /pubmed/31898260 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-019-01695-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Brief Report Brielmann, Aenne A. Pelli, Denis G. Tracking two pleasures |
title | Tracking two pleasures |
title_full | Tracking two pleasures |
title_fullStr | Tracking two pleasures |
title_full_unstemmed | Tracking two pleasures |
title_short | Tracking two pleasures |
title_sort | tracking two pleasures |
topic | Brief Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7093342/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31898260 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-019-01695-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brielmannaennea trackingtwopleasures AT pellidenisg trackingtwopleasures |