Cargando…

Distributed source analysis of magnetoencephalography using a volume head model combined with statistical methods improves focus diagnosis in epilepsy surgery

Deep-seated epileptic focus estimation using magnetoencephalography is challenging because of its low signal-to-noise ratio and the ambiguity of current sources estimated by interictal epileptiform discharge (IED). We developed a distributed source (DS) analysis method using a volume head model as t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ishizaki, Tomotaka, Maesawa, Satoshi, Nakatsubo, Daisuke, Yamamoto, Hiroyuki, Takai, Sou, Shibata, Masashi, Kato, Sachiko, Natsume, Jun, Hoshiyama, Minoru, Wakabayashi, Toshihiko
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7093400/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32210314
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-62098-5
_version_ 1783510275940417536
author Ishizaki, Tomotaka
Maesawa, Satoshi
Nakatsubo, Daisuke
Yamamoto, Hiroyuki
Takai, Sou
Shibata, Masashi
Kato, Sachiko
Natsume, Jun
Hoshiyama, Minoru
Wakabayashi, Toshihiko
author_facet Ishizaki, Tomotaka
Maesawa, Satoshi
Nakatsubo, Daisuke
Yamamoto, Hiroyuki
Takai, Sou
Shibata, Masashi
Kato, Sachiko
Natsume, Jun
Hoshiyama, Minoru
Wakabayashi, Toshihiko
author_sort Ishizaki, Tomotaka
collection PubMed
description Deep-seated epileptic focus estimation using magnetoencephalography is challenging because of its low signal-to-noise ratio and the ambiguity of current sources estimated by interictal epileptiform discharge (IED). We developed a distributed source (DS) analysis method using a volume head model as the source space of the forward model and standardized low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography combined with statistical methods (permutation tests between IEDs and baselines and false discovery rate between voxels to reduce variation). We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the combined DS (cDS) analysis in surgical cases. In total, 19 surgical cases with adult and pediatric focal epilepsy were evaluated. Both cDS and equivalent current dipole (ECD) analyses were performed in all cases. The concordance rates of the two methods with surgically identified epileptic foci were calculated and compared with surgical outcomes. Concordance rates from the cDS analysis were significantly higher than those from the ECD analysis (68.4% vs. 26.3%), especially in cases with deep-seated lesions, such as in the interhemispheric, fronto-temporal base, and mesial temporal structures (81.8% vs. 9.1%). Furthermore, the concordance rate correlated well with surgical outcomes. In conclusion, cDS analysis has better diagnostic performance in focal epilepsy, especially with deep-seated epileptic focus, and potentially leads to good surgical outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7093400
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70934002020-03-27 Distributed source analysis of magnetoencephalography using a volume head model combined with statistical methods improves focus diagnosis in epilepsy surgery Ishizaki, Tomotaka Maesawa, Satoshi Nakatsubo, Daisuke Yamamoto, Hiroyuki Takai, Sou Shibata, Masashi Kato, Sachiko Natsume, Jun Hoshiyama, Minoru Wakabayashi, Toshihiko Sci Rep Article Deep-seated epileptic focus estimation using magnetoencephalography is challenging because of its low signal-to-noise ratio and the ambiguity of current sources estimated by interictal epileptiform discharge (IED). We developed a distributed source (DS) analysis method using a volume head model as the source space of the forward model and standardized low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography combined with statistical methods (permutation tests between IEDs and baselines and false discovery rate between voxels to reduce variation). We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the combined DS (cDS) analysis in surgical cases. In total, 19 surgical cases with adult and pediatric focal epilepsy were evaluated. Both cDS and equivalent current dipole (ECD) analyses were performed in all cases. The concordance rates of the two methods with surgically identified epileptic foci were calculated and compared with surgical outcomes. Concordance rates from the cDS analysis were significantly higher than those from the ECD analysis (68.4% vs. 26.3%), especially in cases with deep-seated lesions, such as in the interhemispheric, fronto-temporal base, and mesial temporal structures (81.8% vs. 9.1%). Furthermore, the concordance rate correlated well with surgical outcomes. In conclusion, cDS analysis has better diagnostic performance in focal epilepsy, especially with deep-seated epileptic focus, and potentially leads to good surgical outcomes. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-03-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7093400/ /pubmed/32210314 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-62098-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Ishizaki, Tomotaka
Maesawa, Satoshi
Nakatsubo, Daisuke
Yamamoto, Hiroyuki
Takai, Sou
Shibata, Masashi
Kato, Sachiko
Natsume, Jun
Hoshiyama, Minoru
Wakabayashi, Toshihiko
Distributed source analysis of magnetoencephalography using a volume head model combined with statistical methods improves focus diagnosis in epilepsy surgery
title Distributed source analysis of magnetoencephalography using a volume head model combined with statistical methods improves focus diagnosis in epilepsy surgery
title_full Distributed source analysis of magnetoencephalography using a volume head model combined with statistical methods improves focus diagnosis in epilepsy surgery
title_fullStr Distributed source analysis of magnetoencephalography using a volume head model combined with statistical methods improves focus diagnosis in epilepsy surgery
title_full_unstemmed Distributed source analysis of magnetoencephalography using a volume head model combined with statistical methods improves focus diagnosis in epilepsy surgery
title_short Distributed source analysis of magnetoencephalography using a volume head model combined with statistical methods improves focus diagnosis in epilepsy surgery
title_sort distributed source analysis of magnetoencephalography using a volume head model combined with statistical methods improves focus diagnosis in epilepsy surgery
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7093400/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32210314
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-62098-5
work_keys_str_mv AT ishizakitomotaka distributedsourceanalysisofmagnetoencephalographyusingavolumeheadmodelcombinedwithstatisticalmethodsimprovesfocusdiagnosisinepilepsysurgery
AT maesawasatoshi distributedsourceanalysisofmagnetoencephalographyusingavolumeheadmodelcombinedwithstatisticalmethodsimprovesfocusdiagnosisinepilepsysurgery
AT nakatsubodaisuke distributedsourceanalysisofmagnetoencephalographyusingavolumeheadmodelcombinedwithstatisticalmethodsimprovesfocusdiagnosisinepilepsysurgery
AT yamamotohiroyuki distributedsourceanalysisofmagnetoencephalographyusingavolumeheadmodelcombinedwithstatisticalmethodsimprovesfocusdiagnosisinepilepsysurgery
AT takaisou distributedsourceanalysisofmagnetoencephalographyusingavolumeheadmodelcombinedwithstatisticalmethodsimprovesfocusdiagnosisinepilepsysurgery
AT shibatamasashi distributedsourceanalysisofmagnetoencephalographyusingavolumeheadmodelcombinedwithstatisticalmethodsimprovesfocusdiagnosisinepilepsysurgery
AT katosachiko distributedsourceanalysisofmagnetoencephalographyusingavolumeheadmodelcombinedwithstatisticalmethodsimprovesfocusdiagnosisinepilepsysurgery
AT natsumejun distributedsourceanalysisofmagnetoencephalographyusingavolumeheadmodelcombinedwithstatisticalmethodsimprovesfocusdiagnosisinepilepsysurgery
AT hoshiyamaminoru distributedsourceanalysisofmagnetoencephalographyusingavolumeheadmodelcombinedwithstatisticalmethodsimprovesfocusdiagnosisinepilepsysurgery
AT wakabayashitoshihiko distributedsourceanalysisofmagnetoencephalographyusingavolumeheadmodelcombinedwithstatisticalmethodsimprovesfocusdiagnosisinepilepsysurgery